Then why don't you help out Mr. Bond 2 hen it comes to finding them original Brunswick pool tables with 4 1/2" corner pockets seeing how you seem to think you know so much. My life 9ft working on pool tables exceeds Mr. Bonds time frame in this industry as well, and I'm sure yours too. Your friends pool playing habits have nothing to do with my expertise when it comes to my knowledge of pool tables, and how to build them, as well as how to rebuild them. So, it should be simple to produce the proof needed to back up his claim, maybe he just needs your help:thumbup: Who knows, maybe Brunswick did build a pocket table with tight pockets, maybe I'll learn something new, but I just want to see the proof....not hear....because I just know they did....as proof without backing it up with real proof....know what I meanThat does not prevent you or anyone else from being wrong.
I know a player that has been playing for many years, has his own table, pockets balls well. He absolutely refuses to belive that slow rolling a ball makes it harder to pocket it in most cases, and we can't for the life of us get him to play position when you have to go a rail or two to get a lot better shape. He was just arguing with someone about when two frozen are hit you can stroke straight through and it not being a foul. Even after he was shown the rules. His stance is that even if 1,000 people say something to him, or he is shown the rule, it's all wrong. I said about him "if his head was cut off, he'd argue that he is not dead for another 10 minutes" to a friend in a text when he was telling me that he was refusing to belive the rules where what they were.
If the professional play was dictated to be on 4.5" pockets, why would a huge company like Brunswick not produce tables for that standard? It's like someone saying that 90 sq inches was to be the official standard for pro tennis and Prince just made 100.
Last edited: