I understand what Glen is doing just didn't realize that there were so many tables modified in that fashion. Why would a table be modified like that? to save money on cheap rubber?
Just take a look at how clean it's turning out already...and I'm not even done yet![]()
I understand what Glen is doing just didn't realize that there were so many tables modified in that fashion. Why would a table be modified like that? to save money on cheap rubber?
I think it's a left coast thing.![]()
Ernesto thing.
One of them I think.Because the mechanic that did this didn't like the Super speed cushions or the reliability of them, so he did what he thought would work. By simply installing K66 profile cushions to replace cushions on rails designed for K55 cushions the nose of the K66 cushions would be at 1 9/16th's high causing the rails to play dead by pinching the balls. So by mounting the cushions a little lower than the K55 cushions were mounted, the nose height was at 1 7/16"ths where it needed to be, but that left a step on the top of the cushions where they were bonded to the sub-rail liner, thus the belt sanding to remove that step in a down-ward angle to blend it into the top of the cushions, problem is because of the mounted profile of the K66 cushions on the wrong sub-rail bevel, the cushions still pinch the balls causing the balls to bank short and table to play slower than normal, but still playable.
Trying to restore the sub-rail to factory settings is not an easy job, so all these tables have been passed over from restoration by everyone that has worked on them since then, so none of these tables still play right today.
Now, with my special tooling, repairing all these GC's is just basic, so my tooling in the hands of the right mechanics, these tables today can be corrected. If the Artemis K66 pool cushions were the cushions installed before, then the sub-rails can be corrected to use that profile of cushion correctly on the GC's, thus problem fixed
Glen
One of them I think.
Yep, that has K66 cushions on it. If you look at the center of the cloth on the top of the cushion you can see how it dips in the center, that's because the top of the sub-rail instead of being flat, is at a down-ward angle, then the cushion instead of coming straight out from the rail, humps up the nose of the cushion, so you kind of like have a valley in the top of the rail between the Formica and the nose of the cushion
Glen
Yup.
And it rebounds short. Specially when the ball is frozen on the rail. Lots of double-kisses.
Am really disappointed. I paid good amount to have the original Monarch cushions taken out and replaced with Artemis.
The old Monarch played better than this.
Ernesto thing.
Glen - are you re-cutting the angles on the subrails to accept the K55 cushions again? Unless I missed it, I didn't see in your posts which profile they are cut for. If they are K66, the only problem I would see arising would be 25-30 years down the road when we're all gone. If/when cushions are replaced and the mechanic assumes since it's a GC that it requires K55 and doesn't measure the cushions. The table would be back in the same predicament with balls hoping.
As usual, great work Glen!!!
A lot of you did not. Oh well. I did.I didn't want to name names and start another ruckus.
Hey Glen. How about cutting the new top rail long and then notching the subrail and it would be tied into both pieces? Like a king stud and a stud when building a header
Ron