English.....
So here we are.
I'm ofering just this very last opportunity for this to find a happy ending.
Here's the deal. You are not banned ( yet ) and may POST in threads that YOU create in regard to aiming discussions.
YOU may NOT post in anyone else's thread nor reply to anyone's posts in any aiming conversation thread that YOU did not create.
You may start threads and anone that wishes to participate in your conversation may do so.
Any variance from this will result in a permanent ban from AZB.
There won't be any more peace offers.
Dave
So here we are.
I'm ofering just this very last opportunity for this to find a happy ending.
Here's the deal. You are not banned ( yet ) and may POST in threads that YOU create in regard to aiming discussions.
YOU may NOT post in anyone else's thread nor reply to anyone's posts in any aiming conversation thread that YOU did not create.
You may start threads and anone that wishes to participate in your conversation may do so.
Any variance from this will result in a permanent ban from AZB.
There won't be any more peace offers.
Dave
John,
Why would anyone not want to learn an objective aiming 'system' that unlocks the magic & mystery of how pool balls connect to a 2:1 ratio table & gives everyone the ability to pocket the ball regardless of how it is aligned with the cue ball on the table?
Unfortunately for those pursuing that, such a system simply does not factually exist.
So... it would certainly seem that they are really wasting their time, IF that is what they hope to find at the end of their pursuit.
Why not call it what it actually is?
I method that could enhance one's ability, IF the time is put in to learn the subjective perceptions for the shots based off of CTE's different 'objective' visual markers. Sort of a hybrid of the objective/subjective perceptions required by most aiming methods but more structured than most & hence perhaps a more overall better playing method than at least some other methods.
If we can get past this quagmire, then perhaps some cooperative efforts of discussion could be had to perhaps figure out what keeps it from working for those that have put in the time with it & have not gotten any significantly good results.
The thing is that some of us know that answer while others refuse to consider it.
Perhaps if some were not looking & hoping for a truely objective 'system', then perhaps they would have gone in with a better mind set & put in a different type of effort & perhaps would have gotten better results.
Best Wishes to You & All.
PS I might guess that in the hub bub you either overlooked of perhaps forgot about my earlier question in reference to a statement that you made. If Pros can make almost any shot 'at will' does it mean that they are using an objective aiming 'system'?