you people want is to dumb down pool, lower the game to a standard level of mediocrity in order to give someone a shot to win.
Please explain
you people want is to dumb down pool, lower the game to a standard level of mediocrity in order to give someone a shot to win.
Ultimately, people play games as they "want to."
I think what most players "want" is to be able to make all shots, achieve pinpoint position, and generate clever and insightful table-play strategy. I don't think anyone wants to "dumb down" pool--because nobody can yet ACHIEVE perfection throughout an entire tournament, in the skills I've mentioned.
ALL games have to have rules, which are limitations. The vast majority of people want rules that make play "fair" between players within boundaries that test certain skills and not others.
So, is it "dumbing down" pool, for example, to have rules that say you can't let out a scream just as a player is about to hit the cue ball? Why isn't that "dumbing down" pool? Afterall, it would be possible to train yourself to be able to ignore such screams--so shouldn't the game go the player who can? No. Because pool players do not want to compete over that skill, or make it part of the game.
Similarly, most players have no interest in spending more time improving ways to "game" the break, and less on shot-making, position accuracy, and safety/strategy talents. If they DO spend inordinate time on "break research" it's because they have to, because of a "weakness" in the current rules that allow it to happen (such as pattern racking that APPEARS to be random).
...It is my belief that pattern racking shouldn't be outlawed or be made illegal. For what reason...
unfortunately unless you are playing BCA/WPA rules in a gambling match...its NOT illegal.
What you don't seem to understand is that pattern racking is ALREADY ILLEGAL and against the rules.
This is from BCA rules (emphasis is mine)
5.2 RACKING THE BALLS
The object balls are racked in a diamond shape, with the 1-ball at the top of the diamond and on the foot spot, the 9-ball in the center of the diamond, and the other balls in random order, racked as tightly as possible. The game begins with cue ball in hand behind the head string.
This is from WPA rules
2.2 Nine Ball Rack
The object balls are racked as tightly as possible in a diamond shape, with the one ball at the apex of the diamond and on the foot spot and the nine ball in the middle of the diamond. The other balls will be placed in the diamond without purposeful or intentional pattern.
Herein lies the problem... A good pattern racker will never be "caught" because he doesn't have to pattern rack every rack. If he only changes the position of one particular ball, can you tell if you've just been pattern racked? NO, you can't. What if he pattern racks one out of every four racks? Will you be able to tell? No. Paul's process doesn't care what your intentions are, it just allows enforcement of the rule.If I am playing a match where my opponent/someone else is racking for me. It is my job to inspect the rack and ensure that I am getting a "good" rack. It is my responsiblity as the breaker to ensure that they are not "intentionally" racking bad patterns etc. If I recognize that, I will speak up about it and call them out. These two scenarios are the same.
IMHO... If you agree to a "rack your own" match up. then it is exactly that. Rack Your Own. If you dont like pattern racking, then suggest a agreement where its rack your own without patterns. but it STILL comes down to being your own responsibilty to recognize it.
What you don't seem to understand is that pattern racking is ALREADY ILLEGAL and against the rules.
This is from BCA rules (emphasis is mine)
5.2 RACKING THE BALLS
The object balls are racked in a diamond shape, with the 1-ball at the top of the diamond and on the foot spot, the 9-ball in the center of the diamond, and the other balls in random order, racked as tightly as possible. The game begins with cue ball in hand behind the head string.
This is from WPA rules
2.2 Nine Ball Rack
The object balls are racked as tightly as possible in a diamond shape, with the one ball at the apex of the diamond and on the foot spot and the nine ball in the middle of the diamond. The other balls will be placed in the diamond without purposeful or intentional pattern.
I'm sure that there are alot of tournaments out there that play by either BCA or WPA rules, but how many tournaments have you seen where they actually stop the racker and say... "Hey, you've racked this order of balls the last 2 racks, you are now unable to rack this specific order... please adjust your order or be penalized"...
I believe that this rule was written quite a while back, before the true scope of what it means today could be realized. If you notice, most of the tournaments today have adapted by trying to enforce a certain break rule... i.e. no soft break, or a certain number of balls must past the head string...
I know of several tournaments in my area that say you must rack the 2 ball behind the 9 ball, or keep the 2 and 3 on the corners of a ten ball rack. This is done to protect against overly advantageous racking patterns... however after that it's just ludicrous to think that people are really going to sit there and police every single rack, write down patterns, the number of times it was used etc... it's just silly.
I don't think if the governing body were asked to re-word this rule they'd phrase it the same way. It's leading to too many issues. If this rule were worded in such a way that it didn't allow for a negative interpretation of "pattern racking" would you still object to the practice really?
.So to me it isn't even about how to prevent it. It is about the honor of each individual player..It is what it is.
Right, it is very difficult to detect or enforce even if detected. Besides perhaps pattern racking only every other rack, a player can also camouflage it by using more than one pattern and using the opposite pattern and breaking from the other side.
So to me it isn't even about how to prevent it. It is about the honor of each individual player. Knowing it is against the rules there are not only many people who do it, but admit to it. It really doesn't matter if you think it is a bad rule or an unenforceable rule. It is a rule, plain and simple. Either one plays by the rules or one doesn't. I guess there are a lot of pool players who simply take pride in cheating just because it can't be proved.
It is what it is.
When someone changes breaking positions it has nothing to do with masking patterns. It's a result of how the balls are touching in the rack and which four ball track is going to give you the wing ball in the corner.
I think that people are putting too much emphasis on the "pattern" that the balls are being racked. It really only is a small percentage thing. The most important aspect of racking your own is ensuring frozen ball tracks and ensuring you're going to get a good rack. If people wouldn't take it to the next level ad trying to find layouts that benefit them then no one would complain.
However that's the natural succession of things. I mean i started trying out patterns in ten ball the moment i started practicing my break. Naturally and without instruction from anyone else. I've been racking the same rack ever since. This is also with keeping the 2/3 on the corners. But really the order doesn't matter all that much because a player's only going to try and make a ball on the break and keep position on the one ball.
If you really want to stop someone from pattern racking you should pop them in the mouth one time. That'll bring an end to all that.
If it doesn't matter, why did you put so much time into it and why do you rack the balls in a chosen pattern every time?
It took me one session to figure out the pattern i liked, and about 30 mins. Incidentally Corey has since taken my pattern after him and I played and uses it all the time too... But i didn't put much time into it.
Why do i still do it, because it's a psychological comfort. One less thing to worry about and against the better players it settles me to know i have a known and proven approach when playing ten ball. This game is very mental so having a set order of balls just adds a little more psychological security...
Mikey: I'm sure doing what you described would do anything but put an end to the pattern racking... That kind of thing just isn't what pool is about or needs....