ShootingArts said:

I can vouch for Lil Joe Villalpando's DVD's if you can get them. Gonna look around one day and not be able to get them.

Click to expand...

ShootingArts said:

On the other hand, you have been around long enough to be world class and shitting all of us!

Hu

Click to expand...

fastone371 said:

Now show me moving views from a mile before in each direction. Your little handycam photo isn't a very good representation. I have to say, judging from your other posts I expected a little more from you. Why are you so triggered over this in the first place, did you call Cabrini Green home??

Click to expand...

dquarasr said:

So the ball is pocketed then comes out? And you’re asking because someone might claim a foul because nothing hit a rail, right?

Christ on a Bike!

Click to expand...

SSP said:

I've been using the green version of this chalk for years, have no reason to change, I've read quite a few reviews of people who have used the blue version and say it's different, the most common comment I've seen is that it feels creamier than the green and leaves marks on the cueball, TAOM says it's the same formula, my first thought was why would a reputable company like TAOM lie about it being the same formula if it wasn't? What would they have to gain by lying, didn't make any sense, my second thought was why would some guys on a pool forum lie about how it felt to them? That didn't make sense either, so I bought a round of the blue V10 and have been using it for the last 11 days for at least an hour a day, did it feel creamier? Yes, did it leave more marks on the cueball, Yes, but most of the marks would go away on their own, I can attribute some of that to the blue version being a darker blue and the green being a lighter green, so I've been pondering why did TAOM lie about not changing the formula, then it hit me, what if the formula of the dyes used to color the chalk was causing the change, it took me back to science class, oxygen is 2 atoms of oxygen or O2, ozone is 3 atoms of oxygen and if you breathe it will kill you, if one atom in a pure element can make that big of a difference what happens when you you mix a lot of different elements, logically it would have to cause more change, so what I've come to believe is both are true, TAOM didn't change the formula, but the dyes reacted differently with the untreated chalk, I can't prove it but it does make sense

Click to expand...

JohnnyOzone said:

If the Ref sees the CB going off the tangent line of the 8 ball last, then they ARE calling what they see. Referees should have the highest level of knowledge of anyone when it comes to knowing how to tell a good hit from a bad one. In your theory, all Yapp had to do was hit the balls 100 miles an hour, then nobody could "see" which ball was hit first (or last)

Click to expand...

GideonF said:

I have neither met nor played with Aloysius. I accept that he’s an honourable players and was waiting for the ref’s call.

However, I find it hard to believe he didn’t know he fouled. If most informed amateurs believed he fouled, I think he knows as much as they do and also believed he hit the 4 first.

That said, I do believe he felt that it was up to the referee and the referee called it good so he accepted the referee’s decision.

Click to expand...