Over the years I've accepted that one cue isn't as good as another, having a cue with the right weight, diameter, etc. matters, as does LD vs. no LD. Duh, right?
But I'm still not sure how important the tip is.
I just accept whatever tip comes on the shaft, I don't find one tip miscues more than another. In fact I'm not sure I can feel the difference at all just by hitting, except when a tip is obviously very hard (like phenolic).
I dunno if I could pass a pepsi challenge hitting with brand A vs brand B, or medium vs. soft.
On paper, it's the only part that touches the CB, so it sounds important, but I can't help wondering if some players just talk themselves into thinking they really play any differently. Has anyone ever tracked in a semi-scientific way an improvement (or decrease) in their performance after switching tips?
But I'm still not sure how important the tip is.
I just accept whatever tip comes on the shaft, I don't find one tip miscues more than another. In fact I'm not sure I can feel the difference at all just by hitting, except when a tip is obviously very hard (like phenolic).
I dunno if I could pass a pepsi challenge hitting with brand A vs brand B, or medium vs. soft.
On paper, it's the only part that touches the CB, so it sounds important, but I can't help wondering if some players just talk themselves into thinking they really play any differently. Has anyone ever tracked in a semi-scientific way an improvement (or decrease) in their performance after switching tips?