Current Best 14.1 Players

So few people even play it today it's really to bad. I was practicing one night in Raleigh 15 or so years ago and a local girl came up and asked what game it was. She had never heard of straight pool before. So she joined me for a couple hours and I gave her some 'free' lessons. It was all good and we had fun.

George Fels loved the game but would not play with anyone. He would come into Chris's and take a table and shoot straight pool all alone. I can't count he times I asked him to play and he politely declined every single time.. Never knew why but it was what it was. RIP George!

Back in the sixties when I was a teenager we would play for table time, at a penny a minute per player. I hated to lose that money I earned from my newspaper route paying for another guys time. That was how I learned to play straight pool..
He probably liked to play 14.1 alone because his time was limited and he did not want to spend half of it playing 14.1 safeties in order to play the game correctly in competition. I can fully understand that. Playing 14.1 alone is almost never boring to those who love the game- the constant challenge to figure out the puzzle of each rack is what keeps folks who love the game deeply interested. Playing 14.1 for many is just a great form of relaxation and "getting away from it all" - I would imagine he looked at it that way as well. No need for him to give free advice to those who could not play it well, or sit there while pros were running high numbers on him constantly.
 
He probably liked to play 14.1 alone because his time was limited and he did not want to spend half of it playing 14.1 safeties in order to play the game correctly in competition. I can fully understand that. Playing 14.1 alone is almost never boring to those who love the game- the constant challenge to figure out the puzzle of each rack is what keeps folks who love the game deeply interested. Playing 14.1 for many is just a great form of relaxation and "getting away from it all" - I would imagine he looked at it that way as well. No need for him to give free advice to those who could not play it well, or sit there while pros were running high numbers on him constantly.
Could be. It was not just me he would not play anyone. I never took it personally all of the regulars understood he liked to play alone. I like to practice straight alone as well
It helps my 8 ball game a lot..
 
Could be. It was not just me he would not play anyone. I never took it personally all of the regulars understood he liked to play alone. I like to practice straight alone as well
It helps my 8 ball game a lot..
As opposed to every other pool game where it’s always more fun to play someone, I also prefer to play/practice 14.1 by myself. Even though I’ve play the game for 50 years, I still feel like I’m always learning when I’m practicing 14.1 by myself, particularly break shots. When you’re playing someone in 14.1, for a relatively conservative player like me, too much time is wasted playing safeties.
 
But the WPA didn't exist until 1987, and North America (BCA) didn't join it until 1990. Their first world event was in 1990 (9-Ball), with Earl winning.
Yes, of course you are right here.

... but the BCA played a similar role back in the day as the WPA plays today as pro pool hadn't really gone global yet. At the elite pro level, World pool and American pool were practically one of the same until the mid-1980's, and almost no significant pool tournaments were played outside of the US. As you know, even the globalization of the game happened on US soil in the form of the PBT, the first truly international nine ball tour, later known as the Camel Tour, which brought the top Europeans and Asians into the competitive mainstream.

So, while what you say is correct, world championships pre-1990 had the highest possible level of sanctioning available in the sport at the time and always drew fields that justified their being called world championships.. I'd say that those who consider Johnston City 14.1 titles to be World Championships use similar logic, but I don't think those events had BCA sanctioning. In fact, the World 14.1 Championship fields of the 1970's were much tougher than what you had to negotiate in the 1990's, as winning the title in the 1970s typically meant having to outshine hall of famers like Steve Mizerak, Mike Sigel, Nick Varner, Dallas West, Allen Hopkins, Irving Crane, Lou Butera, Jim Rempe, Danny DiLiberto, Ray Martin, Luther Lassiter, Jimmy Moore and Joe Balsis,

Perhaps one should differentiate by calling some of the pre-WPA events that were world championships as having been "fully sanctioned" world championships.

Thanks for your post. Much as I hate to say it, the good old days are increasingly becoming a blur for me.
 
Last edited:
... For example, if I'm remembering correctly, all the PPPA World Championships (1976-1983 and also 1986) had BCA sanctioning. ....
Stu, as I remember it, completely the opposite was true. The PPPA formed and had its 1976 tournament (their first one, in Asbury Park, NJ) because they were dissatisfied with the BCA US Open 14.1 prize fund -- $35,000. The PPPA members boycotted the US Open. I think later on the PPPA events were included in the BCA records but that may have been after the PPPA ceased to exist.

(On a side note, the prize fund for the 1977 PPPA tournament was advertised as $50,000. In fact the prize fund was just the entry fees and amounted to $17,000.)
 
Earl turned out to be a much better straight pool player than anybody gave him credit for.
All the aforementioned players are all formidable straight pool players, hard to pick a winner.
 
Stu, as I remember it, completely the opposite was true. The PPPA formed and had its 1976 tournament (their first one, in Asbury Park, NJ) because they were dissatisfied with the BCA US Open 14.1 prize fund -- $35,000. The PPPA members boycotted the US Open. I think later on the PPPA events were included in the BCA records but that may have been after the PPPA ceased to exist.
Yup, that's how I remember it, too. Although I was just 18 years old at the time, I remember the boycott well and also how it led to the formation of the PPPA, I also think you're right that the sanctioning of their World 14.1 Championship came well after the fact.

I'm sure you'll also recall that the boycott in 1976 (which included most of the big names, with Steve Mizerak and Ray Martin among the leaders) led to the crowning of a true Cinderella at the US Open 14.1, with the winner being a college math professor from New Jersey named Tom Jennings.

Those were interesting times for sure. Yes, the straight pool era had its controversies, too.
 
George Fels loved the game but would not play with anyone. He would come into Chris's and take a table and shoot straight pool all alone. I can't count he times I asked him to play and he politely declined every single time.. Never knew why but it was what it was. RIP George!
George also had a home table for many years, and I've always loved his supremely on target, published comment in that regard:

"Nothing in the world beats the sheer pleasure of running racks of Straight Pool . . . . playing barefoot, in your underwear, at 2 o'clock in the morning."

Been there, done that. Characteristically, and with his ad-man background showing, George beautifully captured the imagery and feeling of an experience that many of us know so well.

Arnaldo
 
Yup, that's how I remember it, too. Although I was just 18 years old at the time, I remember the boycott well and also how it led to the formation of the PPPA, I also think you're right that the sanctioning of their World 14.1 Championship came well after the fact.

I'm sure you'll also recall that the boycott in 1976 (which included most of the big names, with Steve Mizerak and Ray Martin among the leaders) led to the crowning of a true Cinderella at the US Open 14.1, with the winner being a college math professor from New Jersey named Tom Jennings.

Those were interesting times for sure. Yes, the straight pool era had its controversies, too.
..which led to a challenge match between Larry Lisciotti (the newly crowned Prince of Pool) and Tom Jennings.

 
Last edited:
The obvious answer is Hohmann, who is by far, the best straight pooler of this generation of players, but it wouldn't surprise me at all if Dennis Orcullo were to win it. At the last 14.1 challenge at Derby City, Dennis ran a 260 on a 4 1/4" pocket table. Even though Filler won the high run prize in that event with a 285, Josh made his run on a 4 1/2" pocket table, and I'd argue that Dennis' run was the better of the two.

Certainly, several others would have to reckoned with, and Filler, Chinakhov, Feijen, and Schmidt are the most obvious contenders, but my sense of things is that it would come down to Hohmann or Orcullo. The gradually increasing pedigree of Orcullo over the years at 14.1 is undeniable.

My pick is Orcullo.
You dismissed John Schmidt pretty quickly. I would take John, especially if they play to 200+ points. I don't know how the tourney is played, but I think John is 1 of the favorites , especially if he takes a month or 2 to practice .
 
You dismissed John Schmidt pretty quickly. I would take John, especially if they play to 200+ points. I don't know how the tourney is played, but I think John is 1 of the favorites , especially if he takes a month or 2 to practice .
You may need to reread my post. I listed six major contenders, and John was one of them. Of course he's dangerous! He's just not my pick to win it. You may favor him , and that's your every right.
 
Last edited:
..which led to a challenge match between Larry Lisciotti (the newly crowned Prince of Pool) and Tom Jennings.

Wow, what a cool article. I never knew this match took place. Thanks for sharing.
 
You dismissed John Schmidt pretty quickly. I would take John, especially if they play to 200+ points. I don't know how the tourney is played, but I think John is 1 of the favorites , especially if he takes a month or 2 to practice .
As far as just running balls in practice JS is the best of this era. In matches however, there's a bunch of people favored over him.
 
As far as just running balls in practice JS is the best of this era. In matches however, there's a bunch of people favored over him.
I would agree with this, too. JS has not been the big force in competitive 14.1 that folks expected, until he proves differently, his legacy in 14.1 is mostly as a practice player - runs tons of balls in practice- like a Michael Eufemia did many years ago.
 
As opposed to every other pool game where it’s always more fun to play someone, I also prefer to play/practice 14.1 by myself. Even though I’ve play the game for 50 years, I still feel like I’m always learning when I’m practicing 14.1 by myself, particularly break shots. When you’re playing someone in 14.1, for a relatively conservative player like me, too much time is wasted playing safeties.
Yes, agree, the other problem is folks who like conversation, more than pool- we all know those folks- and in 14.1 you need a ton of concentration to make the right moves- idle chatter is not welcome when I am trying to get through tough racks:)
 
Wow, what a cool article. I never knew this match took place. Thanks for sharing.
This is really Lisciotti’s claim to fame, and the article was mainstream. When they did the article, they called him “the prince of pool,” so it became his nickname even though he already had one:

“Oil Can” Larry Lisciotti - The Prince of Pool.
 
This jumped out at me from the sports illustrated article,

"A 100-ball run is nowhere near Willie Mosconi's BCA record of 526—an accomplishment so astounding that few players today believe that he did it."

That sounds familiar, lol.
 
Back
Top