Sloppy and incompetent work by Jim Pierce, poor customer service

Is it possible that the cue was in this shape before you sent it to Jim? It seems reasonable that the multiple previous repairs could have caused it. Hope you guys are able to work it out.

The cue came out of the Bert Kellerman collection (probably one of the largest cue collections in the world). He was the original owner, I don't believe the cue had never been worked on prior to sending to Jim.
 
Yep, nobody is perfect, but some people will do the right thing to correct their mistakes.

And those that correct them will sometimes even have an attempt to burn them at the stake, won't they?

Sorry you have a bum cue, hope it works out. Wheeler is good people and builds a quality cue.
 
Guys, I don't know any cuemaker (which I regret btw) but I have a proposition for them. Take 5-10 pictures to a cue you've received for refinish or any other work. Also do this when the cue leaves your workshop. It takes 10 minutes at most but you will be secured and none of this will pop up here. Consider this as a coffee or smoke break. It's fun to make pictures, believe me and helpful.

Just a simple "advice".

All the best,

Chris

Great advice! Also good advice for the owner to do the same.
 
After reading every post in this thread, it seems to me that what started out as several good reasons for NOT doing business with this cue maker, has, at this point, turned into a lot of reasons FOR doing business with him. All the testimonials, and Jim's very credible post, lead me to believe Jim's side of this dispute.

Ok, fair enough, I guess the photo's I provided that show damage don't mean anything to you?

Good luck with any of your future dealings with Jim Pierce.
 
Well, I have to concur with those supporters of Jim. I have been working with Jim on several cues for the last several months...a couple of them near completion now. Jim has not only been extremely communicative throughout the whole process, but he has been the one to initiate contact on numerous occasions to keep me updated on the progress of the cues.

As far as the playability of his own cues...they are some of the BEST playing cues I've had in my hands...and for that alone, I have no problem supporting him!

As far as his "bowling alley wood" shafts...I've gone so far as sending him another cuemakers cue to match his shaft onto the other's butt...they play THAT MUCH BETTER.

Of course playability of cues is completely opinionated...we all know that...but the fact that so many people have voiced their opinions regarding Jim's attention to detail and his desire to constantly go above and beyond what most other cuemakers do for their customers, speaks volumes to me about Jim the "man" not just Jim the "cuemaker"!

Jason
 
What would be the correct thing in your opinion for Jim to do?

Have you had the cue repaired previously?

No I did not have the cue repaired previously. As mentioned above it came from the Bert Kellerman collection. I feel confident that the cue had never had any other work done on it.

Initially I asked that Jim Pierce buy the cue from me at the amount that I paid for it. I would return the cue to him and he could do what he wanted with it.

Jim responded with trying to get Mike Wheeler to fix it (Jim would pay) and I would pay Jim for the "work" that he did. The trouble with this is that Mike was not sure he could even make the repair, because he was not sure he had the necessary inlay material to recreate the butt. Much less the forearm issuee....

My last offer to Jim was to ask for $500 to compensate me for the damage that he did to the cue. My next intent is to put the cue up for sale on the forum. I suspect, due to its current condition, that it will probably bring at most maybe $400. It will be a loss all the way around.
 
And those that correct them will sometimes even have an attempt to burn them at the stake, won't they?

Sorry you have a bum cue, hope it works out. Wheeler is good people and builds a quality cue.

Wheeler's super. Thanks for your comment.
 
I'm really glad, that things worked out for you and others. I've had pm's from people that have indicated otherwise. It would be nice if they would contribute to this thread, but I respect their privacy.

As to the bowling alley shafts.....hit is interely subjective.


Well, I have to concur with those supporters of Jim. I have been working with Jim on several cues for the last several months...a couple of them near completion now. Jim has not only been extremely communicative throughout the whole process, but he has been the one to initiate contact on numerous occasions to keep me updated on the progress of the cues.

As far as the playability of his own cues...they are some of the BEST playing cues I've had in my hands...and for that alone, I have no problem supporting him!

As far as his "bowling alley wood" shafts...I've gone so far as sending him another cuemakers cue to match his shaft onto the other's butt...they play THAT MUCH BETTER.

Of course playability of cues is completely opinionated...we all know that...but the fact that so many people have voiced their opinions regarding Jim's attention to detail and his desire to constantly go above and beyond what most other cuemakers do for their customers, speaks volumes to me about Jim the "man" not just Jim the "cuemaker"!

Jason
 
People are only talking about the refinish on the cue, wasn't the new shaft also built poorly?

The shaft was built OK. The only issues where that it did not fit tightly on the joint screw (lose). And the diameter of the shaft was larger than the joint diameter on the butt. Hardly anything to get upset about, but just some of the other many little issues that I had with the cue.
 
The shaft was built OK. The only issues where that it did not fit tightly on the joint screw (lose). And the diameter of the shaft was larger than the joint diameter on the butt. Hardly anything to get upset about, but just some of the other many little issues that I had with the cue.

A shaft, when built when the cue was in his shop should not have any problems. I'm not gonna bother digging for the posts, but I've read to many not positive comments about Pierce cues that the one I had my eye on, I no longer have my eye on it.
 
I'll offer more than it is worth!

No I did not have the cue repaired previously. As mentioned above it came from the Bert Kellerman collection. I feel confident that the cue had never had any other work done on it.

Initially I asked that Jim Pierce buy the cue from me at the amount that I paid for it. I would return the cue to him and he could do what he wanted with it.

Jim responded with trying to get Mike Wheeler to fix it (Jim would pay) and I would pay Jim for the "work" that he did. The trouble with this is that Mike was not sure he could even make the repair, because he was not sure he had the necessary inlay material to recreate the butt. Much less the forearm issuee....

My last offer to Jim was to ask for $500 to compensate me for the damage that he did to the cue. My next intent is to put the cue up for sale on the forum. I suspect, due to its current condition, that it will probably bring at most maybe $400. It will be a loss all the way around.


Tell you what, I'll help out on this deal. For the cue and the three shafts including the brand new shaft made from bowling alley wood I'm prepared to pay $410 plus shipping. I assume you will jump all over this since it is more than the most you hoped to get for the cue.

Hu
 
Responses in Red......

Doug/Salamander,

The turnaround time for the work on your cue was definitely not a fast as you, or I, would have hoped for.

I'll say. Promised 2 to 3 weeks....took 3&1/2 months

I received some mixed messages from you during the course of our communication. On one hand, you told me not to stress too much over the turnaround time for the work on your cue. On the other hand, I received plenty of other messages from you constantly checking on the progress being made on your cue.

I felt bad for you because of your illness, and told you to please not rush my cue. Health comes first. I sent you emails occasionally asking for progress updates. I was never insistent about getting the cue back until you said it was done and never sent it.

As many of you are aware, I have had some health issues which put me behind in my work and I have been struggling to get and stay healthy while still getting work done in a timely manner.

Health comes first

Addressing the work...

When you sent me this cue, you told me you didn't like the way the cue played and wanted one of my bowling alley shafts. Additionally, you characterized the Mike Wheeler shafts taper as being "wavy and inconsistent", saying they "hit poorly", and asked me to retaper them with my own taper as well as change the ferrules.

That is not true. I very much liked the way the cue played. The ferrules on both shafts were slightly raised above the shaft wood, which I asked you to make "flush". The tips were shot and needed to be replaced. There were some "waves" in the shaft which I asked you to remove. Which you did. I absolutely did not ask you to retaper the shafts to your taper. We agreed that the ferrules should be replaced.

I noticed in the Cue Review section you posted some negative opinions about the quality of my shafts and how my taper plays.

Jose Parica, Rodney Morris, and Amar Kang play with my cues and are all very happy with the quality, playability, and shaft taper. But what do they know?

Yes, I did not care for the quality of your shaft wood, nor did I like the way this shaft plays. As I mentioned in the other post, "hit" is interely subjective.

Originally, you told me that my wrap job was one of the best you had ever seen.

The way the wrap feels and looks is probably one of the best I've ever seen. Bravo!! To bad you cut the wrap groove to deep and butchered the butt sleeve.

But my question is how long were your "before" pictures (showing the ring) actually taken prior to you sending me the cue. I ask this because there were 4 other holes in the wrap channel for the Linen. In other words, this cue has been worked on at least 4 other times before you sent it to me.

I don't believe the cue was ever worked on before I sent it to you. It came out of the Bert Kellerman collection, and the cue was made for him. The "before" pictures were taken probably a month or two before I sent the cue to you. All of the pictures were taken on the same home table as the "after" pictures. Some of those same "before" pictures can be found on an ad in the for sale section of Azbilliards....look them up the dates are posted.

I cannot tell you with 100% certainty that I did not touch the ring.

That's an understatement. You cut right into that bad boy. You also cut slightly less than 1mm out of the ring at the top of the wrap as well. :angry:

However, I can tell you with 100% certainty that the area near the joint I did NOT touch.

Maybe, maybe not. Mike Wheeler and I feel otherwise.

Again, the 4 other holes in the wrap area tell me that this cue has been worked on several times before me.

I don't believe that. Regardless, you caused the ring issues for sure. My photo's dated on the for sale section prove that. The cue has not left my possession since I bought it from the Kellerman auction....except to be butchered by you.


Customer Service...

To this date you have sent me absolutely ZERO dollars for working on your cue. I did not, and have not, taken any money up front for the repair work done on your cue. I guess when talking about my "customer service" you forgot to mention the part where I said you could pay me for the repair work after you had the cue back in your hands.

I think that is a great policy to have. Throughout this process, if you will recall, I asked you repeatedly how you wanted to be paid and where to send the money, prior to the cue being finished. I certainly do NOT intend to send you a nickel for the crap work that you did on this cue. The cue has lost the majority of its value and will cost me dearly

I have offered to make things right multiple times.

You made 1 offer

I offered for you to send the cue (and the money you were supposed to have paid me for the work) to Mike Wheeler, and I would send additional money to cover the difference.

That is not reasonable given what Mike Wheeler told me. According to him, this is increasing doubt that the butt sleeve could be recreated because he might not have the necessary inlay material. Plus, Mike and I feel strongly that you caused the dishing/hour glass by the joint, which cannot be corrected.

You refused, insisting that you would take nothing less than your original purchase price of the cue, $1375.

Now you are lying. I originally asked that you pay for the cue and I would send it to you. When you refused I stated that you could at the very least send me $500 to help cover the loss that I would incure from your botched work. I will be glad to post emails of this!

I have built over 500 cues and done repair and refinish work on all sorts of custom cues, including Southwest, Josswest, Szamboti and many others. I am a fan of Mike Wheeler's cues and took the utmost care when doing the work on your cue. However, I am shocked and saddened at the way things have turned out.

You and me both. I'm sick about it.

At this point, the impression you are giving me is that you were looking for me to "buy" a cue that you were unhappy with in the first place.

I loved that cue, and sent it to you to make it perfect again as a keeper

Jim Pierce
 
A shaft, when built when the cue was in his shop should not have any problems. I'm not gonna bother digging for the posts, but I've read to many not positive comments about Pierce cues that the one I had my eye on, I no longer have my eye on it.

My thoughts as well.
 
Tell you what, I'll help out on this deal. For the cue and the three shafts including the brand new shaft made from bowling alley wood I'm prepared to pay $410 plus shipping. I assume you will jump all over this since it is more than the most you hoped to get for the cue.

Hu

Hu,

I'll tell you what, unless Jim Pierce comes up with a better solution, or someone comes up with a better offer, I very well might sell to you. Were you being sarcastic, or is this a legitimate offer? I have paperwork showing I paid $1,375, and Mike Wheeler would charge over $1,700 for the cue with 3 shafts.

If I do sell to you, it is strickly "as is", no returns....you are now aware of the crap work that Jim Pierce performed on this cue.
 
I personally know Jim and own two of his cues. He has always been extremely accommodating to me and gone above and beyond my expectations. I've also been to his shop and reviewed his cue building and cue repair process which proved to me he is very competent at what he does for a living.
 
I personally know Jim and own two of his cues. He has always been extremely accommodating to me and gone above and beyond my expectations. I've also been to his shop and reviewed his cue building and cue repair process which proved to me he is very competent at what he does for a living.

I'm glad it did not happen to you.
 
Personally, I doubt that Jim would have any reason to cut the wrap groove any deeper. I can see the rim that you mentioned. It just looks like the linen
is lower at the star of the wrap. Maybe pressed a bit too much.

I have pressed a wrap too much myself. All I do is spray the linen a tad and let it expand again and re press at the edge to even it.

In the pic of the fore arm where you can see light under it. If you turn the fore arm 180 degress, can you see light under it too. You mentioned that
it is like and hour glass figure. Just wondering if the hour glass figure is even all the way around and it is the taper that Mike does.

It might sound kind of funny but if the wrap isn't totally even, it can make the fore arm look like it has a slight wobble. I have one or two like that. I can't tell as I am not there so just going on your description of the problem. Once the shaft is screwed on, the tip doesn't leave the table so all is good.

Building a cue can be rocket science and it isn't rocket science at the same time.
I have hand sanded shafts that are pretty much 100% perfect and I have done others that have a roll to them. I don't have a machine dedicated to tapering shafts so I have to do the best I can with my eyes and hands.

Most of my shafts have a slight roll to them. Even the Predators and production cues. In the long run, if the tip doesn't leave the table, no worries.
 
Last edited:
Personally, I doubt that Jim would have any reason to cut the wrap groove any deeper. I can see the rim that you mentioned. It just looks like the linen
is lower at the star of the wrap. Maybe pressed a bit too much.

I have pressed a wrap too much myself. All I do is spray the linen a tad and let it expand again and re press at the edge to even it.

In the pic of the fore arm where you can see light under it. If you turn the fore arm 180 degress, can you see light under it too. You mentioned that
it is like and hour glass figure. Just wondering if the hour glass figure is even all the way around and it is the taper that Mike does.

The edge at the bottom of the wrap is raw and ragged. Who knows why he would have cut the wrap groove deeper. This is how the cue arrived to me. Yes you can see light under the joint all the way around. It is an hour glass shape, and no Mike Wheeler does not cut his cues that way. My other Mike Wheeler, made the same year, is perfect there.
 
Guys, I don't know any cuemaker (which I regret btw) but I have a proposition for them. Take 5-10 pictures to a cue you've received for refinish or any other work. Also do this when the cue leaves your workshop. It takes 10 minutes at most but you will be secured and none of this will pop up here. Consider this as a coffee or smoke break. It's fun to make pictures, believe me and helpful.

Just a simple "advice".

All the best,

Chris

Thank you...you beat me to it. I was thinking of posting the same thing until I read your post.

I HONESTLY don't know what the big deal is with these types of situations, because they can be avoided rather easily by doing just what you said.

The insurance companies do this all the time. If your car is damaged, they take pictures and then have it fixed to (hopefully) the condition it was in before the damage occurred.

EVERY time I send ANYTHING, I take pictures of it just in case somebody disputes the condition of the item. I would suggest the RECEIVER of an item do the same thing, so comparisons can be made if there is ever any question of who is right or who is wrong.

It only takes a few minutes to take pictures, so lack of time is not a credible excuse if you ask me. If a cue maker thinks it is time consuming, then they should build an extra $5 or so into their costs for their time.
 
Back
Top