This speaks to the much-larger problem of how Brits perceive themselves in the world.
Others seem to be similarly afflicted.
Hyperlinking was not invented by Tim Berners-Lee, Ted Nelson likely deserves that credit.
Dave
Last edited:
This speaks to the much-larger problem of how Brits perceive themselves in the world.
This speaks to the much-larger problem of how Brits perceive themselves in the world. So I guess your technique backfired, Tim, because we now see there are many more of your "superiority complex" type over there, than just plain ol' Tim.![]()
Unfortunately, that's going to go in one ear and out the other, because Tim "saw" what he wanted to see
I mean, it's Exhibit A that he went back and revisited this old thread topic
because he just can't accept the fact he was proven so utterly wrong.
He so desperately wanted to hear that a Brit had something to do with "inventing the Internet"
Tim *knows* that I.T. is my day-job gig, and at one time I worked for one of the founding companies on the Internet before consumers even knew what the Internet was.
So it behooves me to know what I'm talking about, especially since I was there when the components were being assembled.
But alas, that doesn't matter, because in his mind -- "the BBC" (yeah, now that's an authoritative source for information technology if I ever saw one) said that a "Brit invented the Internet" -- and that's all he wants to hear.
The funny thing about that ostrich who sticks his head into the sand, is how tiny his head is in proportion to that massive body.
...
differences between the internet and the world wide web, I'd expect several sharp blows to the head. I'd probably inflict some myself. That you take pride in knowing such nonsense is very telling.
Based on your comments you are not a computer communications specialist.
No it's not. My ability to care about such geekery is strained to the max. Should I go into the pool hall and boast proudly about the differences between the internet and the world wide web, I'd expect several sharp blows to the head. I'd probably inflict some myself. That you take pride in knowing such nonsense is very telling.
What is a good thing to know and boast about then?
Proper techniques for tipping a hooker?
How much HP each model of the Rolls Phantom had?
What type of nails should be used in building a shed?
It's people that know that provide the ability for people that don't know to survive and have happy ignorant lives. Just funnel money into them and munch away in ignorance. I think the Time Machine had a good, although extreme, portrait of the differences between those that know things, the ones that did not were raised as food, although they were quite happy in being fed without caring about the how or why.
Boasting of one's ignorance, is, well, ignorant.
I did not know this was a dead/old thread. This thread was referenced in another thread. I did not notice the dates.
I was not in fact a member when this thread was started - I'm surprised you did not know that.
My point stands
What?![]()
All it "tells" is that one has an understanding of the technical history of "the Internet", which is somewhat handy (but not essential) when one is a computer communications specialist ... and the knowledge is certainly not nonsense. Based on your comments you are not a computer communications specialist.
Dave <-- computer communications specialist for the last 33 years, nerd for longer than that, engineer-but-can't-drive-a-train, and sometimes pool player
You are obsessed with the British, Sean. It is not surprising, but you should get over it.
No, I saw what was written. I'm good like that.
No, someone else bumped it.
Lol. I merely repeated something I was told. It was also something I really don't care about. But, to humour you, it appears from other posts the jury is out on who invented what.
No. Again, really couldn't care less either way.
No. I had no idea you provided secretarial services for "one of the founding companies on the internet". Your career 'highlights' really don't interest me.
No it doesn't. It certainly doesn't behoove you to tell us about it, not least because nobody cares. It really comes to something when pool players boast about how nerdy they are.
No it's not. My ability to care about such geekery is strained to the max. Should I go into the pool hall and boast proudly about the differences between the internet and the world wide web, I'd expect several sharp blows to the head. I'd probably inflict some myself. That you take pride in knowing such nonsense is very telling.
Yes, like those that don't know the difference between zero racks and ten racks? That sort of ostrich that sticks his head in the sand, Sean?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ve5ykKi0Ls
Others seem to be similarly afflicted.
Hyperlinking was not invented by Tim Berners-Lee, Ted Nelson likely deserves that credit.
Dave
That's right. Even though Tim Berners-Lee gets the nod for the whole topic of "hyperlinking" (a root concept of the world wide web), Tim didn't invent it -- it already existed, and guys like Ted Nelson and Douglas Engelbart get the nod for that.
So go fix your post #108 :wink:
Dave <-- was playing with HyperCard before the WWW existed
<edit:
PS Please know I think Sean "knows his stuff" in the area of computer networking, and likely knows much more than myself in many areas, not that I am that technically strong, just old. To most non-geeks T.B-E did invent hyper* by making it so accessible over an existing infrastructure built to a huge extent by US comp-sic academics and the US computer industry. I am mostly poking fun due to the overall circumstances surrounding this little skirmish ... always the chit disturber
PPS Also done with this thread within a thread just in case this old thread can be salvaged before being tossed to those fools in NPR />
Does the world of pool need the USA? What does the US offer the rest of the world?
Players? Nope.
Tournaments? Nope.
Technique? (stop laughing at the back) Nope.
TV coverage? Nope.
Innovation? I don't think so, but am happy to be corrected.
I see the US as existing in its own Darwinian bubble, with your game evolving in a different direction to the rest of the world. I see it as pining for a lost age, and not embracing a potentially golden tomorrow. I see it protecting its past, not chasing its future. Sentimental nostalgia is hardwired throughout these forums.
Snooker is in rude health. It saturated its traditional market and has sought new ones around the globe. The anti China sentiment I see a lot on this forum is crazy - there's 1.5 BILLION people in that market and you're pulling up the drawbridge and restocking the moat? It doesn't make any sense to me.
Quality products from Predator and Kamui get bashed here all the time, yet American made products of dubious worth are lauded and prized. There is no end to the cost of a product if we TRULY believe it will help us. Protectionism is rife. The lines between what's in the best interest of the sport and the best interests of business are blurred.
Above all, there seems to be no strategic plan or even thinking. All I see is further slow descent - and that's in nobody's best interest.
But hey, Jameson shots, Jameson. First round is on me!
Hey Thaiger, I'm still waiting for you to get your limey butt over here to see how well you'll do playing in the colonies. Los Angeles is not quite as congested as London but we certainly have the market cornered on freaky people and oddities.
Come to LA. I'll buy you some Fish and Chips or an American thing we have called tacos and take you on a tour of some real poolhalls. There is a definite pool culture here. It's hard to understand us until you see it first hand. Lots of good players, lots of interesting gambling. Lots of history.
By the way, I forgot where you live but in August we're going to Edinburgh, then Scottish highlands (Inverness), Glasgow, then to Ireland.
So go fix your post #108 :wink:
Dave <-- was playing with HyperCard before the WWW existed
<edit:
PS Please know I think Sean "knows his stuff" in the area of computer networking, and likely knows much more than myself in many areas, not that I am that technically strong, just old. To most non-geeks T.B-E did invent hyper* by making it so accessible over an existing infrastructure built to a huge extent by US comp-sic academics and the US computer industry. I am mostly poking fun due to the overall circumstances surrounding this little skirmish ... always the chit disturber
PPS Also done with this thread within a thread just in case this old thread can be salvaged before being tossed to those fools in NPR />