Thats because the question was if she could compete against the TOP male pros in 9-ball with a designated breaker PERIOD.
It was not "Do you think XTP could compete with the top male pros if she had a designated breaker and if the races were short enough and if the pockets were not too small and if the male player scratches on a couple of his breaks and is just getting over a case of the flu and..."
It was VERY CLEARLY a question that asked if XTP in fact shoots as well as the TOP make pros in the game and her only weakness relative to them is the break shot.
It was YOU who spun the question into something else.
Who gives a crap if they can win a tournament match? Emile Rivera from Australia who I used to play for cash took out Earl in a WPC match once and it does not come even CLOSE to meaning he is as good as Earl in any way concievable. I beat Tyler Edey for cash once, I beat Adam smith in a mini in Vegas, you know what that means in the grand scheme of things, diddly squat. And that is what you are giving us Jay.
We KNOW the women have a chance to snap off a short single tournament match, so do about 5000 male players who almost knows who the heck they even are. Who really gives a crap about that? Seriously?
Well EXCUSSSSSE ME! I read the OP questions and only wanted to point out that imo some of the top women don't need a designated breaker (or anything else) to win MATCHES (plural) from top men players. I'm sorry if I didn't address his question in a way that pleased you. These kind of things seem to happen quite often on threads but maybe you hadn't noticed.
I didn't really want to get into the question of money games because that becomes purely speculation, since we all know that very few women are into gambling. But there are quite a few women who are willing and able to play against men in tournaments, so that does have some relevance here and it can be tested. Talking about gambling with women who we know don't gamble is just so much chest pounding imo. Feel free if it makes you feel good.
Tournaments are not easy to play in and the matches aren't that short in major events. To me it's a real test of a player's skills to see how deep they can go. There is no question in my mind that the better players are the ones who are there at the end. I continue to believe that given the opportunity, there are already several women players who could do just that. That's my response to the OP's question whether you like it or not.
As for me I would much rather see eight or ten of the best women players in the world competing head to head against the men in tournament play. That would be interesting, relevant and damn exciting. And it might just be the shot in the arm that professional pool needs. Those of you who only want to see a money match between a girl and guy I refer you to Jeanette Lee. She is always armed and ready for action. I'm not so sure that Chris would like to play her an all-around match consisting of 9-Ball, One Pocket, 14.1 and Banks. He might be able to make that game and you and all the other macho guys can make a bet on him. I think my money would be on the girl!
Have a great day and remember to keep it nice. :smile: