Bergman vs Shaw updates

[Celtic]

A Home and Home match has been offered to Morra.

He will not accept it.

One whines.

The other offers to play.

Screw "home and home". John offered to play on neutral ground for all the marbles.

If Justin needs his blanky and soother in order to match up that is weak sauce.

He just beat Shaw. He previously beat Morra. Morra is offering a straight up match on neutral turf on a standard pool table. If that is not good enough for Bergman that is super weak...

 

[Teacherman]

Well the way he talks you would think he's been a 9 ft monster for yrs ,, when in fact he's had 2 good yrs , and many of his big wins have yes been on a barbox ,, so I don't how solid that info was

1

Yes, it's apparent you can't determine the quality of the info.

 

[one stroke]

Yes, it's apparent you can't determine the quality of the info.

All you need to do is go to the money list

1

 

[Teacherman]

Ah yes.....the $2000 entry fee bar box win paid more than the $200 entry fee 9' win.

So, I repeat....

Yes, it's apparent you can't determine the quality of the info.

 

[mikeyfrost]

Looks like the next big money match for Bergman might be John Morra he is woofing at Justin to play this is what he just posted on Justin's Facebook

View attachment 399231

I was hanging with Morra last night and he was extremely clear in one thing....anywhere outside of his home he wants Bergman. He doesn't want him as bad as that post reads though IMO but he definitely would like to play him again.

I personally don't see the result changing, but what do I know.

 

[Johnnyt]

I didn't hear too much Shane bashing when he was playing most of his action matches on the TAR table among a lot of his friends. Why bash Justin for wanting to play at home? Johnnyt

 

[Rhea]

I like John Morra, but he can not win no matter what table they play on.

 

[jojopiff]

Thanks for finally getting it.

All the AZB'ers were guessing. And spewing uninformed nonsense. And rejecting the informed knowledge.

We knew/know.

I bought the stream and enjoyed it quite thoroughly and thought you did a good job on the stream.

Then, you've come on here and berated the very people whom are going to purchase your streams.

I haven't renewed my Bergman fan club membership so I don't know everything about him. But I didn't know that was a prerequisite to purchase the stream or watch 2 great players compete, but worry no longer as I will never purchase anything you do ever again.

 

[Teacherman]

I bought the stream and enjoyed it quite thoroughly and thought you did a good job on the stream.

Then, you've come on here and berated the very people whom are going to purchase your streams.

I haven't renewed my Bergman fan club membership so I don't know everything about him. But I didn't know that was a prerequisite to purchase the stream or watch 2 great players compete, but worry no longer as I will never purchase anything you do ever again.

Now this is hilarious.

This is GENIUS cause and effect.

 

[jojopiff]

Now this is hilarious.

This is GENIUS cause and effect.

Cause - You've acted like a complete a-hole in here.

Effect - I have no interest in supporting a-holes.

I'm confused by your confusion.

 

[Teacherman]

Yes.... I realize pool enthusiasts don't like when their opinions are proven wrong.

My point is and has been.....Justin and Jayson are both great players. In my opinion it was a 'pick em' contest. Either could win.

My point of contention was the BarBoxBergman nonsense.

OTHERS....relied on their false opinion that Justin was a bar box player and therefore could not win.

DESPITE evidence to the contrary....they continue to want to justify their stance.

DESPITE the fact that he is a known quality one pocket player.

DESPITE the fact that Justin had beaten several big name pros on the 9 foot table, IN THE LAST 3 MONTHS OR SO, and had recently won a 9 foot tournament with several big name players such as Johnny Archer and John Morra....and placed high in another.....they then try to rationalize their stance based on past....old....information about his bar box winnings.

And I'm the bad guy for pointing it out....educating them.

I'm sorry if the facts aren't on your side.

I didn't make them up.

 

[jojopiff]

I concede, although I've never said anything about Bergman at all (on any size table) and just commenting on your demeanor, but

Justin Bergman is the Chuck Norris of 9' tables.





***Public Service Announcement***
This is NOT a dig at Bergman at all. Just the guy delivering this message.

 

[Thecoats]

I concede, although I've never said anything about Bergman at all (on any size table) and just commenting on your demeanor, but

Justin Bergman is the Chuck Norris of 9' tables.





***Public Service Announcement***
This is NOT a dig at Bergman at all. Just the guy delivering this message.

I am confused now. Does Justin know Tae Kwon Do and drive a big Dodge Power Wagon?

 

[jojopiff]

I am confused now. Does Justin know Tae Kwon Do and drive a big Dodge Power Wagon?

Sounds like someone else hasn't renewed their Bergman Fan Club membership. Renew and the Teacherman will put you on the list for the monthly email blast in which he keeps us, the uninformed, informed on Mr Bergmans 9' table victories.

 

[Teacherman]

Um.....the conversation didn't include you.

You've not offered anything to the topic.

All you've done is attack me.

I have not attacked you.

I clarified my position.

If you'd like a pissing match I'm game.

 

[lorider]

Um.....the conversation didn't include you.

You've not offered anything to the topic.

All you've done is attack me.

I have not attacked you.

I clarified my position.

If you'd like a pissing match I'm game.

Damn !

I have no dog in this fight . I never commented on the match and did not care who won.

However I just gotta get in this pissin match.

Oh shit...boss comin..i will join it later

 

[one stroke]

Yes.... I realize pool enthusiasts don't like when their opinions are proven wrong.

My point is and has been.....Justin and Jayson are both great players. In my opinion it was a 'pick em' contest. Either could win.

My point of contention was the BarBoxBergman nonsense.

OTHERS....relied on their false opinion that Justin was a bar box player and therefore could not win.

DESPITE evidence to the contrary....they continue to want to justify their stance.

DESPITE the fact that he is a known quality one pocket player.

DESPITE the fact that Justin had beaten several big name pros on the 9 foot table, IN THE LAST 3 MONTHS OR SO, and had recently won a 9 foot tournament with several big name players such as Johnny Archer and John Morra....and placed high in another.....they then try to rationalize their stance based on past....old....information about his bar box winnings.

And I'm the bad guy for pointing it out....educating them.

I'm sorry if the facts aren't on your side.

I didn't make them up.

Actually your not educating anybody ,, Justin could barly rub 2 nickels together before 2014 off of pool winnings ,,
He has been considerd one of the favorites on barboxes for quite sometime he's just recently reached that status on a 9,, he's not a favorite at the U.S. Open

1

 

[BeiberLvr]

Actually your not educating anybody ,, Justin could barly rub 2 nickels together before 2014 off of pool winnings ,,
He has been considerd one of the favorites on barboxes for quite sometime he's just recently reached that status on a 9,, he's not a favorite at the U.S. Open

1

Newsflash.

No one is a favorite at this year's open.

 

[one stroke]

Newsflash.

No one is a favorite at this year's open.

That's right there is not one but several and he's not one of them


1

 

[amicenheimer]

Would you be surprised if Justin won it? I certainly wouldn't.