Was pool better 50 years ago?

Adding to Jazznpool's excellent reply to your post, this type of thinking just doesn't work. Yes, give a Filler or a Shane bucket pockets, Simonis cloth, rails and balls with today's quality, jump cues, screw-on extensions, and the better pool tables in use today and they would run a whole lot of racks, but that's not a meaningful comparison across generations.

Today's players play with better tables that have better rails and better ball sets. They all have jump cues. They have screw-on cue extensions that ensure that the bridge need nearly ever be used. Fifty years ago, most players did not even have break cues, never mind jump cues. They played on slow, nappy cloth and some of the positional shots that look routine today were almost impossible back in the day. If you had to play a power-stun shot off a five-degree angle, you had to have huge power to make it happen. Need a long draw off a long shot? Only the best could do it back in the pre-Simonis days. One reason that Strickland and Sigel were the two best 9ball players forty-five years ago, shortly before the switch to Simonis, was that both had an extremely powerful stroke. It's so easily forgotten.

There is little doubt in my mind that, even on the equipment and conditions of yesteryear, a Filler of a Shane would have played at a higher level than their counterparts of fifty years ago, but by less than one might guess.
You had to be careful drawing the big rock, that would kill your action immediately

FREE Action Stream.......starts tonite

10 has to be around 700 iirc
Id say at least 670 but 700 could be correct. That boy was pissed about his $$$ 🤣

The other guy had a bunch of rich people for me to play, I only got to play 1 of them once then left town. That guy barely knew which end of the cue to hold, but his biz was "slightly" illegal so i didn't feel bad, and he did it all to himself, suggested gambling, and kept raising the bet. Lol

Pallet of new cues for sale at 20 cues per box for $100 ($5/cue) --- Comments?

It's mind boggling how cheap you can buy Chinese items. Look at this scale for $7. Shipped from China, packaged, marketed, and then sold for a profit...for less than $7.
I think some of it is that there isn't a profit, it is subsidized, or its a liquidation. The pallet of cues I posted is likely a liquidation item. Something happened to that pallet that caused the cues to be sold to a liquidator. Maybe they got soaked in seawater or a check of a few boxes found warped cues making the whole pallet non-deliverable.

Still, Poolhall60561's post appears to have vendor selling new cues for $1 to $2 a cue --- not a liquidation item. How can that be? I think its impossible to get the parts of a cue for $1 or $2. Maybe its special conditions of getting rid of spare parts or a marketing ploy that sells cues at a loss to get market share or to bury a competitor. In any event, I don't think parts to a cue, even in China, can cost less than $2.

FREE Action Stream.......starts tonite

I'll say this, when I lived in AZ for a year I drilled a 10 and a 10+1 nuts in playing even 9 ball. The 10+1 was so mad he tried getting me kicked out of playing basically anywhere lol. He though he smelled something sweet, instead he got a dose that left him sore for a week 🤣.

Im sure somebody on here can equate 10 and 10+1 speed to Fargo, I think the highest rating out there was 10+2 and im thinking only Scott Frost and Roger Griffis(RIP) were that rating.

All the $$$ out there was in the 7 and under and 8 and under tournaments. Sadly got sent out of town for work before I could rob those and everybody in them who gambled. I almost blew my cover completely with that 10+1. 🤣 it was like an hr from where I lived, unfortunately, that wasn't far enough

Those days are long behind me, I don't have the ambition and I really don't like taking peoples money except in poker.
10 has to be around 700 iirc

Filter

Back
Top