Am I being disrespectful to my *opponent?
Because I ALWAYS rake the balls after i miss a ball.
*the ghost
Because I ALWAYS rake the balls after i miss a ball.
*the ghost
Last edited:
I actually think conceding shots/games is a form of sharking.
If I'm in-stroke or getting in-stroke, then I want to shoot all the balls to maintain my rhythm and stay in the zone. When someone wipes the balls off the table when I'm trying to shoot them in, I think it's very disrespectful.
There are no concessions in professional golf. You must putt out. I don't think pool should be any different.
There are any number of things than can go wrong with even the easiest of shots. A heart attack in mid-stroke, for instance. A jealous husband tapping you on the back, just as you shoot. A wife with four kids standing at the front dood of the pool room screaming, "I need money for food!" Shit like that. :smile:
I like concessions. They speed up the game and can also be used in a strategic way. You concede several shots in a row. Even concede a shot that is not a straight up gimme. Then when the other player is expecting it you make them shoot it. They may dog it because they were expecting you to give it to them.
Also, conceding certain shots early in a match may keep the other player from getting in stroke.
Concessions in tourney play vs after hours play are two completely different things. I agree that in tourney play you should not concede.
But I don't feel this way in gambling matches. I've heard the argument that "too many crazy things may happen so I WILL NEVER concede a nine ball, even if it's hanging in the jaws".
If this is your mindset then it seems that you are wishing that your opponent dogs a real easy shot or makes a fluke miscue. As your opponent, this mindset makes me think you are weak, fearful and nitty.
And I don't those are the signals you want to be sending to your opponent in a game that's 90% mental and 100% about confidence.
Just my opinion.
Yes, as mentioned, this is done at pool as well. It is considered a shark -- a way to distract your opponent and get him to play less well. It is one reason for the "no concessions" rule in some tournaments.... Early on in a golf match you start giving your opponent all his putts within 3 foot. Then when he has a 3 footer on the back 9 (generally a more important time in the match) he will assume it will be given but you say nothing. He hasn't putted anything within 3 foot all day plus you have messed with his mind by making him putt it out. I have seen this work on a number of occasions. ...
I don't think anything positive can come out of this; this kind of thinking is usually by people who think they are smarter than everyone else and no one can figure out what they are doing because they are so clever. Well I have some bad news for you Hungarian; you're not smarter than everybody else and people know what you are doing and on more than 1 occasion your opponent has recognized what you did (or more likely tried to do) and has thought of you as a poor sportsman and has said that to others as well.
And if you don't think that some of those people that you did (or tried this on) won't recognize it and try to "shark you back" the next time you play you are fooling yourself. People aren't as dumb and naive as you think they are especially not pool players. If you do this kind of thing you have a local reputation of being an A$$___e weather you know it or not. People that think this way (thinking people don't recognize what they are doing) are usually too dense to realize that they have a bad reputation as a sportsman. So you have a choice you can keep on thinking that you're really clever or you can stop this shark/counter shark stuff and just play pool straight up.
You would always be required to pocket the nine if playing me, I would not try to shark you, I would let you shark yourself.
And from your what I can tell about you from your mind set, I would probably implement the stay in your seat and no talking rule also.........
The nineball is the only ball that counts, and in a money match, I would make sure you earn it by shooting the money ball and making it.
Of course I want my opponent to dog easy shots, and hard shots. I'm being honest, I do not want them to win. I do not wish someone good luck at the beginning of a match either, because I'm not a hypocrite. I do not want them to have any luck at all, I want them to lose. And I am not going to patronize them. I will usually not say anything, and if they wish me good luck, I will tell them I do not believe in luck.
To be real honest, I would like to say at the beginning of that match that "I am going to beat you!" But I refrain... I do have some manners.
But thats my attitude for sure, and I also have in my mind set that I will let them make mistakes.
I play poker lots, and many times, the money made is when someone else makes a mistake and you capitalize on it....
It's no different in pool, why take away the chance for them to miss a ball? It could be the difference between winning or losing a game or set. It's just smart pool simple as that.
Yes, as mentioned, this is done at pool as well. It is considered a shark -- a way to distract your opponent and get him to play less well. It is one reason for the "no concessions" rule in some tournaments.
And from your what I can tell about you from your mind set, I would probably implement the stay in your seat and no talking rule also.........I highly doubt I could stomach playing with you.
Of course I want my opponent to dog easy shots, and hard shots. I'm being honest, I do not want them to win. I do not wish someone good luck at the beginning of a match either, because I'm not a hypocrite. I do not want them to have any luck at all, I want them to lose. And I am not going to patronize them. I will usually not say anything, and if they wish me good luck, I will tell them I do not believe in luck.Wow, when I play in local tourneys I do it for fun. Yeah, I want to win but not to the point where I want my tourney friends to dog it. I guess everyone has their own reason for playing. Apparently you do it to cut your opponents liver out.
I play poker lots, and many times, the money made is when someone else makes a mistake and you capitalize on it....Do you bluff? With your views on concessions would you not consider bluffing a shark move in poker?
It's no different in pool, why take away the chance for them to miss a ball? It could be the difference between winning or losing a game or set. It's just smart pool simple as that.Because hoping and wishing that your opponent flukes or dogs it is not the strategy of a gun fighter.
I posted this in the thread congratulating Earl for winning the Ginky 10-ball memorial. For those who didnt see it, it was a hill/hill match & with 4 simple balls to runout, Kiamco was playing great. He has to just sink the 9 in the side (which he is straight in on), then roll up for the 10 in the corner to send him into the finals. He sinks the 9, then in rolling up, follows the cue ball into the side pocket,scratching!
Interesting example of why you should make everyone shoot every shot. Before Kiamco scratched, I was thinking Earl should have conceded the game (even as early as when Kiamco had about 4 balls left and it looked like simple connect the dots). Even the pros can miss em'. Interesting question about showing respect to a skilled opponent vs. making every opponent shoot every shot.
Thoughts?
Steve
You guys are taking this way too personal and way too serious.
But don't call me a shark artist.
You concede several shots in a row. Even concede a shot that is not a straight up gimme. Then when the other player is expecting it you make them shoot it. They may dog it because they were expecting you to give it to them.
I can concede any shot I want to in a gambling match. It's none of your business. It's been part of the game for a long time before I ever played and will continue as long as people gamble at pool.
It's a very mild mind game but it's not a shark move.
Remember, when you are gambling you are trying to beat your opponent out of his money. You are not trying to win a trophy.
On the other hand, if I'm betting $500 my only goal is to transfer my opponents money into my pocket.
To win I must play better then my opponent
and I must maintain my confidence and mental edge. If conceding a few strategic balls makes me feel clever and confident I'm going to do it.
This is not a moral issue unless you consider gambling a moral issue..
and that's why these statements of yours make me uncomfortable.
It makes me feel uncomfortable that in 3 months you have accumulated 450 blabbering posts.
I don't consider this sharking at all and think its purly strategic.If your opponent had a issue with it and askedI like concessions. They speed up the game and can also be used in a strategic way. You concede several shots in a row. Even concede a shot that is not a straight up gimme. Then when the other player is expecting it you make them shoot it. They may dog it because they were expecting you to give it to them.
Also, conceding certain shots early in a match may keep the other player from getting in stroke.
Really is that the best you can answer post #450? Really? My goodness how childish are you? Resorting to digs not relevant to the discussion? Really?
Hungarian said:I like concessions. They speed up the game and can also be used in a strategic way. You concede several shots in a row. Even concede a shot that is not a straight up gimme. Then when the other player is expecting it you make them shoot it. They may dog it because they were expecting you to give it to them.
Also, conceding certain shots early in a match may keep the other player from getting in stroke.
I don't consider this sharking at all and think its purly strategic.
I don't consider this sharking at all and think its purly strategic.