SA96 said:

AJ Manas will learn a valuable lesson here.

Treat every rack with respect.

Click to expand...

SA96 said:

I went to all 4 days at the last Mosconi Cup, and SVB was the only one who turned up.

Fedor, Sky, Billy and Tyler were an embarrassment.

Shane has a bad Mosconi Cup record because he keeps getting matched up against the best Euro players.

If Shane isn't on the team, then Johan has lost the plot.

Click to expand...

GideonF said:

Petri is going to be sick. He missed the 8b to win 10-8, then lost the safety battle hill hill.

The miss by Petri is interesting to me. He tried to shoot the 8 along the short rail with inside English at slow speed to hold for the 9b. Probably should have hit it hard and gone up and down the table. I think even for top pros that slow inside spin is tough under pressure!

Click to expand...

VarmintKong said:

You quote self to make seem smart?

Me try read but no brain little.

You smart talk to self more now often.

I try listen. But my head hurt.

Party… On?

Click to expand...

Bob Jewett said:

The matches are listed in draw order so you can tell who is in each bracket. (Unimportant for the semis) The streaming order is according to the best viewing for the audience, maybe.

Click to expand...

GideonF said:

... Who is the genius who put the second match first on the list?

“Oh, Shane is up first. At 3 pm?”

No, the next match is up first at 1.

Click to expand...

Bob Jewett said:

Here's the lineup for Sunday. Florida times.

View attachment 922582

Click to expand...

Lowell said:

Petri Makkonen kinda choked, he should have had that one in the bag

Click to expand...

straightline said:

Talent? No metrics. For jocks, it's a function of review. Aptitude can be gauged somewhat but here's where it fogs out. The wannabes in question are incorporated into this random trainee educational system, first come first served.
This matters (if only for this paragraph) because all things being equal, the situations will always be unequal. The resistances will always be asequential as will the progress and most prominently the progress as compared to the individual progresses of the rest of the group.
IOW who is best prepared at the time of intersection will be the dominant subject. This will change and continue to change; much like car racing.

If the finish line is the node of reference, then the first finishers can be analyzed for "talent" as an aesthetic to marvel or argue about.
If that's too clinical, add random money; randomly distributed and asequentially of course.

lol...

Lol. Talent is a manifestation of the whole. Mozart, Picasso, Fangio and then you're already into aptitude and successful application. Now aptidude (calling that correct ), need not be confined to gym skills but mental attributes seem to be taboo.

Click to expand...

j2pac said:

Try the Ghost CF shaft coating. I use it on mine, and I do not use a glove.
[emoji106]

Click to expand...

VarmintKong said:

Boo this man. Boo him!

Click to expand...

straightline said:

Talent? No metrics. For jocks, it's a function of review. Aptitude can be gauged somewhat but here's where it fogs out. The wannabes in question are incorporated into this random trainee educational system, first come first served.
This matters (if only for this paragraph) because all things being equal, the situations will always be unequal. The resistances will always be asequential as will the progress and most prominently the progress as compared to the individual progresses of the rest of the group.
IOW who is best prepared at the time of intersection will be the dominant subject. This will change and continue to change; much like car racing.

If the finish line is the node of reference, then the first finishers can be analyzed for "talent" as an aesthetic to marvel or argue about.
If that's too clinical, add random money; randomly distributed and asequentially of course.

lol...

Click to expand...