And the elephant huggers strike again.
And the elephant huggers strike again.
It may not be the end of using ivory, but it should be. We have wiped out 1/2 of all the animals on earth since 1970. It won`t be long and there will be no elephants left. It is absolutely shameful.
I have no issue with using animals for a purpose. I eat meat. I have leather jackets and belts. And leather shoes. And leather cue tips. Etc. However, where I have a problem is killing an animal for the purpose of show, or as a prize. And also, not using the animal in its entirety. Feeding the general population, or clothing them is different than wanting a pretty white material in your cue. Two are necessity. One is luxury.
If elephants were treated as livestock, and were abundant, I would still have a problem with them being slaughtered purely for ivory. Now, if we were eating the animal, using the hides, and completely using the animal, sure - take the tusks, because it wasn't a senseless slaughtering. But when you see elephants just left butchered, and only the tusks have been removed, you know why that elephant died. It wasn't due to urban sprawl.
I absolutely agree, which is why the actual poaching has to be stopped.
But the poaching doesn't happen here. It happens over there.
I don't even have a problem with our government enacting ivory control laws, I think it's a good idea, but let's be realistic, "curbing" the demand in the states, even if successful, will not change what happens in Africa or Asia or anywhere else for that matter.
As I said before, if the law enforcement agencies of this country want to REALLY save elephant lives, they shouldn't be chasing body parts after the fact. They should organize squads of armed vehicles, troops and aircraft, go spend 10 years in Africa blowing poachers apart with remote drones and satellites, and I'd be willing to bet that the poaching numbers go way down.![]()
And the elephant huggers strike again.
I have to admit, I've found your contributions to other pool-related threads to be very interesting and knowledgeable.
But your posts on these Ivory threads don't reflect well on you.
There is an issue (facing other species and other materials as well) of sentient creatures being killed, and species driven to extinction, for no good reason. So that a few people can have their body parts as a needless accessory.
Your posts so far are saying "Yeah I know, and who gives a s***." Which is at least honest, but it doesn't reflect particularly well on your thought process, or ethics.
The issue here is no longer the elephants.
It's the threads that have ivory in them turning into flame wars .
The subject of this thread is all lost now because of the flame wars.
The subject was the feasibility of making cues outside where ivory is legal.
Too bad Ernie can't take his ivory outside to make cues .
While one cue maker in China can make cues with ivory that are nowhere as old as what Ernie had .
Oh, I did contribute to this thread.
And it was valuable. Ivory cannot be turned fast. They crack.
So, a maker making cues outside of his shop is going to be flying a lot .
Let's say Ernie makes an ivory handled cue in China.
He turns it round. Let's it sit. Is he gonna sit in China for months till the next time it needs a MM pass ?
Meanwhile, did all the anti or pro ivory say anything that really addresses the SUBJECT of this thread ????
Oh, I don't use ivory all that much.
Just in case I get accused of being an ivory merchant or something .
I have plenty of stags.