We certainly want to make users aware of bad seeds like that, but we do stop short of banning them. If we ban them, then they just come back with another username, and no one knows about the old username.
What would be ideal, would be a list with First Name, Last Name, City and State. That way when someone is making a deal, they can check then the user gives them the shipping info. I know there are ways around even that, but I don't know how else to handle it.
Thoughts? Suggestions?
Agree, and it's a difficult conundrum.
However, claims of dishonesty require sufficient evidence.. I have no doubt that not all cue sales are genuine, but specificity is important. If you think a cue is not genuine, you have to start with:
- The ferrule. Is it not the ferrule that the original maker used, and why? Some old cuemakers used some pretty common materials, such as Lucite and good old white fiber. Don't be put off just by that, if it's not ivory.
- The joint rings. These are important. There were days when jet black bakelite was the material, then the more checked phenolic rings came into vogue. If you know the time period, it may be genuine, or not.
- The brass insert. It gives a lot away. The shape of it means everything, from Rambow, to Palmer, to Paradise, to Balabushka, and others. The wood tenon, same thing.
- The points and veneers. How long they are in the forearm, and the colors. Also, the spacing at the wrap. The method of indexing inlays inside the points. The experts know what to look for.
- The wrap. Very important, and harder to identify than anyone thinks. If you think it's Cortland, think again. It may or may not be.
- The butt sleeve. Length is important, but can be duplicated.
- The bumper. If original, it should be apparent. If newer, it should also be apparent, even if a similar color.
- The finish. You'd better be able to tell a lacquer finish from a modern two-part finish, if you're examining a cue for originality.
- Measurements at various sections of the butt.
The OP is correct, but you'd better be able to cover a lot of the above with a claim that something is not right. And, I've only gone over about 60% or so.
All the best,
WW