dquarasr
Registered
I could use some help. I am trying to apply Mark Wilson’s chapters 3-6. His orthodox approach appeals very strongly to how I learn. I suppose it's time to open up to criticism here.
Historically, the impact point on the CB is right of intended. Mark’s alignment, stance, and elbow position have improved this dramatically. I have had to raise my elbow considerably compared to what I have been doing historically. And it has indeed resulted in reduction of my tendency to drop my elbow and swing it away from my body, which has mostly cured my impact point going right.
I understand it’s premature for me to be worried about it, but I have been trying to apply draw on a straight-in shot. Mark’s orthodoxy is helping. But, I am perplexed.
Please refer to the photos. EDIT: OK, they didn't load in this order, but the attachment file names are descriptive. Below shows the chronology:
1 – Addressing the CB on my last practice stroke. The tip would ostensibly contact the CB slightly above the lowest draw point, which is how it looks from my stance. Note my elbow position.
2 – The actual stroke, just prior to impact.
3 – The actual stroke, at impact.
4 – The CB showing the actual impact point significantly higher than intended point. You can see the red chalk mark well above the contact circle's bottom boundary. I believe my elbow is pretty close to where I start.
5 – The tip of the cue after the shot.
This shot resulted in a miscue. I cannot understand why this resulted in a miscue when the CB was struck well above the lowest allowable point, per Jim Rempe’s training CB.
This is an Adams cue of unknown vintage, with a Medium hardness tip, don’t know the brand but was installed by a knowledgeable technician at my local hall.
Any insights on why I am getting miscues is appreciated. Also, even though I am aiming quite low on the CB, my typical impact point is higher than intended, and when it does not miscue, I the CB is barely spinning backwards on a shot with CB three diamonds from OB on a 9-ft table. Insights as why the impact point is higher than on practice strokes would also be appreciated.
Historically, the impact point on the CB is right of intended. Mark’s alignment, stance, and elbow position have improved this dramatically. I have had to raise my elbow considerably compared to what I have been doing historically. And it has indeed resulted in reduction of my tendency to drop my elbow and swing it away from my body, which has mostly cured my impact point going right.
I understand it’s premature for me to be worried about it, but I have been trying to apply draw on a straight-in shot. Mark’s orthodoxy is helping. But, I am perplexed.
Please refer to the photos. EDIT: OK, they didn't load in this order, but the attachment file names are descriptive. Below shows the chronology:
1 – Addressing the CB on my last practice stroke. The tip would ostensibly contact the CB slightly above the lowest draw point, which is how it looks from my stance. Note my elbow position.
2 – The actual stroke, just prior to impact.
3 – The actual stroke, at impact.
4 – The CB showing the actual impact point significantly higher than intended point. You can see the red chalk mark well above the contact circle's bottom boundary. I believe my elbow is pretty close to where I start.
5 – The tip of the cue after the shot.
This shot resulted in a miscue. I cannot understand why this resulted in a miscue when the CB was struck well above the lowest allowable point, per Jim Rempe’s training CB.
This is an Adams cue of unknown vintage, with a Medium hardness tip, don’t know the brand but was installed by a knowledgeable technician at my local hall.
Any insights on why I am getting miscues is appreciated. Also, even though I am aiming quite low on the CB, my typical impact point is higher than intended, and when it does not miscue, I the CB is barely spinning backwards on a shot with CB three diamonds from OB on a 9-ft table. Insights as why the impact point is higher than on practice strokes would also be appreciated.