With that, wasn't it Jeanette Lee who told the guy that bought 100% of her that she would dump if they didnt let her buy half(and this isnt before the draw, it's when she was gonna cash) .
What a POS move that is, and yet all the drooling idiots on here worship her
I think I remember this thread.
If I'm not mistaken, that's where I first went on my rant about the calcutta 10%.
Didn't she leave or something cause she forgot her cue or whatever? Or some other circumstances around her doing whatever controversial thing? Or am I mixing 2 threads up?
I mean why didn't she take half of herself in the first place would be my question.
And at the same time, I don't feel players have ANY obligation to appease someone who bought them.
That's a YOU problem.
One would think that they would respectfully toss her some jelly if she won, but they aren't obligated to if she didn't take half herself in the first place.
But that goes to my point.
Calcuttas introduce complications into a tournament where they didn't exist, before the calcutta entered the picture.
