XOSPro,
You ask a pretty good question and I'll take a stab at this even though I see Gene has answered your question.
I think for better players ("Good Players"), seeing new methods to aim is kind of a redundancy and their improvement may be limited. Some of the "good players" already know how to make the shot and get shape regardless of how they aim. Sometimes, learning a new method to aim can cause some discomfort and may in fact initially cause some reduction in the quality of play.
If you're the person I think you are, I've met you and believe you would give an honest appraisal of Gene's Perfect Aim. I'm just guessing here, but I think you would listen and learn but it would be a difficult thing for you to change.
I've seen Perfect Aim, met Gene and talked to him on the phone and Perfect Aim and Gene Albrecht are the real deal.
I actually believe that different people "see" things differently. When Shooting Arts and I were experimenting with Perfect Aim, I was astonished that he and I actually saw things (shots) MUCH differently. The difference in how we see shots can account for much of the discrepancies in this and other aiming system reviews.
Some professional players aim at certain shots in a specific manner, different from the way other people aim at shots. Players move their head and eyes all over the place trying to find the Perfect Aim and it is my belief that it can be different for each of us. Perfect Aim can help you to find that "perfect place" for your eyes to be. More importantly, in my opinion, Gene is a TOP PLAYER, willing to share equally important information about how you can improve your game.
Gene is one of the few instructors out there who will answer any question that you have for free. In my opinion, it's not the smartest thing to do if you're trying to make a dollar but Gene will help you with all aspects of your game, not just how you aim.
I have so much fun learning how other people aim, execute and how they think about pool, I could not understand how anyone could pass up the opportunity to learn from Gene. I would venture to say that if you don't improve your aiming using Perfect Aim, you should attempt to learn what it is that Gene does that makes him a "good player", ok, "Top Player" and while your game may not be able to be improved much, a little tweak here and there can't hurt.
The other thing I've learned is that each of us has a particular way in which we understand things and learn things as well as teach things. Sometimes, a different person can be saying the same thing and it clicks with one person but not the other. I don't know if its the way people say it or the way the learner perceives the information at the point in time but the truth is I have heard basically the same information from different people but the information was communicated from one person in a manner in which I seemed to "get it", better.
Recently, I was teaching a brand new student of the game, how to aim. The student had been around the pool room for a couple of months and several people had attempted to teach him how to aim the shot. Cutting balls consistently was an impossibility. This was because he didn't understand what was being said to him. I use visualization techniques when I teach in addition to verbal instruction and
when he finally "got it", he looked like a neon sign. Keep in mind, that this kid had a composite score of 33 on his ACT tests (of which the maximum score is 36).
We are all individuals who often see, think, comprehend/understand and communicate differently and you may be able to "connect" with one person better than another.
This "difference" in each of us may account for the all of the hatred in the world as well.


I try to see the commonality in each of us because in spite of all of our differences, we are all still brothers and sisters with the same wants and needs and share more things in common than first glance is want to recognize.