... We're going to some how grow the sport by having all of our top pro's skip major events to play a BB. Pry not the smartest move. ...
But what IF BB became a real success -- something that actually put money in lots of pros pockets for the long term? Would that be bad?
What if BB became so successful that it just gobbled up all the current "major" events like Pac-Man? Would that be bad?
Well, yes it would be bad for a few promoters and for many fans who want to see lots of different pool games. But for pro pool, maybe it would be good. After all, do today's "major events" really provide a way for pros to earn a living? Sure, a few guys earn decent prize money in each event. But, as an example, which do you suppose is greater -- the total amount of prize money paid out in each year's U.S. Open 9-Ball event (forget the slow-pay aspect of it) or the total amount of money spent by the players on the event (entry fees plus expenses for travel, hotel, food, etc.)? I'm guessing it is a big negative each year for the entrants in aggregate (caveat -- many of them are amateurs who know they are "dead money" and are there for other reasons).
But BB raises the possibility of actually being a net positive to the players financially. Jobs! Regular income! Stability! Hosanna!
But maybe I'm getting a bit ahead of myself.:smile:
Last edited: