Originally Posted by jimmyg View Post
Since I have no personal or even second hand knowledge about the event, I'm only speculating based on logic and reason.
Considering the publicly stated concerns of the individuals involved, one would have to presume that cell phones and cameras would have been banned from the event. That would leave only detailed information and personal opinions concerning the actual event; attendance, commentary, value, etc, to be the restrictions contained in the non-disclosure agreement.
If that is true, and I have no knowledge that it is, one would have to consider that the motives of such an agreement were to prevent the attendees from publicly criticizing any component of the event, including content. Naturally, there is no logical reason one would want to prevent or restrict praise.
Considering that "opening night" events, whether theater, movies, books, circuses, shows and events of any and all natures, that intend on continued events, depend upon positive reviews and have/would never do such a thing, I also find this very strange. JMHO.
Something to consider...or not:
Plato, Mickey Mantle, Charles Dickens, Paul Newman, all the greats, did not become great by hiding their accomplishments and skills from the public and declaring themselves "great", they first revealed those accomplishments and skills to the public and then allowed the public to make them great.