Yikes! :embarrassed2:
Surely, you've heard of T-hose, haven't you?![]()
T Wheels little brother? LOL!!
In all these years, this was the first mistake I have seen from you. I feel like I should go buy a lottery ticket now!
Yikes! :embarrassed2:
Surely, you've heard of T-hose, haven't you?![]()
The concept of not getting paid here is really beat to death. The thing that I think that is hardly said is the fact that only the very top finishers are not getting paid on the spot. So for all the players grinding out the expenses to get there, they are getting paid when they get in the cash. There are no guarantees to win an event like this or get top 3. So if someone is counting on a top 3 finish money at the end of the week to not be in a bind with life then they should rethink the whole process.
Which scenario is better?
a. Get paid your 2500.00 on the spot because you min cashed
b. Wait 3 months to get 40,000.00 because you won the event
c. Win event and get 2500.00 on the spot (or some relative number) and get remainder of 40k within x days guaranteed.
I don't see the problem here as long as every penny has been paid out. I had to wait almost a month to get a pretty big check offline from a poker tourney win....do you think I was pissed or happy that I had that cash coming?
~Perk
really? "hundreds" of amateur players that play as well as JA, SVB, efren, mika et all? really?
brian
Maybe not hundreds but a great few out there can play Jam up pool with the best of em!!!...
Considering the list the answer is yes. The majority of the players on the list are unknown and could not win the US Open on a bet. They could be replaced with equal if not better unknowns that play today all over the country.really? "hundreds" of amateur players that play as well as JA, SVB, efren, mika et all? really?
brian
Disagree..... Barry had to scratch until the last minute to get 256 last year...... If they boycott the title might as well have an asterisk beside it because it's not a true US Open field..... Remember when the NFL had "replacement players".....Not to mention ticket sales..... Ask yourselves who draws the biggest crowds each year and then look down that list....Outside of Earl there most of the big draws are part of the ABP...... I understand both sides stances but have to give the upper hand to the ABP.
At VF this year I was watching the straight pool challenge and a couple TAP players walked up to watch for a minute or two. They had no clue who Alex Pagulayan and Mika Immonen were that were hitting balls at that point were. I think the US Open will go on and be just fine even if certain players don't show up.
With that said, last weekend at a tourney in Maryland I overheard quite a bit of conversation about this topic. So pool players and fans outside of just AZ are in fact discussing this issue.
while this and other comments are of course true, the question raised is whats best for pool? i just dont see how having the best players not play is good for pool. on the golf/Tiger analogy, while you are correct that others did rise to the top (i mean someone has to win right?), no one is dominant in the way he was and i believe that it was commentary during the us open that since Tiger hasnt been playing that golf's ratings have been down.
brian
question raised is whats best for pool? i just dont see how having the best players not play is good for pool
brian
Brian, I am not sure anyone actually believes this is good for pool. When both sides are anchoring down its for their best interests, not for the overall state of pool. This is just an example of history repeating itself yet again. In this instance its easy to see valid issues for both sides which is why this is such a heated topic among the pool community.
I am in the opinion that there really is not a strong enough brand with pool to where the impact will be similar to your Tiger analogy.
~Perk
The concept of not getting paid here is really beat to death. The thing that I think that is hardly said is the fact that only the very top finishers are not getting paid on the spot. So for all the players grinding out the expenses to get there, they are getting paid when they get in the cash. There are no guarantees to win an event like this or get top 3. So if someone is counting on a top 3 finish money at the end of the week to not be in a bind with life then they should rethink the whole process.
Which scenario is better?
a. Get paid your 2500.00 on the spot because you min cashed
b. Wait 3 months to get 40,000.00 because you won the event
c. Win event and get 2500.00 on the spot (or some relative number) and get remainder of 40k within x days guaranteed.
I don't see the problem here as long as every penny has been paid out. I had to wait almost a month to get a pretty big check offline from a poker tourney win....do you think I was pissed or happy that I had that cash coming?
~Perk
Now I'm curious. What exactly do the pros put on thier W-2's in the 'occupation' column ?...But if the pros list "professional pool player as thier occupation", then (unlike us amateurs) don't they get to claim these expenses on thier tax returns ?
It is certainly best if all the top players play, at least from a fans point of view, but if for some reason be it illness, or personal matters they can't, they are not essential. The US Open is a real happening event, it is greater then the sum total of it's parts. Anyone who goes will leave thrilled and entertained with stories they will tell for years."Probaly will be the best thing for pool if you all dont show."-from OP
i agree with the points you have made Perk, but the OP did say that it would better for pool if the top players didnt play, so again i really cant see how its better if the top players dont play.
macguy-in every generation great players are superceded by those of the next generation. i get that. however as a fan of the game if i am going to travel and expend resources i want to see the "name" players and if i get so see "the next player" then thats a bonus. isnt that whats good for the game?
brian
I appreciate your thoughts, but I totally disagree. There are many tournaments held today in which the so-called "pros" have to spot the lesser skilled players in the event. Everybody loves to pull for the underdog. Well, at least I know I do.
With the lady pros attending the U.S. Open 9-Ball Championship, there will still be first-class talent in the house. Whenever I have been to a mixed pool tournament, such as, say, Joss/Turning Stone in Verona, NY, everybody in the crowds most definitely is pulling for the ladies, sweating their matches, not giving the so-called "male pros" very much attention. Even the people that work at the casino come to the arena to watch the lady pros strut their stuff on a field of green. They're a big attraction.
If the ABP doesn't show this year, there will still be Earl and t hose who follow the beat of their own drum that will show up to play pool. Barry should get rid of all seeding and free entry fees from here on in. He should also raise the entry free for anybody associated with the ABP to $600, if paid early, and $700 on the day of the event for all the grief and drama this whole brouhaha is causing. JMHO, FWIW! :smile:
Jam.... I guess we will just have to agree to disagree. I was at the Open last year and as much as I agree that the women are a somewhat larger draw I don't think it is going to make up for the lack of top pro's. Last year there were only a handful of women playing anyway and a good portion had their entry fees paid for by JR.....you did have Sarah Rousey and Gerda as a couple of the main attractions but after that, say Earl gets knocked out early, are there really that many people that want to watch Mike Dechaine and Shawn Wilkie battle it out? Any tournament without Efren just isn't the same see Derby 2011. Plus you will be missing the defending champions from the last 4 years. I think if you and Keith were still waiting for a $10,000 check from March that was "In the mail" you might have a different viewpoint. JMHO
Dave