is there a general consensus as to whom makes the better quality table?
So has AE Schmidt and Brunswick but they're not really interested in the game, therefore the tables are inferior. Although Olhausen has made these for a long time on special order they've just recently started taking a harder look at this market. I wish them all the best in this. They as well as Diamond would be wise to get the input from the top players or IMO they'll be blowing in the wind.Olhausen has been making carom tables for a very long time, what do you think of those?
Steve said: I do not believe that Diamond would be after the same market for a 10' billiard table as they are for the 8/9' carom tables.
Me: precisely
Steve said: Anyone remember these posts by RCK?
Me: yes, and I spoke to him at length. I also spoke to one of the principal owners of Diamond. They seem reluctant.
Thanks Glen,
I appreciate your comments. Patience is a virtue. It can also be the wrong medicine for the times.
As you know, pool rooms have been decimated in the last 5 -10 years. I would venture to guess we've lost well over 50% of the pool rooms in this country.
I'm not suggesting building Diamond carom tables will reguvenate an anemic business climate for cue sports.
However, what I am suggesting is that Diamond "dance with them that brung ya".
Meaning.....Diamond went after the pro and avid pool players and stepped up to the plate by highlighting their equipment in almost every big tournament. That strategy has worked! Why reinvent that business model by building a 9ft carom table and a 10ft pool table.
Almost every professional carom tournament in the U.S and the world are played on 10ft tables.
Fair enough Bill. But why would they then plan to build a 10ft pool table?