Doug/Salamander,
The turnaround time for the work on your cue was definitely not a fast as you, or I, would have hoped for.
I'll say. Promised 2 to 3 weeks....took 3&1/2 months
I received some mixed messages from you during the course of our communication. On one hand, you told me not to stress too much over the turnaround time for the work on your cue. On the other hand, I received plenty of other messages from you constantly checking on the progress being made on your cue.
I felt bad for you because of your illness, and told you to please not rush my cue. Health comes first. I sent you emails occasionally asking for progress updates. I was never insistent about getting the cue back until you said it was done and never sent it.
As many of you are aware, I have had some health issues which put me behind in my work and I have been struggling to get and stay healthy while still getting work done in a timely manner.
Health comes first
Addressing the work...
When you sent me this cue, you told me you didn't like the way the cue played and wanted one of my bowling alley shafts. Additionally, you characterized the Mike Wheeler shafts taper as being "wavy and inconsistent", saying they "hit poorly", and asked me to retaper them with my own taper as well as change the ferrules.
That is not true. I very much liked the way the cue played. The ferrules on both shafts were slightly raised above the shaft wood, which I asked you to make "flush". The tips were shot and needed to be replaced. There were some "waves" in the shaft which I asked you to remove. Which you did. I absolutely did not ask you to retaper the shafts to your taper. We agreed that the ferrules should be replaced.
I noticed in the Cue Review section you posted some negative opinions about the quality of my shafts and how my taper plays.
Jose Parica, Rodney Morris, and Amar Kang play with my cues and are all very happy with the quality, playability, and shaft taper. But what do they know?
Yes, I did not care for the quality of your shaft wood, nor did I like the way this shaft plays. As I mentioned in the other post, "hit" is interely subjective.
Originally, you told me that my wrap job was one of the best you had ever seen.
The way the wrap feels and looks is probably one of the best I've ever seen. Bravo!! To bad you cut the wrap groove to deep and butchered the butt sleeve.
But my question is how long were your "before" pictures (showing the ring) actually taken prior to you sending me the cue. I ask this because there were 4 other holes in the wrap channel for the Linen. In other words, this cue has been worked on at least 4 other times before you sent it to me.
I don't believe the cue was ever worked on before I sent it to you. It came out of the Bert Kellerman collection, and the cue was made for him. The "before" pictures were taken probably a month or two before I sent the cue to you. All of the pictures were taken on the same home table as the "after" pictures. Some of those same "before" pictures can be found on an ad in the for sale section of Azbilliards....look them up the dates are posted.
I cannot tell you with 100% certainty that I did not touch the ring.
That's an understatement. You cut right into that bad boy. You also cut slightly less than 1mm out of the ring at the top of the wrap as well. :angry:
However, I can tell you with 100% certainty that the area near the joint I did NOT touch.
Maybe, maybe not. Mike Wheeler and I feel otherwise.
Again, the 4 other holes in the wrap area tell me that this cue has been worked on several times before me.
I don't believe that. Regardless, you caused the ring issues for sure. My photo's dated on the for sale section prove that. The cue has not left my possession since I bought it from the Kellerman auction....except to be butchered by you.
Customer Service...
To this date you have sent me absolutely ZERO dollars for working on your cue. I did not, and have not, taken any money up front for the repair work done on your cue. I guess when talking about my "customer service" you forgot to mention the part where I said you could pay me for the repair work after you had the cue back in your hands.
I think that is a great policy to have. Throughout this process, if you will recall, I asked you repeatedly how you wanted to be paid and where to send the money, prior to the cue being finished. I certainly do NOT intend to send you a nickel for the crap work that you did on this cue. The cue has lost the majority of its value and will cost me dearly
I have offered to make things right multiple times.
You made 1 offer
I offered for you to send the cue (and the money you were supposed to have paid me for the work) to Mike Wheeler, and I would send additional money to cover the difference.
That is not reasonable given what Mike Wheeler told me. According to him, this is increasing doubt that the butt sleeve could be recreated because he might not have the necessary inlay material. Plus, Mike and I feel strongly that you caused the dishing/hour glass by the joint, which cannot be corrected.
You refused, insisting that you would take nothing less than your original purchase price of the cue, $1375.
Now you are lying. I originally asked that you pay for the cue and I would send it to you. When you refused I stated that you could at the very least send me $500 to help cover the loss that I would incure from your botched work. I will be glad to post emails of this!
I have built over 500 cues and done repair and refinish work on all sorts of custom cues, including Southwest, Josswest, Szamboti and many others. I am a fan of Mike Wheeler's cues and took the utmost care when doing the work on your cue. However, I am shocked and saddened at the way things have turned out.
You and me both. I'm sick about it.
At this point, the impression you are giving me is that you were looking for me to "buy" a cue that you were unhappy with in the first place.
I loved that cue, and sent it to you to make it perfect again as a keeper
Jim Pierce