Congratulations Shane-world pool masters champ

In 1994 there were 2 different events called World Championship.

And Earl won one of them.

In 2007, there were 2 different events called World Championship.

Did Shane win either of those?

So, I guess if we are saying that Shane won zero, we are also saying that Earl only won 4. If we say Earl won 5, then that logic should apply to Shane in 2007.

So if Earl won 5, then any random person has won 1?

You've lost the thread, friend.
 
As soon as you mention Shane's name, some of these people go into liberal logic mode, where it doesn't matter what argument you make, Shane isn't the "insert whatever here". Whether it's a world champion, a legitimate world title holder, the best in the world..etc...

Then when they come up with crazy convoluted logic to make their argument and you point that out, you're a Shane nuthugger and YOU'RE the crazy one that goes insane when Shane is brought up, when it's only a reaction to them making their crazy denials.

I mean it is liberal logic 101...Makes no sense but they will cling to it forever...

Just wait until he wins a world championship sanctioned by the WPA, the stuff they will come up with will be laughable.

It will be something to the effect of "The WPA changed membership and that's why Shane won". It will literally be something THAT stupid...

Jaden

Just what are you babbling about. Is this you talking or the meds?

Anyway, I fully expect Shane to win a world championship. The question being debated is whether he is, already, a world champion.
 
Boy, this is getting dumb. Shane hasn't won a world championship, so people want to change what "world championship" means so that by the new definition he won one. Shane is a great player, this stupidity by some of his fans is not worthy of him.

The world championship is the world championship. Period. It's also the toughest event of the year. It's really the only event with all the best players from all over the world. The US Open is great. Derby city is great. I'm sure there are a lot of tournaments in the Philippines and Taiwan that are great and have really tough fields too. But none of those are the world championship.

How about just waiting until he wins an actual world championship before saying he's a world champion? Chances are, one of these years he's gonna get one. I don't get it. Are the Shane fans secretly worried that he doesn't have what it takes to bring home the big one, so they have to make excuses?
 
This is needlessly complicated. If/when Shane wins a truly world-class event, with dozens of players from Taiwan/Philippines in addition to the usual Euro/American competitors, he'll be considered a world champion. Regardless of the actual, technical title.

For example: the All Japan Championship being held right now.

the All-Japan Open has a winner's break, rack-your-own format which is really favorable for SVB.
:clapping: GO GO GO SHANE VAN BOENING!!! :clapping:
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure what all the fuss is about regarding whether or not SVB or Niels or Dennis O or whomever else are "world champions". This is pool and pool as an organization is, well ,pitiful. Not the bca nor the WPA mean much because, unfortunately every single field assembled fails to collect all the worlds best players under one roof. Until that happens, all of this discussion is merely pissing in the wind.
 
As soon as you mention Shane's name, some of these people go into liberal logic mode, where it doesn't matter what argument you make, Shane isn't the "insert whatever here". Whether it's a world champion, a legitimate world title holder, the best in the world..etc...

Then when they come up with crazy convoluted logic to make their argument and you point that out, you're a Shane nuthugger and YOU'RE the crazy one that goes insane when Shane is brought up, when it's only a reaction to them making their crazy denials.

I mean it is liberal logic 101...Makes no sense but they will cling to it forever...

Just wait until he wins a world championship sanctioned by the WPA, the stuff they will come up with will be laughable.

It will be something to the effect of "The WPA changed membership and that's why Shane won". It will literally be something THAT stupid...

aare you shaane in disguise?

ok he isn't a world champion we have clarified that multiple times but I would like to address the next point

when shane wins the world championship why would he then be the best player ever? he needs to win 5 to compete with earl and a bunch more to be level with efren varner orcullo, Appleton etc he wins 1? wow for the player the nuthuggers portray him as is a disgrace.

not to forget what is shanes best game? well its 10 ball because the break and he hasn't won that, he says it is 8 baall he hasn't won that either, 9 ball is a crap shoot at this level apparently so if its a race to 100 with no pee breaks and all the dollar bills of side action played on TAR then he might win it

geez people think there defending shane and not his fault but they are fueling the fire against him with their idiocy ..........
 
And Earl won one of them.



Did Shane win either of those?



So if Earl won 5, then any random person has won 1?

You've lost the thread, friend.
buddha162, that is the contention here ... Shane won an event in 2007 called the World 10-ball Championship but it was not sanctioned by the WPA.
 
no one's trying to change anything...

Boy, this is getting dumb. Shane hasn't won a world championship, so people want to change what "world championship" means so that by the new definition he won one. Shane is a great player, this stupidity by some of his fans is not worthy of him.

The world championship is the world championship. Period. It's also the toughest event of the year. It's really the only event with all the best players from all over the world. The US Open is great. Derby city is great. I'm sure there are a lot of tournaments in the Philippines and Taiwan that are great and have really tough fields too. But none of those are the world championship.

How about just waiting until he wins an actual world championship before saying he's a world champion? Chances are, one of these years he's gonna get one. I don't get it. Are the Shane fans secretly worried that he doesn't have what it takes to bring home the big one, so they have to make excuses?

The only thing that's being brought up is WHAT is the definition of a world championship.

Shane HAS won an event put on as a world event with a world class field of players and as pitiful as it is a world class payout.

Since past acknowledged world champions have won tournaments that were called world championships that were NOT sanctioned by the WPA, the question arises what is different about the world championship that Shane won from those events???

The answer is that there is no difference except that people don't want to acknowledge them because Shane won it.

If you acknowledge Earl as a five time world champion, then you have to acknowledge Shane as a 1 time world Champion or you are a hypocrite. That is what was being brought up.

Even that isn't the REAL question though.

Any time someone brings up the opinion that Shane is the best in the world, the SAME people have come up with some excuse as to why he isn't. Oh they try to mask it by saying he's ONE of the best or that they HOPE he becomes the best, but that's all obfuscation and bullshit.

First it's, "well he hasn't proved himself over a several year period", then when he does that, "he only wins in the US and isn't a World Champion yet", then when he wins an international title with world in the name, "oh well he still isn't a world champion because he hasn't won a world championship", then when it's pointed out that he DID win a world championship in 2007, it's "but that wasn't sanctioned by the WPA", then when it's pointed out that other world championships have been acknowledged as such when they weren't sanctioned by the WPA, it's "What were we talking about"...

It's always some excuse to knock Shane down and it gets tired and it's pretty transparent to anyone with half a brain what's going on.

I wasn't that way when Efren was the best in the world, although I DO know people that were and would deny his being the best based on whatever you want to call it, National pride, Racism, whatever. I didn't abide that attitude closed lipped when it was my fellow countrymen doing it and I don't abide it when it's other people doing it...

Jaden
 
Last edited:
Earl: 4 or 5, makes little difference to me.

Shane: 0.

Just what are we arguing about here?

Earl is 22 yrs older for starters so he has competed in way more events. Shane is only 1 win away from 5 US Open wins which would tie Earls long standing record, but has only competed in a few of them, where Earl has been playing in the US Open since the early 80s. Earl has also competed in way more world events than Shane. Those are the only two arguments I can think of.
 
The only thing that's being brought up is WHAT is the definition of a world championship.

Shane HAS won an event put on as a world event with a world class field of players and as pitiful as it is a world class payout.

Since past acknowledged world champions have won tournaments that were called world championships that were NOT sanctioned by the WPA, the question arises what is different about the world championship that Shane won from those events???

The answer is that there is no difference except that people don't want to acknowledge them because Shane won it.

If you acknowledge Earl as a five time world champion, then you have to acknowledge Shane as a 1 time world Champion or you are a hypocrite. That is what was being brought up.

Even that isn't the REAL question though.

Any time someone brings up the opinion that Shane is the best in the world, the SAME people have come up with some excuse as to why he isn't. Oh they try to mask it by saying he's ONE of the best or that they HOPE he becomes the best, but that's all obfuscation and bullshit.

First it's well he hasn't proved himself over a several year period, then when he does that, he only wins in the US and isn't a World Champion yet, then when he wins an international title with world in the name, oh well he still isn't a world champion because he hasn't won a world championship, then when it's pointed out that he DID win a world championship in 2007, it's but that wasn't sanctioned by the WPA, then when it's pointed out that other world championships have been acknowledged as such when they weren't sanctioned by the WPA, it's "What were we talking about"...

It's always some excuse to knock Shane down and it gets tired and it's pretty transparent to anyone with half a brain what's going on.

I wasn't that way when Efren was the best in the world, although I DO know people that were and would deny his being the best based on whatever you want to call it, National pride, Racism, whatever. I didn't abide that attitude closed lipped when it was my fellow countrymen doing it and I don't abide it when it's other people doing it...

Jaden

A world championship is a world championship. Everyone knows what this means. It's a WPA-sanctioned world championship. Which also happens to be the toughest event with the toughest field in the world. When Kevin Trudeau had Mike Sigel play Loree Jon Jones for the "World 8-ball Championship", that was a joke. Everyone knew it. Just because someone calls something "world championship" doesn't make it so.

Do you think it helps Shane's reputation for people to try to weasel him into a world championship through some phony technicality? Of course not. It just makes his fans look like idiots. He's a great player, world class, but hasn't yet won a world championship. He probably will. Just be patient.

Is he the best in the world? Maybe. In my opinion, the best player in the world is the top guy in Taiwan, but I don't know enough about Taiwanese pool to say who is number one. Ko? The other Ko? Chang? The other Chang? Someone else I've never heard of? Even among guys that play regularly in the US, I'd say Shane, Appleton, and Orcollo are a toss-up for number 1. But you can't ignore the rest of the world. That's what "world" champion means.

As far as I know, Shane hasn't won a tournament that has had a full Taiwanese contingent. Correct me if I'm wrong. So even if you want to pretend that a non-world-championship actually counts as a world championship, at least pick some event that has the Kos and Changs and the rest of them in it. You can't possibly have a world championship without representation from the nation the produces a huge number of the world's best players, probably more than any other.

But a better thing to do is wait until he wins an actual world championship. Then he will be a world champion. Until then he won't.
 
Last edited:
The only thing that's being brought up is WHAT is the definition of a world championship.

Shane HAS won an event put on as a world event with a world class field of players and as pitiful as it is a world class payout.

Since past acknowledged world champions have won tournaments that were called world championships that were NOT sanctioned by the WPA, the question arises what is different about the world championship that Shane won from those events???

The answer is that there is no difference except that people don't want to acknowledge them because Shane won it.

If you acknowledge Earl as a five time world champion, then you have to acknowledge Shane as a 1 time world Champion or you are a hypocrite. That is what was being brought up.

Even that isn't the REAL question though.

Any time someone brings up the opinion that Shane is the best in the world, the SAME people have come up with some excuse as to why he isn't. Oh they try to mask it by saying he's ONE of the best or that they HOPE he becomes the best, but that's all obfuscation and bullshit.

First it's well he hasn't proved himself over a several year period, then when he does that, he only wins in the US and isn't a World Champion yet, then when he wins an international title with world in the name, oh well he still isn't a world champion because he hasn't won a world championship, then when it's pointed out that he DID win a world championship in 2007, it's but that wasn't sanctioned by the WPA, then when it's pointed out that other world championships have been acknowledged as such when they weren't sanctioned by the WPA, it's "What were we talking about"...

It's always some excuse to knock Shane down and it gets tired and it's pretty transparent to anyone with half a brain what's going on.

I wasn't that way when Efren was the best in the world, although I DO know people that were and would deny his being the best based on whatever you want to call it, National pride, Racism, whatever. I didn't abide that attitude closed lipped when it was my fellow countrymen doing it and I don't abide it when it's other people doing it...

Jaden

Shane is laughing all the way to the bank making over twice the money of any other player on the planet every year!! I doubt he's losing any sleep in what any of the haters say.. No matter what any of these guys say he still wakes up every morning Shane Van Boening and they wake up well... Haters:grin-square:
 
Last edited:
Of course I'm not Shane...

everyone knows, or should know, what Shane's handle on AZ was/is.

I haven't hidden who I am, anyone could have watched me play this weekend in San Diego.

I'm also not a Shane Nuthugger any more than I was an Efren nuthugger in the nineties and early 2000's.

I believe that Shane is CURRENTLY the best player on the planet and he's proven it time and again doing things that just haven't ever been done, or things that have only been done by Efren (back to back DCC one pocket wins for example).

half of the US Open titles in the last eight years. all of them for the last three.

nine and ten ball USBTC champion the same year. high placing in the one pocket and eightball at the same venue.

I was saying the same things about efren when he was winning one hole at dcc practically every year and master of the table.

Any one else who accomplishes similar domination I will say the same things about.

It doesn't make me a nuthugger. It makes me astute at observation and willing to acknowledge truth.

Hey Maybe Ko Pin Yi will be better than Shane, but right now he hasn't done enough to drown out the greatness that Shane has shown and no one else in the last several years has shown as much dominance as Shane.

Jaden
 
everyone knows, or should know, what Shane's handle on AZ was/is.

I haven't hidden who I am, anyone could have watched me play this weekend in San Diego.

I'm also not a Shane Nuthugger any more than I was an Efren nuthugger in the nineties and early 2000's.

I believe that Shane is CURRENTLY the best player on the planet and he's proven it time and again doing things that just haven't ever been done, or things that have only been done by Efren (back to back DCC one pocket wins for example).

half of the US Open titles in the last eight years. all of them for the last three.

nine and ten ball USBTC champion the same year. high placing in the one pocket and eightball at the same venue.

I was saying the same things about efren when he was winning one hole at dcc practically every year and master of the table.

Any one else who accomplishes similar domination I will say the same things about.

It doesn't make me a nuthugger. It makes me astute at observation and willing to acknowledge truth.

Hey Maybe Ko Pin Yi will be better than Shane, but right now he hasn't done enough to drown out the greatness that Shane has shown and no one else in the last several years has shown as much dominance as Shane.

Jaden

He's the best player in the US for sure.
 
Hey Maybe Ko Pin Yi will be better than Shane, but right now he hasn't done enough to drown out the greatness that Shane has shown and no one else in the last several years has shown as much dominance as Shane.

Jaden

aside from winning US Open titles, where else did Shane dominate? if we're talking about "dominance in the last several years", it would be dennis orcollo IMO.
 
Last edited:
aside from winning US Open titles, where else did Shane dominate? if we're talking about "dominance in the last several years", it would be dennis orcollo IMO.

spot on

where is this dominance? the weak US open field? and won the derby?
orcullo and Appleton have forgot more titles than shane has and prestigious ones, 8,9,10 world champions, gold medal, intnational challenge of champions US opens, US one pocket back to back and the funniest thing about daz an orcullo]]

orcullo only started playing banks n one pocket couple years ago, and shit daz only started playing American pool in 07 same year svb went pro so I think if your talking dominance these 2 are ahead of the curve
 
I think the debate in this thread is ultimately unimportant.


Shane is the best all-around player in the world today, and his name is already mentionable with those of Lassiter, Sigel and Varner. It may soon be mentionable with Reyes.

Shane might be the best rotation games player in the world. Ko Pin Yi beat him handily twice in Vegas this July, so it's at least debatable.

Shane has four US Open 9-ball titles and three Derby City 9-ball titles.

Shane has won multiple DCC Master of the Table titles.

Shane is already an all-time great.

Shane is already a legend of the game.

Number one however is this:

Shane is 31

The WPA titles like Japan, China and the World 9-ball will all appear on Shane's resume soon. It's only a matter of time, and then we can debate whether he's the greatest player ever.

Patience please.
 
^unfortunately though, someone confirmed that Shane is not participating in All-Japan Open this week. as a pool fan, i'm disapponted. :(
seems his priority is the MC.
 
Last edited:
^unfortunately though, someone confirmed that Shane is not participating in All-Japan Open this week. as a pool fan, i'm disapponted. :(
seems his priority is the MC.

His name appears in the Japan Open brackets in Group 2.
 
blahblahblah

shane this, shane that, whatever.
in american baseball they call the last games of the season
the world series.
isn't baseball a multi-billion dollar industry?
 
Back
Top