Oh come now, let's use our sense. If you roll the cueball with english there is little to no deflection. If you shoot hard, there is significantly more deflection. What good does it do you to find some imaginary line. Man, let's be realistic.
I think it's nice that's Bankers is bringing everyone together in solidarity. Maybe he's a mad genius.
P's thanks Pj and friends for always trying to provide truth(even if I occasionally disagree with the style)
I think it's nice that's Bankers is bringing everyone together in solidarity. Maybe he's a mad genius.
P's thanks Pj and friends for always trying to provide truth(even if I occasionally disagree with the style)
Of course, you can forego any and all aiming systems and use the HAMB approach. Another approach is to be ignorant or feign ignorance and argue with Neil. Some call that the "English" approach. With that approach, after 46 years of playing experience, you can consider yourself an instructor without any formal training or certification as long as you agree to be a CJ sycophant.
So if an aiming system guides me to the correct line for pocketing the ball, and I switch to a cue with a DIFFERENT amount of deflection, how can I expect the aiming system to work for both cues?
The bottom line is that I will need a different setup for each cue because they have different amounts of deflection. So how will any one aiming system cover both of them?
And not to mention the difference in deflection between a soft and a hard hit. How does your aiming system adjust for differences in deflection due to soft and hard hits?
You can shoot softly on one line and make the ball. But if you shoot hard on the same line, there will be more deflection, and the object ball path will be altered.
You will defy the logicians if you can solve this problem.
So if an aiming system guides me to the correct line for pocketing the ball, and I switch to a cue with a DIFFERENT amount of deflection, how can I expect the aiming system to work for both cues?
The bottom line is that I will need a different setup for each cue because they have different amounts of deflection. So how will any one aiming system cover both of them?
And not to mention the difference in deflection between a soft and a hard hit. How does your aiming system adjust for differences in deflection due to soft and hard hits?
You can shoot softly on one line and make the ball. But if you shoot hard on the same line, there will be more deflection, and the object ball path will be altered.
You will defy the logicians if you can solve this problem.
Chris,
Welcome to the area of the game called "feel." Im no aiming system guru but I'm an aiming method guy. There is a difference. Perhaps you expect too much from your aiming system. It just cant calculate squirt, curve and deflection as long as you.....play....that is something you have to do. No two cues play exactly alike some are close but it is what it is and you learn to cope with different deflecting allowances with each one. First you have to see the shot with Center Ball then you learn to make the allowance for your cue for English, thats just the way things work.
This is why Ive never been an aiming system person. Because I feel the protocol in an aiming system disconnects the player from being able to see the shot is on therefore they havent a clue on how to make an allowance for their cue.
I dont mean to start a flare up of aiming wars but what you posted is a great reason why there are differences between the cters and the naysayers in my humble opinion.
Good Luck finding your answer and your game, it can be an elusive search.
Just another lovely day in paradise.....
336Robin :thumbup:
aimisthegameinpool.com
aimisthegameinpool@yahoo.com
As an aiming system guy I can tell you without a doubt that after some practice you just see and know that the shots you are down on are ON.
Once in while you will come up on a shot that you have never shot before or which is tricky. This is where a system really shines because you can have a better than 50% chance to make the shot. I have made so many great shots like this over the past decade that I couldn't possibly count them.
It's really not that complicated. Learn to aim then apply spin. If the shooter has half a brain then you figure out within an hour what the cue is doing and will know what to do. If you can't get used to the cue then change cues.
So if an aiming system guides me to the correct line for pocketing the ball, and I switch to a cue with a DIFFERENT amount of deflection, how can I expect the aiming system to work for both cues?
The bottom line is that I will need a different setup for each cue because they have different amounts of deflection. So how will any one aiming system cover both of them?
And not to mention the difference in deflection between a soft and a hard hit. How does your aiming system adjust for differences in deflection due to soft and hard hits?
You can shoot softly on one line and make the ball. But if you shoot hard on the same line, there will be more deflection, and the object ball path will be altered.
You will defy the logicians if you can solve this problem.
JB,
I will admit for the very reason quoted above in your post I am curious about aiming systems but get lost in the several explanations of them so I just dont go there because I already see the how the shot is supposed to be hit.
For the record I am really glad that they work. It keeps people playing pool and as per your post it seems you understand what you are supposed to do in order to play English within your system method. Thats about all you need to be able to do with any of it up to a certain level and I fully agree with what you are saying.
As a purist who is dedicated to my methods I will say that what Im doing is really easy for me and tells me everything I need to know about the shot Im getting ready to attempt or decide not and shoot safe. Im sure some of you aiming system guys still miss a few or decide to go safe as well.
I believe there is a huge place in the middle between Naturally understanding what to do and understanding what to do based on aiming systems where the both can meet and assist each other but I have not a lot of time to devote to learning cte to find it, Im trying to get my mess together to retire in 23 months. Perhaps then I will take the time to learn it, right now Im working on my game. Stevie Moore is said to use cte and was a natural player before that so I think the evidence is there. My only concern is that where you guys have a pivoting protocol you do and I tend to do my alignments while standing Im concerned I might feel out of kilter...Ive a friend who has tried to explain this to me and done a really bad job and I just shake my head and say enough cause my head starts spinning and I feel like Im falling off the world and want my feet back on solid ground. I dont have any problem with it, its just different and my only hope is you guys understand how to play English with it because to be a great player you have to spin the ball.
Just another lovely day in paradise.....
336Robin :thumbup:
aimisthegameinpool.com
aimisthegameinpool@yahoo.com
This the middle ground I think that system users need to get to - which is doing it enough that it becomes a natural rhythm without conscious thought. And sometimes that does happen.
Here is the solution you are looking for..... A+BHE/(S+E+T)=F
Solved!!!
How about bridge length on different shafts?
All the same length and same results?
How about bridge length on different shafts?
All the same length and same results?[/QUOTE
Yep here is your forum-u-la for that. A=CCB+CTE~GBC+BHE/BL(D)-E
Works for every shaft to get the cue ball to pocket the ball and move to the desired position after contact.
So if an aiming system guides me to the correct line for pocketing the ball, and I switch to a cue with a DIFFERENT amount of deflection, how can I expect the aiming system to work for both cues?
The bottom line is that I will need a different setup for each cue because they have different amounts of deflection. So how will any one aiming system cover both of them?
And not to mention the difference in deflection between a soft and a hard hit. How does your aiming system adjust for differences in deflection due to soft and hard hits?
You can shoot softly on one line and make the ball. But if you shoot hard on the same line, there will be more deflection, and the object ball path will be altered.
You will defy the logicians if you can solve this problem.
So if an aiming system guides me to the correct line for pocketing the ball, and I switch to a cue with a DIFFERENT amount of deflection, how can I expect the aiming system to work for both cues?
The bottom line is that I will need a different setup for each cue because they have different amounts of deflection. So how will any one aiming system cover both of them?
And not to mention the difference in deflection between a soft and a hard hit. How does your aiming system adjust for differences in deflection due to soft and hard hits?
You can shoot softly on one line and make the ball. But if you shoot hard on the same line, there will be more deflection, and the object ball path will be altered.
You will defy the logicians if you can solve this problem.