Yapp’s Controversial Tournament-Winning Shot in the 8-Ball World Championship … Was it a Foul?
- By GideonF
- Main Forum
- 149 Replies
Coming from a British cue sports background I think you should call fouls on yourself even when there is a referee. We always do on league nights if we think we've fouled even when the referee doesn't call it and pro snooker players have often called fouls on themselves when the ref has missed it or alerted the referee if they feel the balls haven't been replaced properly and they've gained an advantage. Appreciate every culture is different, but I wouldn't want to win that way.
I agree on the snooker culture point and I have advocated on here that pool needs a culture shift in this regard. Regularly calling touches of the ball, or double hits etc. But those are things the player can feel.
I’m not sure what a snooker player would do in this situation. I mentioned in the other thread someone (Murphy I think) asking the referee to watch a replay of the shot to ensure he had hit the correct ball first (no foul was called initially). The ref watched it and it was a good hit. But I don’t know what he does (or should do) if the referee watches it back and says it was good and Murphy thinks the video shows he hit the wrong ball first. He might tell the ref “I think I hit the wrong ball first and fouled” but if the ref says no what do you do? At some point isn’t it the ref’s call on such an issue?