I will say it once again for emphasis, Earl ran 5 or 6 racks in nearly EVERY match he played (Races to Eleven) back in the 80's and early 90's, when he was the dominant 9-Ball player. If he only ran a couple of 3's it was not one of his best matches. He did this in tournament after tournament for several years. I was the director of many of those tournaments, particularly the Sands in Reno, held twice a year. Earl's high gear then was a ball above the rest of the world!
I saw many a match where Earl might be down something like 6-2 or 7-3 and the next time his opponent came to the table they were trailing by a couple of games. He took the wind out of their sails, that's for sure. I'm not sure I ever saw him run a 9 but he was certainly capable. Remember this is the guy who ran 11 racks on a tough Gold Crown for a million dollars. And he did it on the first day it was offered!
A 5 or 6 rack run was par for the course for Earl back then, not considered anything unusual. He remains the best tournament 9-Ball player I ever saw. And this in an era of Sigel, Hall, Varner, Hopkins, Mizerak, Howard, Rempe etc. etc.
Jay, how was Earls gambling pool game, like i said on here before Strickland came To Baltimore in the 80s and played Tom Vanover on Vanovers table where Vanover worked, they only played 50 a game for over 20 hours and broke even, I know Vanover wasnt near the player that Strickland was but he did hang with him on his own table, so iam thinking that Earls gambling game wasnt his best game!