Some added perspective for my 5 shot video

You're probably a little smarter then you come off here,but I'm betting your still a big baby in real life....grow up would ya.:)

When it comes to the smartness department you aren't even close to being in the same league, Anthony.

If you want to bet, I think you're a big baby and total waste when it comes to posting what you actually do on the table and explaining it. Too bad because you are definitely a damn good shooter. Here it is again:

Since you're such a know it all Tony, why have you never posted a step by step process of how you aim and exactly what you're seeing to link up a shot. Don't you think that would be positive and beneficial or do you like playing the role of a dbag?

Or another possibility is stay the hell out of the threads if you think it's garbage. I guess it never occurred to you, huh? Do you also hang out in gay bars if you aren't gay or go to Islamic Mosques if you aren't Muslim like you do in CTE threads but hate CTE?

Be a MAN for a change instead of a little whining cry baby SISSY. POST UP or SHUT UP!

Anthony at his best:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qS7nqwGt4-I




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


*******************
 
Last edited:
Your new recruit, Dan "rabid dog" White is the one who foams at the mouth from anti-CTE rabies like you've done for two decades. He has some catching up to do.

Two things.

1. My join date on AZ predates yours and I spoke to Hal practically before AZ existed, so how does that make me the new guy?

2. Find one "rabid" post I've made, please. Do I have to resort to name calling, too, or can I continue to be an adult?
 
Everyone who gets involved in the aiming wars eventually becomes nuts. You're exponentially on a faster track to nuttiness than all of us right now. It's overtaking your life. I guess getting totally rejected by Stan was a biatch for your ego and a hard pill to swallow but you had it coming. He owes you nothing and probably should have done it sooner. Since then you continue to show your true colors and low class in every post.

"Nuts" is also a matter of perspective based on which side you're on, and there have always been sides since Hal Houle and Patrick Johnson made their first posts on RSB 18 years ago. You've chosen the side you're on so suck it up because if you want to keep posting your uneducated drivel about CTE or to badmouth Stan, expect to be laid to waste.

You've become Dan "Rabid Dog" White and you'll be treated as such.

Btw, since you're now an expert on CTE and think Stan is doing a lousy job of explaining it properly, why don't you just go ahead and explain it better since you are convinced that it works. (which it does) The floor is all yours.

Thanks for the floor. You take surprising leaps in logic, which may also explain your dogged defense of an aiming method that nobody understands. That's not a dig, it's just a fact. None of the users of CTE understand how exactly it works, yet at the same time they are convinced that it is a completely objective system that requires no subconscious adjustment in order to pocket a ball. So where was I? Oh, yeah, I am not "convinced that it works," as you say. I am open to the idea that it works for some people, but the reason it works is a mystery. It definitely doesn't work the way it has typically been taught.

You have a habit of telling people to stay out of the discussion in this discussion forum. You might want to direct that toward Stan. He is the one who posts here and even starts his own thread. Why does he do that? If, as you say, he merely wants to transmit information to his students, why doesn't he use his website or blog, or email blast like Max Eberle does? The answer is that he uses this forum as a marketing tool. So as long as he posts information and entertains questions from people, everybody is welcome to comment. The problem Stan has is that every once in awhile somebody comes along and wants an actual answer to a question. That's when all hell breaks loose!
 
Thanks for the floor. You take surprising leaps in logic, which may also explain your dogged defense of an aiming method that nobody understands. That's not a dig, it's just a fact. None of the users of CTE understand how exactly it works, yet at the same time they are convinced that it is a completely objective system that requires no subconscious adjustment in order to pocket a ball. So where was I? Oh, yeah, I am not "convinced that it works," as you say. I am open to the idea that it works for some people, but the reason it works is a mystery. It definitely doesn't work the way it has typically been taught.

You have a habit of telling people to stay out of the discussion in this discussion forum. You might want to direct that toward Stan. He is the one who posts here and even starts his own thread. Why does he do that? If, as you say, he merely wants to transmit information to his students, why doesn't he use his website or blog, or email blast like Max Eberle does? The answer is that he uses this forum as a marketing tool. So as long as he posts information and entertains questions from people, everybody is welcome to comment. The problem Stan has is that every once in awhile somebody comes along and wants an actual answer to a question. That's when all hell breaks loose!

:thumbup2::thumbup2::thumbup2:
 
When it comes to the smartness department you aren't even close to being in the same league, Anthony.

If you want to bet, I think you're a big baby and total waste when it comes to posting what you actually do on the table and explaining it. Too bad because you are definitely a damn good shooter. Here it is again:

Since you're such a know it all Tony, why have you never posted a step by step process of how you aim and exactly what you're seeing to link up a shot. Don't you think that would be positive and beneficial or do you like playing the role of a dbag?

Or another possibility is stay the hell out of the threads if you think it's garbage. I guess it never occurred to you, huh? Do you also hang out in gay bars if you aren't gay or go to Islamic Mosques if you aren't Muslim like you do in CTE threads but hate CTE?

Be a MAN for a change instead of a little whining cry baby SISSY. POST UP or SHUT UP!

Anthony at his best:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qS7nqwGt4-I




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


*******************

I still like you Dave , I think cte has made some of you go off tilt.;)

I'm going to label you big baby Davie until you apologize for the way you've been treating people....not to cool.

You do come up with some funny sh!t though.:) Makes me wanna say some bad sh!t to ya just to see what you write,:D
 
Two things.

1. My join date on AZ predates yours and I spoke to Hal practically before AZ existed, so how does that make me the new guy?

2. Find one "rabid" post I've made, please. Do I have to resort to name calling, too, or can I continue to be an adult?

1. Your join date on RSB also predates mine because I didn't know it existed and never was a member there. However from what I've gleaned in the archives of both places you never did partake in any of the aiming wars to either discuss or assault those who taught and used CTE and other pivot based systems of Hal. You're new to being like your long time cronies, Pat Johnson and Lou Figueroa when it comes to living, breathing, and attacking as they have for almost 2 decades.

Don't you find it the least bit odd and somewhat sick to continue it on a daily basis for that many years of one's life?

2. Now I know you're out of your ever loving mind about this subject and your actions.
 
Thanks for the floor. You take surprising leaps in logic, which may also explain your dogged defense of an aiming method that nobody understands. That's not a dig, it's just a fact. None of the users of CTE understand how exactly it works, yet at the same time they are convinced that it is a completely objective system that requires no subconscious adjustment in order to pocket a ball. So where was I? Oh, yeah, I am not "convinced that it works," as you say. I am open to the idea that it works for some people, but the reason it works is a mystery. It definitely doesn't work the way it has typically been taught.

You have the floor so take advantage of it. Explain where the breakdown occurs and why it doesn't work the way it's being taught. When and where during the visual and body alignment process could you teach it better and how would you phrase it to be more effective for learning?

You have a habit of telling people to stay out of the discussion in this discussion forum. You might want to direct that toward Stan. He is the one who posts here and even starts his own thread. Why does he do that? If, as you say, he merely wants to transmit information to his students, why doesn't he use his website or blog, or email blast like Max Eberle does? The answer is that he uses this forum as a marketing tool. So as long as he posts information and entertains questions from people, everybody is welcome to comment. The problem Stan has is that every once in awhile somebody comes along and wants an actual answer to a question. That's when all hell breaks loose!

You're saying Stan has no right to post here about something that can help individuals play pool more effectively because YOU don't like the way it's being taught or bogus? He should go elsewhere?! When did AZ create a censorship department and place you in charge of determining what's beneficial, what's not, how it should be taught, and if it belongs elsewhere on the internet instead of here? Man, you really have some brass balls.

Stan has gotten sick and tired of the assaults on him personally which you, Dan
"rabid dog" White revel in doing as part of your ongoing onslaught. At the same time he's made an enormous number of videos POSTED ON YOUTUBE (not here) addressing those specific questions asked by sane and respectful students of CTE.

That goes far beyond the call of duty than just trying to put it into words in a brief post.

You aren't interested in learning what he has to offer because if that was the case you would have at least invested in the DVDs a long time ago when they came out and then taken it to the table. Now you're nothing more than a regular antagonist.

That's where we differ because unlike you, a cheap miserly mooch who expects free handouts and answers over the internet, I got off my butt immediately when Hal moved to my state of PA and got multiple lessons from him directly on the table at his house. Afterwards when his health was failing rapidly, I went to Kentucky to get personal lessons from Stan. If you want something badly enough you go after it and I did. Obviously you could care less other than to cry and whine about it here on the forum and expect your demands be catered to after your low class, no class personal attacks on Stan. Those brass balls continue to grow even larger.
 
Last edited:
I still like you Dave , I think cte has made ME go off tilt.;)

I've noticed the same thing about you Anthony.

I'm going to label you big baby Davie until you apologize for the way you've been treating people....not to cool.

You apologize first for your actions and words. Don't use my lines or youtube videos since I've already labeled you as big cry baby Anthony. Be creative.

You can also help by getting on the table to do some videos explaining how you aim and what you're seeing. I know you aren't a chickensh!t like Pat Johnson because you've posted videos in the past which were pretty sporty. I have no idea why you're suddenly clamping up when you probably have a lot to offer. What's the deal?


You do come up with some funny sh!t though.:) Makes me wanna say some bad sh!t to ya just to see what you write,:D

Be my guest then we can both get banned. (I'll bet my stuff will be funnier than yours) :cool::cool:
 
You've never believed in God or Jesus before but suddenly you've found religion.

Take your own advice and get a life outside of pool forums. You've already pi$$ed away 18 years over CTE, how many more are you shooting for?

When an amazing pro player like yourself uses curtains, is it a requirement that you flip out over questions of what references you use to aim or is that up to the individual?
 
So an awesome pro player like you that has been spamming this subject for years can't say what references are used on a blind shot?
 
Blind Shots

Most banks and lots of back cuts are "blind" shots. I think our mental "map" of the table is more developed, and more involved, than we realize.

pj
chgo
 
Back
Top