Discussing CTE with Stan Shuffett

So, if I produce a video where I state that I use the little green man with a hit here sign that is all that needed as proof then huh.

I state that I wait until he walks out on the table with the sign to point at the OB. I point with my cue where he is standing.

I then state he raises the sign to the point needed to make the ball.

I then do the that shot and make it.

Bingo....proof of the little green man with a hit here sign as a valid aiming system that anyone can use.

It must be proof cause I made a video using it.

How is that any different than saying "ghost" instead of "little green man"?

edit- There is a thread on the main forum about the myth of ghost ball that you might enjoy.
 
Look at the 5 shots with the same line up. This is just one issue that will always be there. The proof is in Stan's video. Many wont see it the way you guy's do.
Then dissect it on video.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk
 
If he put it on video it wouldn't be proof. You can't prove such things with a video.

pj <- for the zillionth time
chgo

Here we go again with "videos prove nothing" by Pat "The Final Word On Pool" Johnson.

If videos prove nothing, EVERY VIDEO done by Dave Alciatore and Bob Jewett prove nothing. They're bogus, worthless total wastes of time for them to have been made as well as those who view it. When they made the videos they were trying to prove something. Where did it go wrong?

The videos done by Joe Tucker teaching how to apply contact point aiming with the training balls and numbers on them, the table grid, and how to match the numbers when aiming between the OB and CB must also prove nothing. When Joe made the videos he was trying to prove something. Where did it go wrong?

You gave live lessons to clueless Northwestern University pool beginners who never picked up a cue in their life and dazzled them with your laser beam pen on contact points and they thought you were some kind of pool rock star. Did it help to teach (prove) anything to them? If the answer is "yes", what would be the difference if your beyond professional lesson was captured on video to prove and reinforce everything you taught as they watched it again?

And IF any one of those students copied every word of your script, set balls up while illustrating contact points and then shot them into pockets while making a video as they did it...wouldn't it prove they now knew what they were talking about and how to perform it? Conversely if they made a video and stated a number of INCORRECT points based on what was taught either in a live lesson or your video lesson, wouldn't it prove they didn't yet know what the hell they were doing or talking about? Also valuable and revealing proof.

Same thing can be done with CTE. But somehow or another it proves NOTHING when YOU or Dan White have to be at the table on video as you throw out the same lame excuse time and again.
 
Last edited:
So, if I produce a video where I state that I use the little green man with a hit here sign that is all that needed as proof then huh.

I state that I wait until he walks out on the table with the sign to point at the OB. I point with my cue where he is standing.

I then state he raises the sign to the point needed to make the ball.

I then do the that shot and make it.

Bingo....proof of the little green man with a hit here sign as a valid aiming system that anyone can use.

It must be proof cause I made a video using it.

What were you trying to PROVE when you made the "pool for 1st graders" videos as you shot simple cut shots and draws that Stevie Wonder could have executed and then put them up on youtube?

I can't imagine how life changing it must have been for the millions of pool players who happened to stumble upon them. Proof positive.
 
We already know (for years and years now) that you don't know the difference, Spidey - no need to keep demonstrating that.

pj <- and apparently never will
chgo

And I (WE) already know (for years and years now) that you would deflect everything with one of your lame come backs and not respond directly to the post about videos because you have nothing of substance and no answer.

PJ - you continue to have a need to demonstrate your goofball excuses for not getting on the table to make a video because it would reveal your ineptness.

and apparently always will.

You need to start shooting more balls and growing a pair for yourself instead of hiding behind the keyboard.
 
Here we go again with "videos prove nothing" by Pat "The Final Word On Pool" Johnson.

If videos prove nothing, EVERY VIDEO done by Dave Alciatore and Bob Jewett prove nothing. They're bogus, worthless total wastes of time for them to have been made as well as those who view it. When they made the videos they were trying to prove something. Where did it go wrong?

The videos done by Joe Tucker teaching how to apply contact point aiming with the training balls and numbers on them, the table grid, and how to match the numbers when aiming between the OB and CB must also prove nothing. When Joe made the videos he was trying to prove something. Where did it go wrong?

You gave live lessons to clueless Northwestern University pool beginners who never picked up a cue in their life and dazzled them with your laser beam pen on contact points and they thought you were some kind of pool rock star. Did it help to teach (prove) anything to them? If the answer is "yes", what would be the difference if your beyond professional lesson was captured on video to prove and reinforce everything you taught as they watched it again?

And IF any one of those students copied every word of your script, set balls up while illustrating contact points and then shot them into pockets while making a video as they did it...wouldn't it prove they now knew what they were talking about and how to perform it? Conversely if they made a video and stated a number of INCORRECT points based on what was taught either in a live lesson or your video lesson, wouldn't it prove they didn't yet know what the hell they were doing or talking about? Also valuable and revealing proof.

Same thing can be done with CTE. But somehow or another it proves NOTHING when YOU or Dan White have to be at the table on video as you throw out the same lame excuse time and again.

You make too much sense.
 
lol

JB saying you make sense pretty much drops the odds that you do to zero.

pj
chgo

And you posting to JB with another one of your lame put down deflections and not responding directly to the post about videos because you have nothing of substance and no answer drops your credibility to BELOW ZERO.

But we all always knew that and the entire forum is realizing it if they already haven't.

Bearded Dragon Head PATRICK: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XA6vmeAtYUs

LMAO!!
 
Last edited:
lol

You don't think I know what videos can prove? Well, here's a video of a lizard!!!!!

Thanks for being perfectly, predictably you.

pj
chgo


But do you know what's even better than a video of a LIZARD??!!!

It would be YOU DESCRIBING YOUR HEAD MOVING LIKE A LIZARD!!! We have to use a video EXAMPLE of a LIZARD because you're too afraid of showing that you REALLY DO BOB LIKE THE LIZARD VIDEO!! THE WORDS IN YOUR OWN POST ARE PROOF!!

PAT JOHNSON POSTING ON RSB: ROTFLMAO!!!

Newsgroups: rec.sport.billiard
From: Patrick Johnson <REMOV...@21stcentury.net>

We've talked about this a few times. I prefer to sight down the
contact point-to-contact point line, but that puts my head in
different positions over the stick depending on the shot and can be
physically difficult for cue ball contact points "outside" the stick,
so I adjust it for comfort and consistency.

I also like to move my head back and forth to sight down more than one of the available lines, including cue ball path, just for cross reference

(I might look a little like a lizard doing this). . I like to know that my stick is
pointing where I want it to, but "sight down the stick" doesn't work
by itself for me.

Pat Johnson
Chi

ROTFLMFAO!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XA6vmeAtYUs

Thanks for being perfectly, predictably you and getting caught with your own words and lizard head bobbing around!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
 
Last edited:
And you posting to JB with another one of your lame put down deflections and not responding directly to the post about videos because you have nothing of substance and no answer drops your credibility to BELOW ZERO.

But we all always knew that and the entire forum is realizing it if they already haven't.

Bearded Dragon Head PATRICK: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XA6vmeAtYUs

LMAO!!

You do realize that you are you are including me by the phrasing used. Not a good thing to do cause I sure don't share the same sentiments about PJ as you do. I'm sure I'm not the only one.

And posting a person shooting style has what to do with credibility? I mean if a person says they do xyz and than they show a video that clearly, objectively shows that they are doing what they say, thats pretty credible.

Since there are videos of UFO, you must believe in alien life forms.
 
Except the words in my own post (that you apparently pulled from your personal archive of all my posts) are "back and forth".

lol

pj
chgo


WHEN YOU POSTED IT THIS WAY ON RSB, "(I might look a little like a lizard doing this"), IF IT LOOKS LIKE A LIZARD...ACTS LIKE A LIZARD...MOVES IT'S HEAD LIKE A LIZARD...IT'S A LIZARD!!!

I didn't post "Up and down", Up and down, Up and down". Now you're flat out lying and fabricating a post while acting more like a WEASEL.

I DON'T CARE IF IT'S MOVING IT'S HEAD UP AND DOWN, BACK AND FORTH, OR IN CIRCLES, IT'S A LIZARD JUST LIKE YOU DESCRIBED YOURSELF.
LMAO!!

(Google groups RSB archives) I'm not going to waste space on my computer with your drivel by storing anything.
 
Last edited:
You do realize that you are you are including me by the phrasing used. Not a good thing to do cause I sure don't share the same sentiments about PJ as you do. .

You shouldn't be concerned and I'll clarify it. I always have viewed you as a non-entity. One that isn't even counted in the population from an importance aspect.
 
I didn't post "Up and down", Up and down, Up and down". Now you're flat out lying and fabricating a post while acting more like a WEASEL.
Wow. I didn't think even you were this blatantly dishonest.

I cut and pasted those words from your post #52, which you edited to remove them. I'm sure I'm not the only one who saw them. Were they really so embarrassing that you need to outright lie about it?

lol - except it isn't really funny, is it?

pj
chgo
 
Wow. I didn't think even you were this blatantly dishonest.

I cut and pasted those words from your post #52, which you edited to remove them. I'm sure I'm not the only one who saw them. Were they really so embarrassing that you need to outright lie about it?

lol - except it isn't really funny, is it?

pj
chgo


I have no idea what you're talking about especially since you're the one who alters crap all the time to twist everything.

I guess you should have had a video. They prove everything. LMAO at how funny you can be at times.


ONE MORE TIME: IF IT LOOKS LIKE A LIZARD...ACTS LIKE A LIZARD...MOVES IT'S HEAD LIKE A LIZARD...IT'S A LIZARD!!!

I DON'T CARE IF IT'S MOVING IT'S HEAD UP AND DOWN, BACK AND FORTH, OR IN CIRCLES, IT'S A LIZARD JUST LIKE YOU DESCRIBED YOURSELF.
LMAO!!
 
Last edited:
I didn't post "Up and down", Up and down, Up and down". Now you're flat out lying and fabricating a post while acting more like a WEASEL.
Patrick Johnson:
Wow. I didn't think even you were this blatantly dishonest.

I cut and pasted those words from your post #52
SpiderWebComm:
I have no idea what you're talking about
So you didn't edit those words out of your post? On your so-called honor?

pj <- shoulda quoted the whole thing
chgo
 
So you didn't edit those words out of your post? On your so-called honor?

pj <- shoulda quoted the whole thing
chgo

So you have learned every aspect of CTE as Stan teaches it to be able to demonstrate on the table instead of the continuous bad mouthing? On your so-called honor?

You shoulda videoed the whole thing. (still not too late)

The video will prove everything because we'll know immediately based on your descriptions of the shot angle and alignments used for each shot. It won't matter whether the OB goes in or misses unless it misses badly. That will be even more telling. But we all know you don't have the nerve or confidence to be exposed on video.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top