I have seen this question before, I think it was ruled legal, look at rule "C".per the rules the cue stick is not being used as it is intended
so not legal
...
....
1.3 Player’s Use of Equipment
The equipment must meet existing WPA equipment specifications.* In general, players are not permitted to introduce novel equipment into the game. The following uses, among others, are considered normal. If the player is uncertain about a particular use of equipment, he should discuss it with the tournament management prior to the start of play.* The equipment must be used only for the purpose or in the manner that the equipment was intended. (See 6.17 Unsportsmanlike Conduct.)
(a) Cue Stick – The player is permitted to switch between cue sticks during the match, such as break, jump and normal cues. He may use either a built-in extender or an add-on extender to increase the length of the stick.
(b) Chalk – The player may apply chalk to his tip to prevent miscues, and may use his own chalk, provided its color is compatible with the cloth.
(c) Mechanical Bridges – The player may use up to two mechanical bridges to support the cue stick during the shot. The configuration of the bridges is up to the player. He may use his own bridge if it is similar to standard bridges.
(d) Gloves – The player may use gloves to improve the grip and/or bridge hand function.*
(e) Powder – A player is allowed to use powder in a reasonable amount as determined by the referee.
*
I think its a perfectly legal manner in which to use a bridge - or even 8 of them at the same time... a Bridge is intended to be used to aid the player in gainful purchase on a shot. Legal.... I've actually used that in a Tournament with no problem. It's not the kind of thing that pops up very often.
Lesh
Nope, not legal. You can stack two bridge heads, I think there is a limit of two, you can't stack 3.
The picture in the OP shows only two bridges and one pool cue being used, so........
Now it only depends on WHICH set of rules you are playing under. :shrug:
Maniac
Two bridges with the bridgeheads stacked, not crossed like this. There was a question about this same type of setup (probably more than once) before.
This is good
![]()
I would be calling a referee over for sure, because the pool cue being rested across the table is not being used as intended.
Look at the rule (part C) written in post #19.
Like I said....depends on which set of rules you are using.
Maniac
I once saw Corey Deuel use a mechanical bridge for BREAKING in a fairly big tournament (not a major). Why was THIS allowed??? Obviously the bridge was NOT being used as intended.
Like I've stated twice before in this thread....depends on what rules you're playing under.
Maniac
The bridge head is used as a replacement of your hand, in a break shot it's still a replacement of your hand, and is on the bed of the table or on the rail like your hand would be, but the cue shaft is still supported by the bridge head, not being used across the table and supported in the middle of it.
I saw Corey do that in a Seminole tour stop at Snookers a few years ago, was strange LOL
I think you have top ask yourself just what the intended use for a bridge, and if you put a
mechanical bridge head on a cue or if a bridge is supplied as a part of the table equipment
when does a pool cue become a bridge and stop being a cue stick.
I would submit that a cue with a bridge head is no longer a cue and in it from (with a
bridge head) it cannot be used as a cue stick, and thus is a bridge, or a part of the bridge.
Mechanical bridges have begun to come in many forms, most recently and very popular is the telescoping bridge.
The telescoping handle - also a part of the bridge. I say it's part of the bridge because they cannot function independently as a bridge.
So what you call a "cue shaft" is actually a "Bridge shaft".....
It's all in your perspective
I don't think you understood my post, someone said something about intended use of the bridge, it's to replace your bridge hand. So if you use it to support something other than a cue (outside of the stacking of two bridges together using the same bridge head), you are not using it as it was intended. Such as laying an object across the handle. I was not saying the cue shaft holding a bridge head is a cue or anything, just that the bridge head's purpose is to hold the cue shaft in place of your hand.
I would be calling a referee over for sure, because the pool cue being rested across the table is not being used as intended.
This is as ridiculous as Oscar Dominguez' placing of the hand on top of the bridge head to get an elevated bridge.
If it was a social thing it'd be different but at a tournament, then it is my opinion that the players have to be prepared in every way possible - including having different rest heads. I have a bat rest, a London bridge (aka Rabbit bridge) and an EZ-Jump rest head.