hmm...
that is interesting. i never really gave it much thought. so there are more lefty's out there than one might think.
i would have lost that bet for sure!
there is no way that i would have ever thought that there would be upwards of 30% lefty's in a tourney.
i would have thought 20% or less for sure!
that is what piques my interest. i'd like to see the diff between patterns that lefty's play versus right handed players. is the shot selection the same? or slightly different?
If the probability of a person being left handed is .11, then in a room with 100 poolplayers, there should be 11 left- handed people, right? My friend got me on no less than 2 signed dollars at 2 different big tournaments on this bet. First she said that there would be more than 15% lefty's, and I bet there would be less (thinking that .11 plus another .4 would cover me easily.) Yes, we watched and counted- the tourney was out of our league. On the second signed dollar bet, different tourney, she even upped the %age to be more in my favor- something ridiculous, like 30%, but I forget exactly what. And yes, I lost again.
There are way more left handed poolplayers in any random sample than there ought to be- I don't know why. Maybe it's the creative thinking, I really really don't know. Maybe my best friend just cheats (a huge possibility). But I'm not betting her any more on this one- she can just kick rocks.
that is interesting. i never really gave it much thought. so there are more lefty's out there than one might think.
i would have lost that bet for sure!
there is no way that i would have ever thought that there would be upwards of 30% lefty's in a tourney.
i would have thought 20% or less for sure!
that is what piques my interest. i'd like to see the diff between patterns that lefty's play versus right handed players. is the shot selection the same? or slightly different?