Corey Learns Alex and Scott

Black-Balled

Black-Balled

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Well, first off, this is a very good match. Lots of moving in this one.

Brandon is a damn solid 1p player, but he gets a bad roll at 1-1, making a ball off the spot and following a ball near Alex's hole in to scratch...after which point Alex does not take his hands of my shuff's throat...:sorry:

But check out the end. Looks like Alex is going to run them all, till he gets distracted...at which point Corey shows his savant:

It is at 1:23.16

Gawdammit!
http://youtu.be/wQsOS8MaPo8
 
Atlatlien said:
Nice. That's a ridiculous shot and exactly why I love seeing Corey play
Click to expand...

Yes, but he didn't make the shot.

I just chuckle when I see players (of all levels) attempt to shoot a difficult shot over and over.
The funny part is when they get close to making it, they stop shooting the shot.

Why? They didn't successfully complete the shot.
They make it look like they accomplished something by merely getting close.

Instead of showing us what you are trying to do, how about actually doing it.
 
boogeyman said:
Yes, but he didn't make the shot.

I just chuckle when I see players (of all levels) attempt to shoot a difficult shot over and over.
The funny part is when they get close to making it, they stop shooting the shot.

Why? They didn't successfully complete the shot.
They make it look like they accomplished something by merely getting close.

Instead of showing us what you are trying to do, how about actually doing it.
Click to expand...

If the intent of the shot was only to pocket a ball. He missed. If the intent was to keep both balls near your pocket and leave your opponent shooting from Brunswick,very nice. :cool:
 
alphadog said:
If the intent of the shot was only to pocket a ball. He missed. If the intent was to keep both balls near your pocket and leave your opponent shooting from Brunswick,very nice. :cool:
Click to expand...

This 100%


I guess from where he was leaving both balls by his hole and his opponent froze back upstairs isnt good enough.

Hopefully we get a video of a better solution by a fellow AZer in this thread.
 
ddadams said:
This 100%


I guess from where he was leaving both balls by his hole and his opponent froze back upstairs isnt good enough.

Hopefully we get a video of a better solution by a fellow AZer in this thread.
Click to expand...

Hahahaa...there is no better solution than both nuggets rolling to your hole and the whitey gone north, but I think that was your point.

Imagine it that was the 2nd shot after the break and the stack was there. Be like getting bangcock!
 
The point is that it was a two way shot. If he makes the bank, he has a shot on the other ball. If not, he plays safe by freezing the CB to the far rail. This was a great shot even to see, let alone play perfectly. :thumbup:

Scott Lee
http://poolknowledge.com

alphadog said:
If the intent of the shot was only to pocket a ball. He missed. If the intent was to keep both balls near your pocket and leave your opponent shooting from Brunswick,very nice. :cool:
Click to expand...
 
boogeyman said:
Yes, but he didn't make the shot.

I just chuckle when I see players (of all levels) attempt to shoot a difficult shot over and over.
The funny part is when they get close to making it, they stop shooting the shot.

Why? They didn't successfully complete the shot.
They make it look like they accomplished something by merely getting close.

Instead of showing us what you are trying to do, how about actually doing it.
Click to expand...

The shot was a success.....the bonus is if goes in.

This shot is why I call Corey the American Reyes....he's always worth watching.
 
Game winner

The object is to make both balls in 1 shot, this shot is actually very predictable. Once I saw the shot I had to try it! So I tried it maybe 50 times, of those 50 I made both balls maybe twice, made 1 ball maybe 10 times, sold out 3 times and that was only when hit bad! I def can't wait to lose my money shooting it for some dough :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top