I don't quite understand how my post sparked this question. The only mention I had of price was that for a cue maker to offer a lifetime warranty on their shafts not warping, they would have to set aside some of their profits for replacements which would lead to an increase in the price of their cues or a loss of profit.
My argument that the cue maker should share the price of a replacement shaft with the owner was based on the assumption that shafts may warp because of the cue maker or the owner. If you are saying that it is always because of the cue maker, then it would make sense for them to replace it without charge.
I didn't mention anything about inlays or butt warp since I don't know much about the possible causes of those, but I would guess that those also could be traced to construction or neglect.
In any case, it's up to the cue maker whether or not they offer a warranty on any or all of the cue, and to what extent. If I got a cue with a warranty, I would expect it to cost more than a comparable cue without a warranty.
Got it. Well I think that all cue makers should be clear about what their policy is and how they handle claims. Furthermore the ACA should develop some guidelines as to handling cues and allow everyone to post it on their sites.