EINSTEIN NINE, anyone play this game? Thoughts? Sounds like 1-pocket w/9 balls. Is that about right?
I'd be game to give it a try, but I'm a little skeptical. I'm not sure they thought this through. "What if we mixed 9 ball with 1 pocket?" ...well, you mix the slowest game with the fastest one and you get... something else. For one thing, why are there two winning conditions (make the 9, or make 5 balls in your hole)?
It sounds like it would devolve into both players softly banking the lowest numbered ball towards their hole until one of them sinks it (or puts it so deep in the hole it can't be dug out). And do you hard break or soft break? The breaker has a big edge... with a full rack game you might make a ball in the corner, but with a standard 9 ball rack it's virtually guaranteed. Breaking gives you effectively one free ball in your hole, with little danger of selling out if you bobble it, since the one goes up past the side pocket.
I've also played 1P only using the side pockets
I did try this quite a while back.
As CreeDo mentions, there is nothing in the rules that the rack should be broken with a soft or a hard break. I tried both.
I don't remember if it has to be played in rotation or if you shoot at whatever is in front of your designated pocket but once I determined that there would be many questions, I left it alone and haven't played since.
Something new is always worth at least one try.
http://www.einstein-nine.com/e9/einstein_nine_rules_of_play_20090822.pdf
apparently it is a rotation game
Sorry about that PGH. As I mentioned it was quite a while ago when I tried it out.
But I do remember now that you've reminded me that it was a rotation game. Thank you for that lol.
It seems as one other flaw I came across was in that in normal one pocket, if you scratch, you owe a ball to the spot. This is where it gets a little tricky. Since this game is rotation, the lowest number ball that was made at the time or before the scratch, would have to spot.
All of us know that if a ball has to spot but there is already another ball on the spot (let's say the 9 ball actually came to rest on the spot)the ball that currently needs spotting is spotted directly behind and touching the first ball on the spot.
Adding to that, following the scratch, the cb must be placed behind the head string.
So basically what I came across is that sometimes it could be handy to go ahead and scratch and owe the lowest ball, and spot it. The two issues are that (a) you are left with a long shot even when there may only be that one ball and (b) whereas before but there is already a ball on the spot, this means that the new ball is going to be tied up with little possibility of actually making it and continuing to shoot.
I think this is what turned me off to the game.
It's actually a ball-in-hand game (not in the kitchen).
It's literally 9 ball, except with 4 of the pockets blocked off. I think they were looking for 9 ball with some some added difficulty to the run, and a little strategy. But it remains to be seen if you can fit the appealing parts of 1 pocket by just limiting the holes in 9 ball.
Einstein 9 was invented by our own Cuebuddy, with some help from another Azbr, fd_colorado. It's a great game!
Scott Lee
http://poolknowledge.com
Yeah, it can't be any worse than alabama backmonkey or whatever that other game is we played![]()
relieved it doesnt involve tiny cues or turnips! :smile: