Jon...I watched the first rack,
and what I saw was what looks to me to be an accurate representation of a quality pendulum stroke, with little to no elbow drop.
A pendulum swings along the vertical axis & has no tilt to it & he does drop his elbow on occasion.
As far as the other comment...
I don't even know what "restricted" means.
That seems pretty sad coming from a Master Instructor & is an apparent dig at another Master Instructor that does know the meaning AND knows it when she sees it as does my untrained eye.
Looks to me like you get good action on the CB
with what you're doing.
That seems to imply that he could do something else to get better action on the ball. Would that maybe be to get his stroke un re-stricted?
Until I see you personally, I can't find any fault with what you're doing (sometimes we can "see" things in slow motion...sometimes even one frame at a time...that we can't see in real time)! No mention of reserving judgement until a better quality video, unless you make one IF & when you see him in person. Apparently you need slow mo & frame by frame to maybe see what Ms. Crimi & my 'untrained' eye saw in a rather poor quality video.
I'll be coming through CO right after the trade show in Chicago (7/8-10), if you're interested in getting together.
Scott Lee
http://poolknowledge.com
Sir, your ego & poor judgement will simply not allow you to leave well enough alone. Your post #177 was a not so good attempt to CYA. Your response to this will probably start off with, 'Not at all Rick'.
You choose to respond to my politely pointing out,
with qualifiers, to Jon, that you seemed to have missed a couple of things in your review of Jon's video. You can't leave it at that but must defend your 'reputation' by giving reasons as to why you said nothing about those seemingly obvious differences from what would & should be normal. I quess
you would rather have Jon grooving them until July when you might see him in person & if not he would continue to groove them, instead of simply bringing them to his attention as I & Ms. Crimi did & leave the choice up to him on what if anything he wants to do about them. No, instead you follow up with more coy & sly jabs at Ms. Crimi. The thing is that, what Jon is doing are
not flaws that have crept in or started out in his stroke. He is doing them consciously to emulate what some snooker players do, so as to improve his accuracy. We would not have found that out if we would have left them unmentioned.
I quess you consider certain AZB members your 'pesonal property' & how dare I or Ms. Crimi critique Jon's stroke, or anyone's to whom you have given a lesson, even though Jon posted the video in my thread, seemingly to me, for everyone to see.
Apparently you are very possesive of those to whom you have given a lesson & from this analysis, I would think that you should be.
You responded to my little comment pointing out that you may have missed something in your review. Yet... you have no follow up to my reply of your initial post regarding the main topic of this thread.
Why is that?
Did you really think that I would allow you to use me, my post, & my thread to take jabs at
an Instructor that I DO respect, namely Ms. Fran Crimi, with your coy & sly comments of negativity toward Ms. Crimi? Again you dsiplayed poor judgement.
I feel & think that you owe Ms. Crimi an apology for these comments & others that you've made in other threads, just as I felt that you owed Snapshot9 an apology when you basically called him a liar without using the word liar upon our first contact. You probably will not see it this way just as you did not regarding Snapshot. However I think
very many see through your veiled insults & dis-respect. I wish
you could actually see how it makes you look. In fact, I would certainly think that your comments especially when added all together would be a violation of some sort of code of ethics regarding the PBIA. But since you are on the board & such good friends with randyG you probably know that there would be no repercussions such as a suspension of your certification for conduct unbecoming or some such violation. So you probably think that you can get away with 'insults' of a fellew member & you probably can.
So, that not with standing, will you be man enough to make an apology?
PS Edit:
I was going to give you the benefit of doubt regarding an apology to Ms. Crimi but given the ego & poor judgement that you have displayed in the past I just wanted to add that I doubt that you will. You don't seem to understand the difference between 'being the bigger man' & just being 'a little man' & again I am not referring to your physical stature. I guess this
really kills us being 'friendly'.
You should apologize! But I seriosly doubt that you will. You will simply deny that anything was directed toward Ms. Crimi, but believe me, MOST of the general readership of AZB is not that naive & do not think that your evasions are good thing & would not pat you on the back for them. In my opinion, your egotistical personality WILL lose you clients in the long haul.