Aiming Systems - The End Justifies the Means

Status
Not open for further replies.
There are lots of different ways to accomplish the same thing.

Learning how to "jack up" or elevate your cue and draw your cue ball is a basic fundamental that you had better know how to do and do well or you will be left sitting in your chair.

All of these "interesting" (and valuable) techniques have merit and an accomplished player will know how and be able to execute all of the techniques and nuances of each method.

In recent months I have been teaching myself how to draw the cue ball when it is against the rail and elevating the cue is the only way to do draw the cue ball.

There's nothing wrong with using a level cue for draw but it is rare when a truly level cue is used for draw.

The attempt to have your cue as level as possible is often, a good thing, but not always, because most times, a truly level cue just isn't possible and sometimes something else is needed.
Good points Joey. In fact, a "level cue" is not possible with most pool shots. The cue is always elevated some to clear the rails, especially when the CB is closer to the rail, and even more so with draw shots. That's one reason why follow shots can be more accurate than draw shots, in general (see follow shot accuracy for more info).

Obviously, the cue must be elevated to create draw with the CB close to the rail. The key is to not elevate the cue more than is necessary for a particular shot.

Regards,
Dave
 
my opinion is a pro level player has such a high control and understanding over his stroke, cue ball, table and shot that they can do magical things on a pool table.
Pros can do remarkable things that those who haven't devoted their lives to the game can't - but "magic" is a substitute for understanding, not a result of it.

pj <- buzz kill
chgo
 
JB Cases;3793892... sometimes a pro is doing their best to explain a method or technique that they have found works great and even though one can dispute the physics of it one can't dispute the results. ...[/QUOTE said:
True. But that should not preclude us from trying to understand exactly what is going on. If something is not explained clearly and accurately, other people trying to learn what the speaker/writer is trying to convey may well have a more difficult time learning.
 
my opinion is a pro level player has such a high control and understanding over his stroke, cue ball, table and shot that they can do magical things on a pool table.

It's often only when the magic is understood that someone else can duplicate the trick.
 
As a coach who will teach pitchers to throw curves, you'll have to be able to communicate to different players in different ways. Can you do that effectively without knowing how curves really work?

I think maybe you're getting hung up on the word "physics". We're talking about pool, not quantum mechanics. Try thinking of it in more common terms, like "how things work".

pj
chgo

PJ,

I know the physics of the curve ball. (2 yrs. high school & 2 college semesters)

I would teach the physics to a pitcher that might need that information. The point I apparently am failing to make is that the performer does not need to know that info if he (or she) is executing properly. (silence can be golden)

'Here's how you throw a curve ball' & 'here is the physics as to why it curves' are NOT the same thing.

I also know pitching coaches that have no idea of the physics behind the curve ball but they are very adept at teaching how to throw it.

I think we can put this ball back in the ball bag, as I understand your quest for the truth. I too want the truth, the whole truth &.... but, I am a bit more willing to 'believe' in 'things' other than physics where human beings are concerned.

Motivation can be a powerful 'force'. See my Rider Cup reference in an earlier post.

No one can realistically 'argue' with you & the physics. What they can take exception with is the unwillingness to consider things outside the realm of the physical physics.

Just trying to be helpful IF I can.
Best Wishes,
Rick
 
Last edited:
PJ,

I know the physics of the curve ball. (2 yrs. high school & 2 college semesters)

I would teach the physics to a pitcher that might need that information. The point I apparently am failing to make is that the performer does not need to know that info if he (or she) is executing properly. (silence can be golden)

'Here's how you throw a curve ball' & 'here is the physics as to why it curves' are NOT the same thing.

I also know pitching coaches that have no idea of the physics behind the curve ball but they are very adept at teaching how to throw it.

I think we can put this ball back in the ball bag, as I understand your quest for the truth. I too want the truth, the whole truth &.... but, I am a bit more willing to 'believe' in 'things' other than physics where human beings are concerned.

Motivation can be a powerful 'force'. See my Rider Cup reference in an earlier post.

No one can realistically 'argue' with you & the physics. What they can take exception with is the unwillingness to consider things outside the realm of the physical physics.

Just trying to be helpful IF I can.
Best Wishes,
Rick

No Rush;) they provide comfort
Training+Wheels.png
 
The point I apparently am failing to make is that the performer does not need to know that info if he (or she) is executing properly. (silence can be golden)
We aren't talking about confusing players who already successfully use the technique. We're talking about teaching readers of AzB who don't know any better a technique that doesn't do what's claimed and, more importantly, might confuse them about how things really work and sidetrack their progress in other ways.

I get your point - it just doesn't apply.

No one can realistically 'argue' with you & the physics. What they can take exception with is the unwillingness to consider things outside the realm of the physical physics.
Developing players should know the facts about how things work in pool before "considering things outside the realm of physical physics". I'm sorry if you take exception with that.

pj
chgo
 
Last edited:
Why not just stick with pool?

If a player believes that they get great draw action because they elevate the butt of their cue do you think they could benefit from knowing that the cue elevation isn't necessary to draw the cue ball? I think a player like this could really benefit from a true understanding of how draw works.

Using your line of thinking, you wouldn't want to let this player know that they really don't need to elevate their cue in such a manner because they may lose their ability to draw the cue ball. So, now they continue shooting with a jacked up cue. Could this technique work for them in the long run - I suppose it's possible but why would anybody want to incorporate this into their game if it's not necessary?

Later on, this same player starts believing that the only way to put english on the ball is by swiping at it, so they then incorporate a swiping technique into their game. For some reason or another, they also love to jump up on each and every shot because they've always done it like that and it never slowed them down any. I could go on and on with examples like this. All you need to do is go to a busy league night just about anywhere in the U.S., and you could see guys and gals incorporating all kinds of "interesting" techniques in their games.

Us pool players have a tendency to build layer upon layer upon layer of worthless and sometimes contradictory techniques. It can be quite comical to watch at times. I include myself in this.

My point is, a lot of stuff pool players believe is crap. I read somewhere recently, it may have even been here on AZ but I don't recall, anyway, someone was quoting their beloved grandmother, who told them "Don't be so open minded that your brains fall out."

P.S. I have enjoyed many of your posts RJ. Keep them coming.

BD,

I'm glad you enjoyed some of my 'stuff'.

It's all relative: beginner, novice, intermediate, AA, Pro, or World Champion.

If the World Champion is doing the things you outlined & he or she has been doing them their entire career & those are their perceptions, then he or she should probably not be introduced to anything that someone else judges to be easier or more effective. At least not until they are having problems with something.

If a beginner, etc. is attempting methods that are not conducive to success then by all means a more fuctional option should be offered & introduced.

CJ, I believe, prefers to play with a bit of an elevated cue. Would you tell him that it is not necessary & he would probably be better served to play with a more level cue. Mike Seigel has a fairly severe elbow dorp would you tell him he should refrain from doing so, if he intends to continue to compete.

Would you tell Babe Ruth that he hit all of his home runs swinging inappropriately because it was different than the norm of his time.

Do you allow one to obtain individual greatness or do you teach them to be mediocre.

Sorry,
I've seen very good ball players ruined by prescribed 'teachings'. Human beings are not robots. Each one is an individual all to one's self.

Attempting to assist them is an endeavor of risk & reward. It is a huge responsibily. Like a Doctor, the creed should be, 'do no harm'.

There are probably 20 or more different levels of players on AZB. I doubt there is any universal advice applicable to all.

In golf, there is almost never a change of one thing that has a desired affect. Usually it is a combination of at leat two(2). So, to say do this without that can at times cause a worse problem than the one to which the 'fix' was intended to cure.

Just my $0.50 rant,
Rick
 
Not disagreeing with you Neil. I have learned a lot from Dave's videos. The point I want to make though is that sometimes a pro is doing their best to explain a method or technique that they have found works great and even though one can dispute the physics of it one can't dispute the results.

I am just in the camp that firmly believes that pros have insight that we amateurs don't have. Not magic knowledge but instead simply a far greater range of experience than most of us amateurs have. So why should we tear these guys apart when they try to help us?

Should I argue with Buddy Hall or Jose Parica about how to hit a ball? I don't think so unless I was at their level. I have been fortunate enough to spend time with Rafael Martinez, Jose Parica, Danny Medina, Rodney Morris, and other pros and I can tell you that to a man they have all showed me things that aren't found in books. Things that aren't found in Dr. Dave's material. Does that invalidate those methods? Not to me it doesn't.

And frankly, I'd bet on the pros against just about everyone here in both shotmaking contests, run out contests, and position play contests. If they haven't figured out the easy way to do these things then no one can. :-)

Tap! Tap! Tap!
 
There are lots of different ways to accomplish the same thing.

Learning how to "jack up" or elevate your cue and draw your cue ball is a basic fundamental that you had better know how to do and do well or you will be left sitting in your chair.

All of these "interesting" (and valuable) techniques have merit and an accomplished player will know how and be able to execute all of the techniques and nuances of each method.

In recent months I have been teaching myself how to draw the cue ball when it is against the rail and elevating the cue is the only way to do draw the cue ball.

There's nothing wrong with using a level cue for draw but it is rare when a truly level cue is used for draw.

The attempt to have your cue as level as possible is often, a good thing, but not always, because most times, a truly level cue just isn't possible and sometimes something else is needed.

Tap! Tap! Tap!
 
my opinion is a pro level player has such a high control and understanding over his stroke, cue ball, table and shot that they can do magical things on a pool table.

Mike,

Definiton #2 of magical: mysteriously enchanting

I say Pros are mysteriously enchanting in their uncanny employment of the seeming very diffucult physics of solid spheres coliding with other solid shperes & careeming off softer perimeter inhibitors (rails) whille initiating each action with a rather tiny piece of leather attached to the end of a wooden stick, all while maintaining one foot on the floor.

Your wording seems to be more 'hip' than mine.

RJ
 
We aren't talking about confusing players who already successfully use the technique. We're talking about teaching readers of AzB who don't know any better a technique that doesn't do what's claimed and, more importantly, might confuse them about how things really work and sidetrack their progress in other ways.

I get your point - it just doesn't apply.


Developing players should know the facts about how things work in pool before "considering things outside the realm of physical physics". I'm sorry if you take exception with that.

pj
chgo

PJ,

I do not take exception with that.

I'm glad you clarified the perameters. I did not know we we're only talking to readers of AZB who don't know any better.

I thought this conversation was more about CJ's perhaps not explaining the physics of a shot exactly correct. I did not realize that you proffered that CJ's technique does not work. I thought it was about his perception of the cause vs the actual physics as you relayed them.

I appologize. I thought it was more of a 'conversation' between more experienced & learned players of the game. I guess I got confussed some where along the line.

Again, my apologies.
Rick

PS My apologies to all AZB readers. Im sorry if I have contributed to any confussion to anyone on AZB that does not fully understand the principles involved.
 
Houdini

PJ,

I do not take exception with that.

I'm glad you clarified the perameters. I did not know we we're only talking to readers of AZB who don't know any better.

I thought this conversation was more about CJ's perhaps not explaining the physics of a shot exactly correct. I did not realize that you proffered that CJ's technique does not work. I thought it was about his perception of the cause vs the actual physics as you relayed them.

I appologize. I thought it was more of a 'conversation' between more experienced & learned players of the game. I guess I got confussed some where along the line.

Again, my apologies.
Rick

PS My apologies to all AZB readers. Im sorry if I have contributed to any confussion to anyone on AZB that does not fully understand the principles involved.

The Biggest Secrets Yet to be Revealed
 
PJ,

I do not take exception with that.

I'm glad you clarified the perameters. I did not know we we're only talking to readers of AZB who don't know any better.

I thought this conversation was more about CJ's perhaps not explaining the physics of a shot exactly correct. I did not realize that you proffered that CJ's technique does not work. I thought it was about his perception of the cause vs the actual physics as you relayed them.

I appologize. I thought it was more of a 'conversation' between more experienced & learned players of the game. I guess I got confussed some where along the line.

Again, my apologies.
Rick

PS My apologies to all AZB readers. Im sorry if I have contributed to any confussion to anyone on AZB that does not fully understand the principles involved.
No apologies needed, Rick. Of course we're talking to experienced players here, but I'm always mindful that there are many more readers than active posters here, especially when you consider these posts last awhile.

pj
chgo
 
I don't think the understanding of pool physics is required to play at a top speed. Outside of the very basics:

- tangent lines
- hitting high makes the cb follow
- hitting low makes the cb come back
- hitting to the side makes the cb squirt

Nothing else is needed/required to play top-flight pool. There are a few players I've met (not naming names because I'm not starting a fight) who couldn't tell you anything about physics in general, let alone how it applies to pool. In fact, if you ask them to spell physics they'd probably start with the letter "F."

If you go back to the turn of the century, I'd bet a lot more players were 100% "feel players" than those who truly understood the laws of physics and how they apply to our game (outside of the bullet points above).

I want to be clear--- I'm NOT saying the knowledge of physics is bad nor is it unhelpful. I'm merely saying if illiterate people can play super pool, it's not REQUIRED. The only way knowledge is BAD is if someone is so focused on the minutia that they can't clear their mind and execute. Pool is a good example of "less is more" when it comes to your conscious mind.
 
BD,

I'm glad you enjoyed some of my 'stuff'.

It's all relative: beginner, novice, intermediate, AA, Pro, or World Champion.

If the World Champion is doing the things you outlined & he or she has been doing them their entire career & those are their perceptions, then he or she should probably not be introduced to anything that someone else judges to be easier or more effective. At least not until they are having problems with something.

If a beginner, etc. is attempting methods that are not conducive to success then by all means a more fuctional option should be offered & introduced.

CJ, I believe, prefers to play with a bit of an elevated cue. Would you tell him that it is not necessary & he would probably be better served to play with a more level cue. Mike Seigel has a fairly severe elbow dorp would you tell him he should refrain from doing so, if he intends to continue to compete.

Would you tell Babe Ruth that he hit all of his home runs swinging inappropriately because it was different than the norm of his time.

Do you allow one to obtain individual greatness or do you teach them to be mediocre.

Sorry,
I've seen very good ball players ruined by prescribed 'teachings'. Human beings are not robots. Each one is an individual all to one's self.

Attempting to assist them is an endeavor of risk & reward. It is a huge responsibily. Like a Doctor, the creed should be, 'do no harm'.

There are probably 20 or more different levels of players on AZB. I doubt there is any universal advice applicable to all.

In golf, there is almost never a change of one thing that has a desired affect. Usually it is a combination of at leat two(2). So, to say do this without that can at times cause a worse problem than the one to which the 'fix' was intended to cure.

Just my $0.50 rant,
Rick

Total red herring post. You are assuming that someone is telling CJ not to do what he is doing. You couldn't be farther from the truth. What CJ does obviously works for him, and he shouldn't change it. That does NOT mean that it will work for a single person other than himself.

What a number of you are totally missing, is that some of these "secrets" are not actually secrets, but are idiosyncrasies to ONES individual game. Look at it this way- you are starting a new job. You haven't done this kind of work before. Now, they offer training to do it, or, you can go it on your own. Of course, you would be an idiot not to take the training. The training, as usual, consist of the requirements of the basics. How to achieve the desired results in the least amount of effort.

Now, does anyone expect you to be a master because you took some training? NO. But, with that training, you now know what basically to do, and why. With that training, you can now add little idiosyncrasies unique to you to make that training more efficient for YOU.

If someone with many years of experience on the job tells you on your first day to do some idiosyncrasy of his, it may or may not work for you. Odds are it won't work for you, because you aren't doing the underlying things that he is that make it work for him.

The only reason the wrist twist works for CJ is because he is doing something else different that the wrist twist makes up for, or counters. If YOU aren't doing that something else different the same way he is, twisting your wrist will only make you go off line, and you will have to figure out something else to correct for it. When and if you ever figure that out, then someday you can pass on your little secret also.

It's MUCH easier to learn why and how things react, what actually is going on, THEN come up with your own little idiosyncrasies to counter YOUR failure in being able to accomplish exactly what you want to do. We are human, not a single one of us can precisely duplicate a perfect stroke everytime. Just can't be done. However, with much practice, and a solid correct foundation, we can come up with what to us is a repeatable idiosyncrasy that does get the job done.

CJ thinks that these little secrets of his are what made him a phenomenal player. They are, but at the same time, they aren't. They are little idiosyncrasies that evolved for HIM. And, by his own testimony, took him a while while getting back into the game to figure out just what he had been doing before that he wasn't now.

He thinks the idiosyncrasies were the key, but he is missing what actually did make him and others great. It's not the "form", as much as it is the "mind". I have stated on here many times, that practice is to learn how to do something. Game time is when you apply what you have learned to do with the conscious mind, and use only the subconscious mind to perform.

What separates the elites from the rest of us? One thing- how the subconscious mind is used. For the vast majority of us, we cannot get the proper access to the subconscious mind that a few do naturally. The extreme of this would be your savants. They can see or hear something, and duplicate it almost flawlessly. Their minds are wired a little bit differently than the rest of us, and their subconscious plays a huge role in their savant ability. We all have that ability, but few ever learn how to tap into it, and fewer still to tap into it almost without effort on their part.

Recent studies have shown that savants, and those highly skilled in an endeavor utilize the subconscious mind much more than others do. Science has found a way to "jump start" the subconscious with proper electrical stimuli. Studies have shown that when one has proper training, they can perform a task better than without the training. No big surprise there. However, they still make a number of mistakes. However, when the subconscious is electrically stimulated for just 20 minutes, and then they are given the training, they then perform the required task almost without fail. AND, it sticks with them after the stimuli is removed!

In other words, science has now come up with a way to make us a savant in whatever endeavor we choose. You will see big changes happening in the not to distant future!

What this shows, is that our brains have the capacity to "figure things out". For a few of us, that will be a short journey. In pool, some only a few years.(those that naturally have better access to their subconsious) For most of us, it can be a lifetime of never achieving the same results, simply because we normally use a different part of our brain. However, with proper training in HOW things actually work, and copious amounts of time at the practice table, most of us can achieve a very high level of play compared to the "norm" of play level. Taking someones else's idiosyncrasies as our own may work, but odds are will not, and will only set one back. Much better to go with the basics of what is known to work, and come up with your own idiosyncrasies to make it easier for YOU to perform.

If you are one of the many that don't naturally use the full spectrum of your subconscious to play pool, then you are much better off learning how and why things work on a table, and going from there. It actually is the only other way to learn to play the game at a higher level. Without your subconscious playing a huge part, and without the knowledge, then you are just floundering around out in a sea of green felt with no wind at your back, and nothing to guide you. Which is exactly why there are so many mediocre players that have been playing for decades.

For those wondering, yes, there are ways to "stimulate" your subconscious without having to go through a form of electro-shock treatment. But, this is long enough for now. It's already long enough that probably half on here won't even bother to read it, but that is their loss.:wink:
 
Last edited:
I don't think the understanding of pool physics is required to play at a top speed. Outside of the very basics:

- tangent lines
- hitting high makes the cb follow
- hitting low makes the cb come back
- hitting to the side makes the cb squirt

Nothing else is needed/required to play top-flight pool. There are a few players I've met (not naming names because I'm not starting a fight) who couldn't tell you anything about physics in general, let alone how it applies to pool. In fact, if you ask them to spell physics they'd probably start with the letter "F."

If you go back to the turn of the century, I'd bet a lot more players were 100% "feel players" than those who truly understood the laws of physics and how they apply to our game (outside of the bullet points above).

I want to be clear--- I'm NOT saying the knowledge of physics is bad nor is it unhelpful. I'm merely saying if illiterate people can play super pool, it's not REQUIRED. The only way knowledge is BAD is if someone is so focused on the minutia that they can't clear their mind and execute. Pool is a good example of "less is more" when it comes to your conscious mind.

Tap! Tap! Tap!

Well said.

And... if the next World Champion comes from the ranks of the physics academics, tap, tap, tap, to them as well.

There is more than one way to skin a cat & I for one want to know them all. I don't care how heavy my tool box gets.

RJ
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top