That's what I thought. Neither the character to be honest nor the courage to see your dishonesty through.
pj
chgo
Discussing CTE with Stan Shuffett
- Thread starter Dan White
- Start date
pj
chgo
Same typical BS of red herrings or strawman arguments when you have nowhere else to go or trapped. This isn't the issue...
THIS IS:
So you have learned every aspect of CTE as Stan teaches it to be able to demonstrate on the table instead of the continuous bad mouthing? On your so-called honor?
You shoulda videoed the whole thing. (still not too late)
The video will prove everything because we'll know immediately based on your descriptions of the shot angle and alignments used for each shot. It won't matter whether the OB goes in or misses unless it misses badly. That will be even more telling. But we all know you don't have the nerve or confidence to be exposed on video.
So get that LIZARD HEAD MOVEMENT of yours rockin' and rollin' in any direction you find most helpful. Up and down...back and forth...in circles...whatever floats your boat.
Last edited:
Let's see who's trapped...
After lying about what you posted and calling me a "flat out lying weasel" for suggesting it, now it "isn't the issue"?
The issue is your utter lack of character and how readers should view the things you say. You edited your post, lied openly about it, and tried to divert blame onto me, as the quote and screen capture below prove (yes, others saw it too).
If lying is such a casual, everyday thing for you that you'll lie out of habit, publicly and repeatedly, about something so innocuous, how can we believe anything you say here?
And who's the real "weasel"?
pj
chgo
View attachment 53779
Attachments
Last edited:
ROTFLMAO!!! OF COURSE I DID THAT!! YOU KNOW IT, OTHERS WHO SAW MY ORIGINAL POST KNOW IT, AND I KNOW IT BECAUSE I DID IT ON PURPOSE TO MESS WITH YOUR PEA BRAIN SINCE YOU HAVE DONE THINGS LIKE THIS MANY TIMES OVER. I'M GLAD YOU FOUND IT SO I COULD HAVE A HEARTY LAUGH!! EVERYONE WHO KNOWS ME PERSONALLY ALSO KNOWS I'M A PRANKSTER! HAHAHAHAHAHA
What part of UP AND DOWN or BACK AND FORTH matters based on the WAY A LIZARD (YOU) MOVES IT'S HEAD?? NONE! IT'S A MEANINGLESS POINT!!
YOU'RE THE ONE WHO STATED THAT YOUR HEAD LOOKS LIKE A LIZARD AS YOU'RE SIGHTING THE SHOT!! LMAO!!
PAT JOHNSON STATED IN RSB: (I might look a little like a lizard doing this). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XA6vmeAtYUs
You continue to use RED HERRING DIVERSIONARY TACTICS as you always do
and THIS is a PRIME EXAMPLE! It's MEANINGLESS OTHER THAN I GOT YOUR GOAT!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
HERE'S THE REAL ISSUE ONCE AGAIN:
So you have learned every aspect of CTE as Stan teaches it to be able to demonstrate on the table instead of the continuous bad mouthing? On your so-called honor?
You shoulda videoed the whole thing. (still not too late)
The video will prove everything because we'll know immediately based on your descriptions of the shot angle and alignments used for each shot. It won't matter whether the OB goes in or misses unless it misses badly. That will be even more telling. But we all know you don't have the nerve or confidence to be exposed on video.
So get that LIZARD HEAD MOVEMENT of yours rockin' and rollin' in any direction you find most helpful. Up and down...back and forth...in circles...whatever floats your boat.
BTW, YOU'RE THE REAL WEASEL FOR NOT ADDRESSING THE ISSUE ABOVE BY JERKING AROUND WITH WHICH DIRECTION YOU MOVE YOUR HEAD LIKE A LIZARD!! YOU'VE BEEN WEASELING OUT OF DOING A VIDEO FOR 2 DECADES.
AS FAR AS CHARACTER GOES, YOU'VE VILIFIED HAL, STAN, CJ WILEY, HUNDREDS OF FORUM MEMBERS FOR THE SAME LENGTH OF TIME WITH NO CREDENTIALS TO SHOW FOR IT OTHER THAN A BIG MOUTH ON A COUPLE OF FORUMS. I HAVE NO IDEA HOW PEOPLE TAKE YOU SERIOUSLY.
What part of UP AND DOWN or BACK AND FORTH matters based on the WAY A LIZARD (YOU) MOVES IT'S HEAD?? NONE! IT'S A MEANINGLESS POINT!!
YOU'RE THE ONE WHO STATED THAT YOUR HEAD LOOKS LIKE A LIZARD AS YOU'RE SIGHTING THE SHOT!! LMAO!!
PAT JOHNSON STATED IN RSB: (I might look a little like a lizard doing this). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XA6vmeAtYUs
You continue to use RED HERRING DIVERSIONARY TACTICS as you always do
and THIS is a PRIME EXAMPLE! It's MEANINGLESS OTHER THAN I GOT YOUR GOAT!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
HERE'S THE REAL ISSUE ONCE AGAIN:
So you have learned every aspect of CTE as Stan teaches it to be able to demonstrate on the table instead of the continuous bad mouthing? On your so-called honor?
You shoulda videoed the whole thing. (still not too late)
The video will prove everything because we'll know immediately based on your descriptions of the shot angle and alignments used for each shot. It won't matter whether the OB goes in or misses unless it misses badly. That will be even more telling. But we all know you don't have the nerve or confidence to be exposed on video.
So get that LIZARD HEAD MOVEMENT of yours rockin' and rollin' in any direction you find most helpful. Up and down...back and forth...in circles...whatever floats your boat.
BTW, YOU'RE THE REAL WEASEL FOR NOT ADDRESSING THE ISSUE ABOVE BY JERKING AROUND WITH WHICH DIRECTION YOU MOVE YOUR HEAD LIKE A LIZARD!! YOU'VE BEEN WEASELING OUT OF DOING A VIDEO FOR 2 DECADES.
AS FAR AS CHARACTER GOES, YOU'VE VILIFIED HAL, STAN, CJ WILEY, HUNDREDS OF FORUM MEMBERS FOR THE SAME LENGTH OF TIME WITH NO CREDENTIALS TO SHOW FOR IT OTHER THAN A BIG MOUTH ON A COUPLE OF FORUMS. I HAVE NO IDEA HOW PEOPLE TAKE YOU SERIOUSLY.
Last edited:
Of course, he has not learned CTE PRO ONE because if he had he could have challenged the errors I made in DVD 1 and 2.....there are a few visuals that I missed that he could have nailed me on......but when one is deficient on debate subject matter, they place themselves in a position of weakness.
I have had a free ride to discover all of my errors over time and completely on my own.....even though the mistakes are very few in number, they will be listed in a single chapter in my book....
I am thrilled that he and others chose to not learn and dissect my work......
My work is perfected now to best it can ever be done on my part.
Stan Shuffett
Last edited:
Yeah, what else can you say when you're so obviously busted? Double down and seal the verdict on your utter lack of character.
Now we know you "personally" too.
pj <- knew him "personally" all along
chgo
Hey you gave it a shot. We cant say you didn't try.
Last edited:
Busted?? For what... A MEANINGLESS BULLSH*T PRANK regarding HEAD MOVEMENT LIKE A LIZARD?? LMAO!!
This is all you have to hang onto as your red herring in JOHNSON'S LAST STAND?
Your lack of character has been exposed for all to see for two decades in the archives of RSB as well as here on AZ archives of all your posts.
I know you personally too, a WEASEL who avoids REAL ISSUES by using anything available in diversionary debate techniques.
So, WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO DO A VIDEO? (more red herring, strawman diversionary tactics to be forthcoming by Pat Johnson)
Last edited:
You got that right! I am a doer. I know how to set goals and reach goals.
Any time you would to debate me at a table in front of some players and a general audience, be my guest.....you can see first-hand the fruits of real work....
It can be arranged! How about at book release so you can be the hero to take me down?
Stan Shuffett
In addition to Satori, maybe Pat Johnson, Dan White, 8pack, English, and a few others would like to join in for the action. There's strength in numbers, you know.
If they all put their collective knowledge together regarding how to use CTE, they might have a fighting chance.
Uhhhhhhh, I was just pranking again. NOPE!! THEY WOULD ALL BE WALKING OUT WITH THEIR TAILS AND TONGUES HANGING BETWEEN THEIR LEGS!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Stan, any way we can get a list of these, so I can better follow your DVDs?
Thanks
The 1 or 2 errors on DVD1 have already been noted At this point just play ALL of the shots on DVD2 just as stated and you will be fine........Of the 75 shots, there MAY be 2 or so that can determined as incorrect only because of new sighting info that occurs in full stance closer to the source of the shot....
Stan Shuffett
Videos of UFOs are analyzed and discussed for their content and origin.
That's why we call them UNIDENTIFIED objects.
Videos on CTE are dismissed by a small group here as not being proof enough of the effectiveness of the method - some like Duckie even go so far as to say it does not and can not work.
That's why we call them UNIDENTIFIED objects.
Videos on CTE are dismissed by a small group here as not being proof enough of the effectiveness of the method - some like Duckie even go so far as to say it does not and can not work.
Who cares? Let them be!
I mean why should we try to convince someone that does not want to believe?
Keep our energies for these that really want
I guess to you then when Bruce Lee said, "be like water" you would have told him to screw off for saying something that cannot be physically true.
GoldenFlash
Banned
Bet it up
Let it roll..............
Come on and get some. :wink:
I'm in for 500 at this little event with Stan as my horse.
Let it roll..............
Come on and get some. :wink:
GoldenFlash
Banned
Sometimes those who do not know that they do not know must be punished. :smile:Who cares? Let them be!
I mean why should we try to convince someone that does not want to believe?
Keep our energies for these that really want
Many understand and have Stans video's. How would any kind of debate prove anything.
The only thing we share with the system are the directions. This part isn't what troubles many.
Stan makes 5 different shots with the same lineup. It should be very clear all share the same relationship between them. The only difference is the angle to the pocket.
Would it be fair to say something should change for each shot to be made? Stan states his system is a center pocket system , no adjusting but yet he pulled off the 5 shots. Now if I were to do this, it wouldn't happen unless I adjusted after down or started out somewhere at the A but not really locking on any certain part until it looks right. The A may be closer to B then what it really is. And if this is happening, your somewhat guessing..not good for the system.
Stan making any shot with his system doesn't prove anything, is not about his skills as a player. Whats being questioned is how he can take the same directions for his system as we do, but yet a lot of us come to a different conclusion as he does and we've followed the directions to a t. I had the dvds any many more probably did to.
Cte isn't rocket science and its not hard to follow whats he's saying. Its seeing what he's seeing, just dont happen for me unless I adjust somewhere.
Yes I know, none of us have ever been properly trained with cte.
All I know is I spent an hour on my table with 4.25" pockets and CTE helps me aim to pocket balls cleanly on it. Anyone wants to get into a debate live with a pool table with Stan they can bet high because I will empty OUT if there is an independent panel of judges to determine the winner of the debate.
I don't care what the terminology is. I am convinced that Stan in person will EASILY prove whatever he asserts to be true concerning CTE.
Stan, this gives me an idea. Let's actually arrange to do this live and we will pick out every negative assertion that all these people have made. We don't really need them to be there since we have their words. There is nothing physical they can add to the debate anyway.
I don't care what the terminology is. I am convinced that Stan in person will EASILY prove whatever he asserts to be true concerning CTE.
Stan, this gives me an idea. Let's actually arrange to do this live and we will pick out every negative assertion that all these people have made. We don't really need them to be there since we have their words. There is nothing physical they can add to the debate anyway.