Just heard that Diamond Tables has changed their rails. Does anyone know what exactly they changed about their rails??
Thanks!
Thanks!
I have a question---
Should rails be standardized? Not so much with a single manufacturer - but with "performance."
The same way golf balls have to have X amount of compression and Y depth of dimples --- should rails have between X and Y amount of rebound?
As rubber technology improves and rails become more efficient (bouncy), is that a good thing for pool? Should rails be standardized in performance and efficiency?
Not saying anything in particular with any table manufacturer, just speaking in general. What does everyone think? Should governing bodies specify performance ranges?
I have a question---
Should rails be standardized? Not so much with a single manufacturer - but with "performance."
The same way golf balls have to have X amount of compression and Y depth of dimples --- should rails have between X and Y amount of rebound?
As rubber technology improves and rails become more efficient (bouncy), is that a good thing for pool? Should rails be standardized in performance and efficiency?
Not saying anything in particular with any table manufacturer, just speaking in general. What does everyone think? Should governing bodies specify performance ranges?
I'm sure King Cobra, will post soon.
I'm not sure there's anyone, who knows more about Diamonds than Glenn.
hey cobra
when the rails come out. how much will it cost for the new rails? i have a 7 foot pro am.
thanks
scott
Should rails be standardized? Not so much with a single manufacturer - but with "performance."
I think the rubbers on the 7' have too much rebound. It's not comparable to the bed speed and you don't need to travel that far on a 7' anyway, makes for a strange game imo. Could this be the change Glenn?
I have a question---
Should rails be standardized? Not so much with a single manufacturer - but with "performance."
The same way golf balls have to have X amount of compression and Y depth of dimples --- should rails have between X and Y amount of rebound?
As rubber technology improves and rails become more efficient (bouncy), is that a good thing for pool? Should rails be standardized in performance and efficiency?
Not saying anything in particular with any table manufacturer, just speaking in general. What does everyone think? Should governing bodies specify performance ranges?
I have a question---
Should rails be standardized? Not so much with a single manufacturer - but with "performance."
The same way golf balls have to have X amount of compression and Y depth of dimples --- should rails have between X and Y amount of rebound?
As rubber technology improves and rails become more efficient (bouncy), is that a good thing for pool? Should rails be standardized in performance and efficiency?
Not saying anything in particular with any table manufacturer, just speaking in general. What does everyone think? Should governing bodies specify performance ranges?
I have a question---
Should rails be standardized? Not so much with a single manufacturer - but with "performance."
The same way golf balls have to have X amount of compression and Y depth of dimples --- should rails have between X and Y amount of rebound?
As rubber technology improves and rails become more efficient (bouncy), is that a good thing for pool? Should rails be standardized in performance and efficiency?
Not saying anything in particular with any table manufacturer, just speaking in general. What does everyone think? Should governing bodies specify performance ranges?
No, Diamond is not replacing the cushions on the 7ft's, I like them anyway, the change is not in replacing the cushions, but rather in how they play.![]()
Meaning the angle of the subrail's face is being changed ?
Joey~Just guessin' ~
hmmmm...a little more involved than that, but that's a part of it![]()