The logo says 513It is silver and looks like a coin! One letter is b can't remember the other!
Kd
Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk
The logo says 513It is silver and looks like a coin! One letter is b can't remember the other!
Kd
Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk
Thank you!The logo says 513
Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk
Rooster do you want full disclosure???
How was your experience buying the "TWO" bocote cues??? Why did you omit that you own two of his cues and were the owner of the last two cues made???
Additionally, you omitted the reason for the delay? The buyer modified the cue design jog your memory? What was the modification to the design? White phenolic rings instead of black jog your mind? What happened when "White phenolic rings were used instead of what Bernie recommended? I will tell you! The tenon cracked because it was a "Much" weaker material and the buyer insisted despite Bernards warnings? Did bernard tell the buyer what happened? Yes he did! He repaired the tenon and switched the phenolic to Ivory at much added expense. The buyer then said "well" i don't want it since the tenon cracked and you had to repair it!!!
He was 2 weeks away from finish! He received 2 checks! One for $600 as the deposit! Another check for $1500! He returned $1200 which was minus the $300 for the ivory he had to upgrade to for structural reason and buyer aesthics!
Does any of this sound familiar! He offered to redo the cue and "start again" as you said.
I understand this may be a family member or close friend of yours involved in this dispute! But, you attacking and "OMITTING" vital details to paint Bernard as some kind of villain is not a good look.
I asked you several VITAL questions and they still remain unanswered in my last post and I wonder why unanswered??? Because, the answer is that the reason for the return was 100% because the weak material requested resulted in the tenon to crack and despite being structurally sound and repaired the buyer could not get over it! Thus, the screams for a refund! Nothing to do with building the cue or delays on his part as they are a direct result of the changes requested by the buyer!
KD
Are you sure you aren't Bernie? You know way too much. Why are you asking questions when you already know all of the answers. Every bit of info you posted in this post came from you and Only you. No one else mentioned anything of the sorts.
Did you talk to him today?
very close! You saw me the second month of the one pocket monthly tournament up in baltimore!!!KD is not Bernie, KD and his family Iso well known out here , just ask JAM. I do not know hi personally but I think his name is Mark or something like that.
Rooster do you want full disclosure???
How was your experience buying the "TWO" bocote cues??? Why did you omit that you own two of his cues and were the owner of the last two cues made???
Additionally, you omitted the reason for the delay? The buyer modified the cue design jog your memory? What was the modification to the design? White phenolic rings instead of black jog your mind? What happened when "White phenolic rings were used instead of what Bernie recommended? I will tell you! The tenon cracked because it was a "Much" weaker material and the buyer insisted despite Bernards warnings? Did bernard tell the buyer what happened? Yes he did! He repaired the tenon and switched the phenolic to Ivory at much added expense. The buyer then said "well" i don't want it since the tenon cracked and you had to repair it!!!
He was 2 weeks away from finish! He received 2 checks! One for $600 as the deposit! Another check for $1500! He returned $1200 which was minus the $300 for the ivory he had to upgrade to for structural reason and buyer aesthics!
Does any of this sound familiar! He offered to redo the cue and "start again" as you said.
I understand this may be a family member or close friend of yours involved in this dispute! But, you attacking and "OMITTING" vital details to paint Bernard as some kind of villain is not a good look.
I asked you several VITAL questions and they still remain unanswered in my last post and I wonder why unanswered??? Because, the answer is that the reason for the return was 100% because the weak material requested resulted in the tenon to crack and despite being structurally sound and repaired the buyer could not get over it! Thus, the screams for a refund! Nothing to do with building the cue or delays on his part as they are a direct result of the changes requested by the buyer!
KD
very close! You saw me the second month of the one pocket monthly tournament up in baltimore!!!
mike
KD is not Bernie, KD and his family Iso well known out here , just ask JAM. I do not know hi personally but I think his name is Mark or something like that.
Well your close its Mike ,, and yes Jam knows him and his Dad,, and trust me Jam is family to them and would never question thier integrity ever !!
1
That's your response!We can go back and forth with he said/ she said but the bottom line is the buyer wasn't happy for whatever reason. Bernie agreed to give a Full Refund and didn't.
Agreed, please drop the mic on your way outThat's your response!
How repulsive!
Attack a persons lively hood and omit major key points and distort the reality of the situation and most here would think you would refute my post publicly or apologize!
Just do neither and reiterate the same nonsense!
I am done! Azbilliards know the Truth.
Kd
Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk
That's your response!
How repulsive!
Attack a persons lively hood and omit major key points and distort the reality of the situation and most here would think you would refute my post publicly or apologize!
Just do neither and reiterate the same nonsense!
I am done! Azbilliards know the Truth.
Kd
Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk