CTE testimonial

DO YOU still need perception with CTE?
Yes, based on everything I have heard, read, and tried. The effective length of the "pivot" must be varied based on the perception of the shot distance. The initial alignment choice also depends on one's perception of the shot angle.

Regards,
Dave
 
Yes, based on everything I have heard, read, and tried. The effective length of the "pivot" must be varied based on the perception of the shot distance. The initial alignment choice also depends on one's perception of the shot angle.

Regards,
Dave

There is no perception of the shot angle, ever. I never care what the angle is, outside of seeing if it's thick or thin to determine which side of the ctel i'm setting up on.

The shot angle is nearly meaningless.

If you think you have to perceive the shot angle, whatever it is you're trying isn't CTE.
 
I never care what the angle is, outside of seeing if it's thick or thin to determine which side of the ctel i'm setting up on.

I believe "thick" and "thin" are the kinds of "perception of the shot angle" Dave's talking about. That's why he called it the "initial alignment choice".

If you think you have to perceive the shot angle, whatever it is you're trying isn't CTE.

This kind of simple miscommunication is why it's almost impossible to discuss this stuff here (and why I often resort to pictures).

pj
chgo
 
There is no perception of the shot angle, ever. I never care what the angle is, outside of seeing if it's thick or thin to determine which side of the ctel i'm setting up on.

The shot angle is nearly meaningless.

If you think you have to perceive the shot angle, whatever it is you're trying isn't CTE.
So you align and pivot the same way for a thin cut vs. a thick hit? If you do change how you align for shots of different cut angles, then you are perceiving differences in cut angle. I'm not implying you need to identify the angle in degrees (with a number), but you do need to do something different for a shot close to a 1/4-ball hit as compared to a shot close to a 3/4-ball hit, so you must perceive difference in cut angle. Right?

Sorry for the confusion,
Dave
 
So you align and pivot the same way for a thin cut vs. a thick hit? If you do change how you align for shots of different cut angles, then you are perceiving differences in cut angle. I'm not implying you need to identify the angle in degrees (with a number), but you do need to do something different for a shot close to a 1/4-ball hit as compared to a shot close to a 3/4-ball hit, so you must perceive difference in cut angle. Right?

Sorry for the confusion,
Dave

Call Stan and get a lesson - i'm wore out being AZB's CTE guy. I could care less if no one one earth knows this stuff. No one appointed me the azb CTE authority.

I made a comment based on your comment and I'd prefer to leave it at that. I'm not looking to get into an instructional back-and-forth.
 
Call Stan and get a lesson - i'm wore out being AZB's CTE guy. I could care less if no one one earth knows this stuff. No one appointed me the azb CTE authority.

I made a comment based on your comment and I'd prefer to leave it at that. I'm not looking to get into an instructional back-and-forth.
The "magic" is in the "pivot."

Thanks,
Dave
 
The "magic" is in the "pivot."

Thanks,
Dave

The only reason you're saying that is because I told you the pivot is dynamic... otherwise, you wouldn't have had this "epiphany." So, if magic is what you wanna call it - yes, you're correct.
 
The only reason you're saying that is because I told you the pivot is dynamic... otherwise, you wouldn't have had this "epiphany." So, if magic is what you wanna call it - yes, you're correct.
If you would have agreed to this months ago, before the hundreds of posts in numerous threads, all of the CTE discussion (and confusion) could have been avoided.

The "magic" is in the variable/dynamic "pivot," which requires lots of practice and "judgment/feel" to master.

Judging from some of the videos you have posted in the past, you have excellent judgment and feel for aiming, and your stroke is very consistent. I certainly wish my skills in these areas were as good as yours.

Regards,
Dave
 
If you would have agreed to this months ago, before the hundreds of posts in numerous threads, all of the CTE discussion (and confusion) could have been avoided.

The "magic" is in the variable/dynamic "pivot," which requires lots of practice and "judgment/feel" to master.

Judging from some of the videos you have posted in the past, you have excellent judgment and feel for aiming, and your stroke is very consistent. I certainly wish my skills in these areas were as good as yours.

Regards,
Dave

Funny, I learned the pivot in 5 minutes.
 
Sounds familiar...



Just not interested, huh? Yeah, that must be it.

pj
chgo

That IS it. I think someone around here said something to the effect of, "Don't underestimate me when i tell you I honestly don't give a shit."

I guess you can bet me if I really know more than I post-- missing pieces if you would, but the last time you stepped into me (about the bridge is always the pivot point).... it didn't end well for ya. Now it's common knowledge that doesn't have to be the case...good thing we didn't bet because I really like your posts and having you around.

You're like Bizarro Superman and I'm Superman... the only difference is I can really fly. It'd be boring w/out you here. :grin:

I know you jab me a lot and have condescending tones in every post towards me (and most others), but I still love ya. It's cute ;)
 
Last edited:
Learning how to pivot ... 5 minutes.

Learning how to make every shot on the table with CTE or any method ... a lifetime.

The "magic" is in the "pivot."

Regards,
Dave

How would you know? You never played with CTE. Since you're a PH.D... can we call that your "hypothesis?"

You should post a video of your understanding of CTE and run some balls with it. Stop hiding behind the keyboard and
disguise.jpg

and show us something.
 
It should be obvious that no aiming system includes compensation for squirt/swerve, and (as Dr. Dave says just three posts above yours) any common squirt/swerve adjustment, including "intuitive" adjustment, should work with any aiming system. You already do it with whatever aiming method you use.

pj
chgo

Aiming with english is the only reason imo you need any sort of aiming system besides ghost ball. My system takes english into account while lining up for a shot in the placement of the bridge hand and the location of the aim point. Ideally, the aim point will be very consistent for different cloth conditions while any necessary adjustments for different cloth conditions are made in the bridge position and stroke speed/shot selection.
 
Learning how to pivot ... 5 minutes.

Learning how to make every shot on the table with CTE or any method ... a lifetime.

The "magic" is in the "pivot."

Regards,
Dave

Doesn't make sense. If magic is in the pivot, and the pivot takes 5 minutes to learn, than most shots on the table are learned in 5 minutes. Wait, that maaaakes sense. Good luck with your lifetime of learning how to feeeeel your shot. Feeeel your adjustment. Good luck.
 
I'll tell ya what's "magic" --- how you make "ANYTHING" shooting like this...
http://billiards.colostate.edu/normal_videos/NV2-2.htm
Agreed ... that video is not very good. Although, it does make the point it was intended to make ... to keep the grip hand relaxed during the stroke. That video is at the top of my list of videos to redo (if I can ever find the time). Not that it should matter to anybody, but a better representation of my current stroke can be found here:

This clip was filmed in 2009. I am certainly a much better pool player now than I was in 2003. And I certainly still have a lot more room for improvement (i.e., I still have a lot of "potential").

Regards,
Dave
 
Back
Top