How many of you think you can beat a professional player with this spot in a race to nine?
Combinations or caroms on the five or the nine after the break is not allowed.
Try it against the ghost and see how you do. I have not beaten the ghost in a race to five yet. Granted I rarely play these days but I certainly can run an open table. Yet, inexplicably I seem to actually get worse when I am trying to win with this spot.
Does getting a big spot make a player worse or somehow affect their judgement for the worse?
I've played a pro with the 5, no BIH, winner breaks, and broke even. Does that count?
I would play anyone who ever lived with that spot. You are forgetting, you don't have to run out every time to win, you also get the first defensive shot as well. Even if you are playing even, no matter who you are playing you will win still your share of games regardless, few matches are won say 11 to 0 even with a miss match of talent. A spot hopefully will tip the odds in your favor in terms of games won, you only have to get to 51%. Giving such a spot to anyone who can play a bit, no matter who the top player is would have a hard time staying even.
At best, the pro may eeak out a very small margin or games to win there will be no blowouts. You may be surprised, spot like that takes a toll on the pro as well, you may out last him.
There has always been, and still are, gamblers of average skills who liked to play top players with big spots usually for big money. When you sweat those matches it can be surprising what that big spot does.
Depends on the pro. The top tier pros can give the bottom tier pros the 5 and still be the favorite.
Depends on the pro. The top tier pros can give the bottom tier pros the 5 and still be the favorite.
Depends on the pro. The top tier pros can give the bottom tier pros the 5 and still be the favorite.
Crazy statement of the year.
Crazy statement of the year.
Crazy statement of the year.
Totally agree !!
Just for the record, get ahold of anyone that will give me that, and I will take that weight. Anyone !!!
That one and the one Chris_Horton made just below that saying SVB isn't near as good as Earl, Efren, or Busty. Who, other than him, doesn't consider Shane an elite level pro?
Ok, I have to disagree here a little bit. Chris Bartram would by everyone's definition be a pro and look at the weight Orcullo gives him and Orcullo has won convincingly a couple times.
If you stretch the pro player definition to someone like Scooter Goodman or Jonathan Tedder who have never had a job other than pool for more than a month, then there are a few pros who could give up the 5 ball and rob them.
Shane is an awesome player! Not saying he is a bad pro. But that is my point, who is a low level pro ?
I have seen not-as-well-known pro's like Rob Saez play just as good as Earl can.
Who is a bottom-Tier pro so to say ? The only difference there could be is consistency, break ability, and safety abilities. Those could be the only thing that hold apart those skills. And needless to say, if you are a pro, you can handle your own when it comes to these.
Shane is an awesome player! Not saying he is a bad pro. But that is my point, who is a low level pro ?
I have seen not-as-well-known pro's like Rob Saez play just as good as Earl can.
Who is a bottom-Tier pro so to say ? The only difference there could be is consistency, break ability, and safety abilities. Those could be the only thing that hold apart those skills. And needless to say, if you are a pro, you can handle your own when it comes to these.
Rob Saez is not a lower tier pro. He's somewhere in the middle.
That doesn't make any sense to me. A top pro, Earl or Efren or Bustamante, versus a lower end Pro ? Who is a lower end Pro ? SVB isn't as good as any one of them, but they certainly cant give him that weight. Rob Saez ( another good friend of mine) isn't as consistent as these guys, but they couldn't ever give him that weight. A top pro could possibly give that to what I would call an above average player. Meaning the consistency of running out would be around 3-5 racks broke and ran out of 10. I'd say that because most of the problems with running out are in the first 5 balls.
Ok, I have to disagree here a little bit. Chris Bartram would by everyone's definition be a pro and look at the weight Orcullo gives him and Orcullo has won convincingly a couple times.
I think he means shortstop level players when he says "lower level pro". And in that case I would have to agree. I saw Parica once give Frankie Hernandez the 6 and rob him. I saw Marcus Chamat give L'il John the 6 and I believe they broke even. In the mid 90's Mark Tadd gave Ginky the 6 and they broke even, this was before Ginky reached his full potential of course but he was already better than a shortstop at that point. I remember Frankie Hernandez saying something like "When you're playing someone at that level it's a race to the one ball...the spot doesn't mean as much as you might think."