3.2 metres equals about 10.5 feet, which is not enough for any size table.The room is about 3.2 metres wide and it's a lot more in depth(Not worried about the depth, it's about 8 metres).
Would I be able to fit a 9 ft table in this room and be able to play on it without bumping into walls?
Would I have to place it diagonally?
The room is about 3.2 metres wide
The room is about 3.2 metres wide and it's a lot more in depth(Not worried about the depth, it's about 8 metres).
Would I be able to fit a 9 ft table in this room and be able to play on it without bumping into walls?
Would I have to place it diagonally?
The room is about 3.2 metres wide and it's a lot more in depth(Not worried about the depth, it's about 8 metres).
Would I be able to fit a 9 ft table in this room and be able to play on it without bumping into walls?
Would I have to place it diagonally?
You could fit it in there okay, but you'd only be able to sit there and look at it.![]()
It would fit perfectly for the activities for which most home pool tables are known...
The room is about 3.2 metres wide and it's a lot more in depth(Not worried about the depth, it's about 8 metres).
Would I be able to fit a 9 ft table in this room and be able to play on it without bumping into walls?
... .brunswickbilliards com helpful_information/ room_size_requirements.html ...
A friend of mine did more or less exactly that. He got a full-sized carom table and put it against the walls of his dining room. (No need for a ball return:thumbup... Get a table with a ball return and push it against the wall, at least you can use it for practice!
The room is about 3.2 metres wide and it's a lot more in depth(Not worried about the depth, it's about 8 metres).
Would I be able to fit a 9 ft table in this room and be able to play on it without bumping into walls?
Would I have to place it diagonally?