Okay, I will admit that perhaps I overstated a bit by saying, 'if not everyone'.
But the point of the 'discussion' is not for a side to side comparison as your proposition suggests. The discussion is in regards to the vertical direction because in a true complete pendulum the cue is 'rocking' with the butt going up, down, & up while the tip arcs down, up, & back down.
My point was that one does not have to watch the cue move to make a piston like stroke as Sean was suggesting & that almost anyone can make their piston like stroke with their eyes closed.
So no bet on that. One can have a 'hook' flaw in their 'pendulum' stroke & one can have a 'hook' flaw in their piston stroke.
But why all of the diversion. Just explain in no uncertain terms how the cue moves straight for several inches with no up or down movement in a fixed elbow stroke.
Do that & this 'discussion' is ended & as I have stated several times my opinion of a fixed elbow stroke will probably be changed for the better.
So here is my counter. Let me see a super slow motion of you doing a complete fixed elbow stroke where the elbow does not move & the cue tip moves straight with no up or down arcing for several inches. Then if you would be so kind please explain what bio-mechanics allowed you to accomplish it.
Best Wishes,
Rick
HisBoyElroy, and any others that think that Rick is reasonable, being unfairly picked on, ect...... please read the quote above. Notice that Rick makes a statement in a previous post, gets called on it, backpedals about it while admitting he was wrong, then makes the same statement again!
Then, notice the part in red. Rick has been saying this since he got on here. When he first got here, Scott Lee corrected some advice that Rick gave to someone that was wrong. Rick took umbrage to it, as he always does, and twisted what Scott said and condemned him for it in no uncertain terms. Naturally, Scott wasn't going to debate with him, and wrote him off as just another guy that thinks he knows what he is doing, doesn't, and doesn't care about knowing the right way about something.
Since then, Rick has been on a vendetta to go against every instructor on here with the exception of Fran (who one time gave Rick a compliment, and since he gets so few in life, he sided right up with her and anything she says, friends for life from one so-so compliment) and CJ (same thing as Fran. Rick even swears by TOI even though he can't get it to work for him to save his life)
The entire point of him starting this poll in the first place was soley to hopefully give him some ammo by pointing out that less people use the pendulum stroke, so it shows that instructors teach bad info. He even stated that very fact in this thread. When I called him on it, he then twisted the results of the actual poll to suit his needs, saying that using a pendulum variation doesn't count as a pendulum stroke at all.
Now, look at the part of his quote that is in red. I have provided the info he has asked for. (not the first time by me or others on here by a long shot). He claims to also want the "bio-mechanics" of it. That, as he openly admitted, I and others have provided in the past to him.
So, with the info he asked, I am asking him to stand by his word and stop posting about it. He now has his required proof. He has nothing to stand on anymore, his questions have been answered once again. Now, since he hasn't stopped on this subject, you tell me where the "reasonableness" is in his postings??