I showed this video to some buddys and they swear it cannot be down. Just curios if it is actually possible. Bob you can chime in too! And maybe elaborate how to do it so I can put someones foot in their mouth.
http://youtu.be/GaSKh1PSqok
The shot is similar to Joe Tucker's demo of Vernon Elliott's bank shot in
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ql-vXWEA_TU which is shown in high-speed video by Dr. Dave in
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJSVWvn_gpA
Both of the shots require dirty balls, or at least balls that are not freshly cleaned and polished. I've played in pool halls where all the balls would work find for these shots.
The trick is that when the cue ball strikes the object ball, the point on the cue ball that touches the object ball has to be moving backward. This is not just a little "outside" spin. This is more side spin than 99.9% of pool players ever put on the cue ball (at least intentionally). Without that much spin, the ball cannot be thrown backward.
The shot is not actually the thinnest possible cut -- you have to hit the ball thinly but not paper thin. In Dr. Dave's video, you can see the angle that the cue ball takes coming off the object ball and that tells you directly how much of the ball was struck. You can also see that the object ball is moving back up the table (a little).
The actual cut angle on the spot shot in Peer Landa's video is about 93 degrees. One of the shots in that video is hit too thinly and the object ball goes towards a spot about half a diamond from the pocket on the tough side, but it only goes about a foot.
If someone wants to bet, this is a one hour shot for me. I get an hour and you don't get to complain about the cleanliness of the balls. The fewest tries it ever took me was two. That time, BumpyPickle complained to me that his arm was sore from having tried the shot for over an hour, and asked me to show him the shot again. Like most shots, it's easier if you visualize and don't think.