I don’t understand the “trolling”....it’s a good question, IMO
I believe he meant Danny bait.
I don’t understand the “trolling”....it’s a good question, IMO
He probably liked to play 14.1 alone because his time was limited and he did not want to spend half of it playing 14.1 safeties in order to play the game correctly in competition. I can fully understand that. Playing 14.1 alone is almost never boring to those who love the game- the constant challenge to figure out the puzzle of each rack is what keeps folks who love the game deeply interested. Playing 14.1 for many is just a great form of relaxation and "getting away from it all" - I would imagine he looked at it that way as well. No need for him to give free advice to those who could not play it well, or sit there while pros were running high numbers on him constantly.So few people even play it today it's really to bad. I was practicing one night in Raleigh 15 or so years ago and a local girl came up and asked what game it was. She had never heard of straight pool before. So she joined me for a couple hours and I gave her some 'free' lessons. It was all good and we had fun.
George Fels loved the game but would not play with anyone. He would come into Chris's and take a table and shoot straight pool all alone. I can't count he times I asked him to play and he politely declined every single time.. Never knew why but it was what it was. RIP George!
Back in the sixties when I was a teenager we would play for table time, at a penny a minute per player. I hated to lose that money I earned from my newspaper route paying for another guys time. That was how I learned to play straight pool..
Could be. It was not just me he would not play anyone. I never took it personally all of the regulars understood he liked to play alone. I like to practice straight alone as wellHe probably liked to play 14.1 alone because his time was limited and he did not want to spend half of it playing 14.1 safeties in order to play the game correctly in competition. I can fully understand that. Playing 14.1 alone is almost never boring to those who love the game- the constant challenge to figure out the puzzle of each rack is what keeps folks who love the game deeply interested. Playing 14.1 for many is just a great form of relaxation and "getting away from it all" - I would imagine he looked at it that way as well. No need for him to give free advice to those who could not play it well, or sit there while pros were running high numbers on him constantly.
As opposed to every other pool game where it’s always more fun to play someone, I also prefer to play/practice 14.1 by myself. Even though I’ve play the game for 50 years, I still feel like I’m always learning when I’m practicing 14.1 by myself, particularly break shots. When you’re playing someone in 14.1, for a relatively conservative player like me, too much time is wasted playing safeties.Could be. It was not just me he would not play anyone. I never took it personally all of the regulars understood he liked to play alone. I like to practice straight alone as well
It helps my 8 ball game a lot..
Yes, of course you are right here.But the WPA didn't exist until 1987, and North America (BCA) didn't join it until 1990. Their first world event was in 1990 (9-Ball), with Earl winning.
Aha....thanxI believe he meant Danny bait.
Stu, as I remember it, completely the opposite was true. The PPPA formed and had its 1976 tournament (their first one, in Asbury Park, NJ) because they were dissatisfied with the BCA US Open 14.1 prize fund -- $35,000. The PPPA members boycotted the US Open. I think later on the PPPA events were included in the BCA records but that may have been after the PPPA ceased to exist.... For example, if I'm remembering correctly, all the PPPA World Championships (1976-1983 and also 1986) had BCA sanctioning. ....
Earl turned out to be a much better straight pool player than anybody gave him credit for.
All the aforementioned players are all formidable straight pool players, hard to pick a winner.
Yup, that's how I remember it, too. Although I was just 18 years old at the time, I remember the boycott well and also how it led to the formation of the PPPA, I also think you're right that the sanctioning of their World 14.1 Championship came well after the fact.Stu, as I remember it, completely the opposite was true. The PPPA formed and had its 1976 tournament (their first one, in Asbury Park, NJ) because they were dissatisfied with the BCA US Open 14.1 prize fund -- $35,000. The PPPA members boycotted the US Open. I think later on the PPPA events were included in the BCA records but that may have been after the PPPA ceased to exist.
George also had a home table for many years, and I've always loved his supremely on target, published comment in that regard:George Fels loved the game but would not play with anyone. He would come into Chris's and take a table and shoot straight pool all alone. I can't count he times I asked him to play and he politely declined every single time.. Never knew why but it was what it was. RIP George!
..which led to a challenge match between Larry Lisciotti (the newly crowned Prince of Pool) and Tom Jennings.Yup, that's how I remember it, too. Although I was just 18 years old at the time, I remember the boycott well and also how it led to the formation of the PPPA, I also think you're right that the sanctioning of their World 14.1 Championship came well after the fact.
I'm sure you'll also recall that the boycott in 1976 (which included most of the big names, with Steve Mizerak and Ray Martin among the leaders) led to the crowning of a true Cinderella at the US Open 14.1, with the winner being a college math professor from New Jersey named Tom Jennings.
Those were interesting times for sure. Yes, the straight pool era had its controversies, too.
You dismissed John Schmidt pretty quickly. I would take John, especially if they play to 200+ points. I don't know how the tourney is played, but I think John is 1 of the favorites , especially if he takes a month or 2 to practice .The obvious answer is Hohmann, who is by far, the best straight pooler of this generation of players, but it wouldn't surprise me at all if Dennis Orcullo were to win it. At the last 14.1 challenge at Derby City, Dennis ran a 260 on a 4 1/4" pocket table. Even though Filler won the high run prize in that event with a 285, Josh made his run on a 4 1/2" pocket table, and I'd argue that Dennis' run was the better of the two.
Certainly, several others would have to reckoned with, and Filler, Chinakhov, Feijen, and Schmidt are the most obvious contenders, but my sense of things is that it would come down to Hohmann or Orcullo. The gradually increasing pedigree of Orcullo over the years at 14.1 is undeniable.
My pick is Orcullo.
You may need to reread my post. I listed six major contenders, and John was one of them. Of course he's dangerous! He's just not my pick to win it. You may favor him , and that's your every right.You dismissed John Schmidt pretty quickly. I would take John, especially if they play to 200+ points. I don't know how the tourney is played, but I think John is 1 of the favorites , especially if he takes a month or 2 to practice .
Wow, what a cool article. I never knew this match took place. Thanks for sharing...which led to a challenge match between Larry Lisciotti (the newly crowned Prince of Pool) and Tom Jennings.
![]()
A hustler meets an artist
It was still early in the match, but Tom Jennings was 140 balls ahead as Larry Lisciotti stared at the table. Fourteen balls sat in a tight cluster that wasvault.si.com
As far as just running balls in practice JS is the best of this era. In matches however, there's a bunch of people favored over him.You dismissed John Schmidt pretty quickly. I would take John, especially if they play to 200+ points. I don't know how the tourney is played, but I think John is 1 of the favorites , especially if he takes a month or 2 to practice .
I would agree with this, too. JS has not been the big force in competitive 14.1 that folks expected, until he proves differently, his legacy in 14.1 is mostly as a practice player - runs tons of balls in practice- like a Michael Eufemia did many years ago.As far as just running balls in practice JS is the best of this era. In matches however, there's a bunch of people favored over him.
Yes, agree, the other problem is folks who like conversation, more than pool- we all know those folks- and in 14.1 you need a ton of concentration to make the right moves- idle chatter is not welcome when I am trying to get through tough racksAs opposed to every other pool game where it’s always more fun to play someone, I also prefer to play/practice 14.1 by myself. Even though I’ve play the game for 50 years, I still feel like I’m always learning when I’m practicing 14.1 by myself, particularly break shots. When you’re playing someone in 14.1, for a relatively conservative player like me, too much time is wasted playing safeties.
This is really Lisciotti’s claim to fame, and the article was mainstream. When they did the article, they called him “the prince of pool,” so it became his nickname even though he already had one:Wow, what a cool article. I never knew this match took place. Thanks for sharing.