Millions of Views!!!!

[JB Cases]

How about this one?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpl...w4wvoy1542nk0k&google_view_type#gpluscomments

What happens is when people make videos trying to understand what is happening at a more fundamental level, they get called "knockers" and then get told that the sky isn't blue!

I didn't call you a knocker. You have provided a point of discussion and it has been answered.

If you want to think of yourself as a knocker that is certainly your right to do so.

But if you remain the only one who bothers to describe your issues with CTE in video format the net result will be that more people will still come to CTE because we are more than willing to answer any questions with video demonstration.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk

 

[ENGLISH!]

I could see one possible reason it wouldn't work perfectly on a snooker table... The nap of the cloth. Pinks off their spot to the middle pockets played slowly have to be aimed to miss the pocket because they roll off. I've tried CTE on snooker tables and it works ok. It is hard to keep visuals and CCB locked in when stretching for most shots but I'm sure there is a way around it... Its hard keeping anything locked in when stretching for that matter.

I think CTE being introduced to the snooker community has to be done right. They are not as open to aiming systems as the pool community and if Stan gets involved in pissing matches, or anyone for that matter it will not stand a chance. Just a little bit of advice to those who let their emotions get the better of them in response to CTE critics... If you want to help snooker players and CTE grow.. Keep it civil and professional.

Pidge,

Do you really see that (the blue) standing a chance? Brits have been known to 'not suffer 'fools' well'. I don't mean that literally, but look to what CTEers have resorted when they can not find any logical reasonable explanation or 'arguments'... Bully Tactics & Attack the Messengers.

And... that comes out quickly, even when one is simply asking a question trying to learn the system & get passed an issue, like Dan White, if even just a smidgen of doubt in the 'system' is detected. It's BELIEVE or you're a 'HATER'.

I'll just stop there & not get into why CTE is not what it is said to be.

As to the thread topic, Million of Views. That is troubling to me because those videos are one sided from one misguided point of view & not rooted in reality. The 'promise' of a possible 'objective' method of aiming is very enticing & many will succumb to that intrigue, I did for a brief time.

I can only hope that not too many will waste too much time going down the Yellow Brick Road looking for something that simply does not exist.

Best Wishes to All.

 

[ENGLISH!]

I didn't call you a knocker. You have provided a point of discussion and it has been answered.

If you want to think of yourself as a knocker that is certainly your right to do so.

But if you remain the only one who bothers to describe your issues with CTE in video format the net result will be that more people will still come to CTE because we are more than willing to answer any questions with video demonstration.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk

John,

Once again, VIDEO 'demonstrations' prove nothing regarding an abstract nature. I'll just stop there.

Best Wishes.

 

[Dan White]

I didn't call you a knocker. You have provided a point of discussion and it has been answered.

If you want to think of yourself as a knocker that is certainly your right to do so.

But if you remain the only one who bothers to describe your issues with CTE in video format the net result will be that more people will still come to CTE because we are more than willing to answer any questions with video demonstration.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk

I never said you called me a knocker. Stan did. He's the one who said he hopes I never get a copy of his DVD. You are more the one who says the sky isn't blue.. JB, if you and others are unwilling to challenge your own assumptions about CTE then what is the point, video or no video?

 

[Ron Swanson]

ALL answers to your questions will come when you answer the one I asked first...
NAME PLEASE. No sense talking to know it all no name trolls who are sh*t scared to identify themselves.

Get a life, stay where you belong in snooker forums.

Actually, you didn't ask me that until i asked you yours...

But my name and how i play is irrelevant to this discussion. Stan's reluctance to take CTE to the snooker world is a question that is highly relevant to this discussion, so answer the question.

I am genuinely baffled why the inventor of an innovative product or system doesn't want to capitalise on it by launching it in the only professional cue sport there is. It makes no sense.

 

[Dan White]

Actually, you didn't ask me that until i asked you yours...

But my name and how i play is irrelevant to this discussion. Stan's reluctance to take CTE to the snooker world is a question that is highly relevant to this discussion, so answer the question.

I am genuinely baffled why the inventor of an innovative product or system doesn't want to capitalise on it by launching it in the only professional cue sport there is. It makes no sense.

Especially in light of this statement when discussing snooker:

Concerning the difficulty of "locking in on visuals" for some shots, that issue has been completely resolved and no longer exists in any manner for any type of shot.

Stan Shuffett

 

[stan shuffett]

Actually, you didn't ask me that until i asked you yours...

But my name and how i play is irrelevant to this discussion. Stan's reluctance to take CTE to the snooker world is a question that is highly relevant to this discussion, so answer the question.

I am genuinely baffled why the inventor of an innovative product or system doesn't want to capitalise on it by launching it in the only professional cue sport there is. It makes no sense.

No reluctance on my part.........Cte is just getting good and started. Don't even think for one minute that CTE is not slated for the Snooker world.

Stan Shuffett

 

[SpiderWebComm]

Actually, you didn't ask me that until i asked you yours...

But my name and how i play is irrelevant to this discussion. Stan's reluctance to take CTE to the snooker world is a question that is highly relevant to this discussion, so answer the question.

I am genuinely baffled why the inventor of an innovative product or system doesn't want to capitalise on it by launching it in the only professional cue sport there is. It makes no sense.

Will you cut the TROLLING crap already! That's all you're good for. I implied it in Post #30. Did you need a special handwritten invitation for your name delivered by the Queen herself? Your stupid question came in Post #31 and it's NOT MY PLACE to answer for Stan, which he's already done twice.

Names of members, how they play, and videos of them demonstrating or playing are NEVER irrelevant to a pool forum. If somebody was a know it all like yourself but blowing off about how to shoot a pistol or rifle accurately on a gun forum yet couldn't hit the broad side of a barn let alone a bullseye, it proves or disproves everything and is highly relevant. ACTION TALKS and BULLSH*T WALKS which you're very full of.

How often do you make trips to the United States? Maybe Stan doesn't like boats or airplanes and loves being with his family more. Either way...it's NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS, TROLL.

He answered the question.

 

[SpiderWebComm]

John,

Once again, VIDEO 'demonstrations' prove nothing regarding an abstract nature. I'll just stop there.

Best Wishes.

Why don't you just stop POSTING PERIOD in CTE or aiming threads? What in the hell is wrong with you already?

Go make some TOI video demonstrations and continue to promote that since CJ isn't here any more. At least it will be positive. Don't forget to introduce yourself on the video so we can have a "real name" to go along with a big mouth and know it all attitude like Ron Swanson aka Thaiger.

 

[Ron Swanson]

Will you cut the TROLLING crap already! That's all you're good for. I implied it in Post #30. Did you need a special handwritten invitation for your name delivered by the Queen herself? Your stupid question came in Post #31 and it's NOT MY PLACE to answer for Stan, which he's already done twice.

Names of members, how they play, and videos of them demonstrating or playing are NEVER irrelevant to a pool forum. If somebody was a know it all like yourself but blowing off about how to shoot a pistol or rifle accurately on a gun forum yet couldn't hit the broad side of a barn let alone a bullseye, it proves or disproves everything and is highly relevant. ACTION TALKS and BULLSH*T WALKS which you're very full of.

How often do you make trips to the United States? Maybe Stan doesn't like boats or airplanes and loves being with his family more. Either way...it's NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS, TROLL.

He answered the question.

Lol. Could you tell me which part of 'imply' is actually asking a question?

I am merely giving you the opportunity to speculate on why stan hasn't yet launched his product on to the snooker world. You are free not to offer an opinion, in much the same way i am free to express mine. Neither of us has to sign our name in blood or pledge allegiance to the queen to do so.

I know why he hasn't done so and so do you, but one of us is in denial about it and has become hysterical.

 

[Ron Swanson]

No reluctance on my part.........Cte is just getting good and started. Don't even think for one minute that CTE is not slated for the Snooker world.

Stan Shuffett

Ok, cool. I wouldn't hang about though - I'd say snooker has about 5 more years until it goes into steep decline. CTE could be the shot in the arm it is looking for. I would get your book published in china if i were you, as i suspect the masses of chinese currently going for snooker will be more receptive to the idea than the established markets.

 

[SpiderWebComm]

My Sunday prayer: Dear Lord...please tap Mr. Wilson or Mike Howerton on the shoulder and whisper to them to BAN THE TWO BIGGEST TROLL TROUBLE MAKERS on this website, RON SWANSON AKA THAIGER and ENGLISH "RICK".
I understand pestilence has come and gone since the beginning of time but this one needs to go already. Please Lord...thank you.

 

[Ron Swanson]

Dear Lord, please let spidey see the errors of his ways in calling for people to be banned, for he faileth to notice his own numerous indiscretions, and may endeth up banished himself.

Forsooth, let thoseth without sin cast the first stone, especially those who cannot aim them correctly.

 

[Dan White]

My Sunday prayer: Dear Lord...please tap Mr. Wilson or Mike Howerton on the shoulder and whisper to them to BAN THE TWO BIGGEST TROLL TROUBLE MAKERS on this website, RON SWANSON AKA THAIGER and ENGLISH "RICK".
I understand pestilence has come and gone since the beginning of time but this one needs to go already. Please Lord...thank you.

SpiderWebComm: Why so angry? In this thread here are the words you've used to describe other forum members:

clueless
deathly afraid
hack
lacking character
liar
man with a severe mental disorder
petrified chickensh*t
clueless fraud
scared
a "know it all"
sh*t scared
troll
stupid
full of sh*t

By my reckoning not one of these nasty barbs was returned.

 

[Neil]

Dan, you say none were returned. Yet, you fail to state what all was said before Spidey said anything. Here's just a sample:



-no common sense (any user of it)
-no natural aptitude (any user of any aiming system)
-not real players (any user of any aiming system)
-not as claimed
-illogical
-goes against science
-not rational (any statement by any user)
-not logical (any statement by any user)
-purely subjective (which means anyone claiming objective at all is a liar)
-misrepresenting the truth (any statement by any user)
-have reading comprehension issues (any user)
-fools (any user)
-bullies (anyone that responds to the nonsense in any way)
-not rooted in reality (anyone that believes CTE or any aiming system works)

 

[SpiderWebComm]

SpiderWebComm: Why so angry? In this thread here are the words you've used to describe other forum members:

clueless
deathly afraid
hack
lacking character
liar
man with a severe mental disorder
petrified chickensh*t
clueless fraud
scared
a "know it all"
sh*t scared
troll
stupid
full of sh*t

By my reckoning not one of these nasty barbs was returned.

Neil was correct, they were PRECIPITATED before my responses which I guess you casually overlooked for whatever reason.

You and I have never had a post back and forth to each other until this one of yours.

Aren't you the guy who whined and cried about being called a "knocker" for posting things about CTE when nobody called you a "knocker" at all...ever?

Why are SO ANGRY DAN? Is it because you really are in the anti-CTE group and are trying everything possible to discredit it?

I think everyone has been very civil to you especially since you've given your real name as we all non-trolls have, and done videos of ourselves at the table. You're a pretty decent player and I respect that.

I have gone into the archives of RSB which was pretty much before my time but do know you were in the anti-CTE crowd back then and a staunch follower of your hero and God, Pat Johnson along with some others.

Does that still have something to do with your actions and motivations?

NEIL...GREAT POST!! I wouldn't have had the energy and focus to do it!! I LOVE IT!

 

[JB Cases]

Gave a quick CTE lesson tonight at TAP Nationals. So cool to see people interested and ready to learn.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk

 

[Ron Swanson]

Dan, you say none were returned. Yet, you fail to state what all was said before Spidey said anything. Here's just a sample:



-no common sense (any user of it)
-no natural aptitude (any user of any aiming system)
-not real players (any user of any aiming system)
-not as claimed
-illogical
-goes against science
-not rational (any statement by any user)
-not logical (any statement by any user)
-purely subjective (which means anyone claiming objective at all is a liar)
-misrepresenting the truth (any statement by any user)
-have reading comprehension issues (any user)
-fools (any user)
-bullies (anyone that responds to the nonsense in any way)
-not rooted in reality (anyone that believes CTE or any aiming system works)

Which of those are 'nasty barbs'?

 

[ENGLISH!]

Gave a quick CTE lesson tonight at TAP Nationals. So cool to see people interested and ready to learn.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk

John,

Why would anyone not want to learn an objective aiming 'system' that unlocks the magic & mystery of how pool balls connect to a 2:1 ratio table & gives everyone the ability to pocket the ball regardless of how it is aligned with the cue ball on the table?

Unfortunately for those pursuing that, such a system simply does not factually exist.

So... it would certainly seem that they are really wasting their time, IF that is what they hope to find at the end of their pursuit.

Why not call it what it actually is?

I method that could enhance one's ability, IF the time is put in to learn the subjective perceptions for the shots based off of CTE's different 'objective' visual markers. Sort of a hybrid of the objective/subjective perceptions required by any aiming methods but is more structured than most & hence perhaps a more overall better playing method than at least some other methods.

If we can get past this quagmire, then perhaps some cooperative efforts of discussion could be had to perhaps figure out what keeps it from working for those that have put in the time with it & have not gotten any significantly good results.

The thing is that some of us know that answer while others refuse to consider it.

Perhaps if some were not looking & hoping for a truly objective 'system', then perhaps they would have gone in with a better mind set & put in a different type of effort & perhaps would have gotten better results.

Best Wishes to You & All.

PS I might guess that in the hub bub you either overlooked of perhaps forgot about my earlier question in reference to a statement that you made. If Pros can make almost any shot 'at will' does it mean that they are using an objective aiming 'system'?

 

[JoeyInCali]

John,

Why would anyone not want to learn an objective aiming 'system' that unlocks the magic & mystery of how pool balls connect to a 2:1 ratio table & gives everyone the ability to pocket the ball regardless of how it is aligned with the cue ball on the table?

Unfortunately for those pursuing that, such a system simply does not factually exist.

So... it would certainly seem that they are really wasting their time, IF that is what they hope to find at the end of their pursuit.

Why not call it what it actually is?

I method that could enhance one's ability, IF the time is put in to learn the subjective perceptions for the shots based off of CTE's different 'objective' visual markers. Sort of a hybrid of the objective/subjective perceptions required by most aiming methods but more structured than most & hence perhaps a more overall better playing method than at least some other methods.

If we can get past this quagmire, then perhaps some cooperative efforts of discussion could be had to perhaps figure out what keeps it from working for those that have put in the time with it & have not gotten any significantly good results.

The thing is that some of us know that answer while others refuse to consider it.

Perhaps if some were not looking & hoping for a truely objective 'system', then perhaps they would have gone in with a better mind set & put in a different type of effort & perhaps would have gotten better results.

Best Wishes to You & All.

PS I might guess that in the hub bub you either overlooked of perhaps forgot about my earlier question in reference to a statement that you made. If Pros can make almost any shot 'at will' does it mean that they are using an objective aiming 'system'?

Nah, let it be .
Then you can have a good sample size after a year or two.
This is my opinion only, if you have problems pocketing balls on a bar box after playing for so many years, your stroke is crooked .