lol. Relax. The people I'm talking about were those posting on AZ and elsewhere that I post such as youtube. Do I need to have a personal relationship with someone before I can say "I know of numerous people ..."?
Center Pocket Music, the long-awaited CTE Pro One book, by Stan Shuffett.
- Thread starter JoeyA
- Start date
Nice poetry. I been practicing. That works better.
I observe the contact geometry not invisible references. None of the Cortical Target Estimates show any kind of contact alignment. Contact alignment IS WHAT CONSTITUTES A SHOT. Not available with ProCT.
No, but 3 or 4 is not numerous. And since the ones on here post anonymously with no actual proof of purchase the it would seem you really don't know anyone. Thing is you've been putting out a lot of unsubstantiated stuff that you have absolutely no proof of.
When you learn to speak english understandably would you come back and do so?
Better than? Practicing what for what? Practice makes perfect so what are you perfect at?
Is that a concession? CTE has locked your comprehension into conditional absolutes. When you understand English, you will be able to post more relevant responses.
Oh, I didn't know you were privy to the "numerous" private and email conversations I have had regarding CTE. Can you make me a list of unsubstantiated stuff I've been putting out?
It appears you are the one making poor assumptions about who I have discussed CTE with.
No it is a request that you use terms that are of use to the discussion. My comprehension is fine, your communication skills are lacking. You are attempting to troll using high-falutin' terminology that actually has NOTHING to do with the discussion. You are attempting to make some false comparison to something that NO ONE in pool uses nor which would be useful.
Sorry high falutin is more like peeps trying to sell a concept they can't even execute but are convinced is the way. My use of words, besides being concise and correct also saves time wasted detailing explanations you refuse to consider. Here's what I see about the ProCT debacle. It's entirely about you guys trying to save the product; on <blitz> at that.
Concise and correct are wasted if not understood.
I think I've probably missed some interesting ideas of yours that I didn't have the patience to decipher.
pj
chgo
Last edited:
Such am 4ums. Maybe nobody gets it. Maybe nobody GAF. Maybe one reader gets it and is forever enriched.
Attachments
LOL, when have you ever detailed anything
Refresh my memory on where this is from and I'll answer.
If we only save one Jim, just one, we have to try, that's who we are.Such am 4ums. Maybe nobody gets it. Maybe nobody GAF. Maybe one reader gets it and is forever enriched.
Where are your DETAILED explanations
Detailed doesn't mean over complex - only CTE does. Complex Trial Education.
About the only thing here I've gone into detail - if not exactly length over is Contact Geometry. That's pretty near when I first started posting here. That's most of it. Free and easier to do and more accurate than ProCT.
No, whatever you are calling contact geometry is not easier or more accurate to use for aiming than cte is.
Cte instruction is also free.
This is from wikipedia, please start a new thread and instruct is how this applies to aiming in pool.
"In mathematics, contact geometry is the study of a geometric structure on smooth manifolds given by a hyperplane distribution in the tangent bundle satisfying a condition called 'complete non-integrability'. Equivalently, such a distribution may be given (at least locally) as the kernel of a differential one-form, and the non-integrability condition translates into a maximal non-degeneracy condition on the form. These conditions are opposite to two equivalent conditions for 'complete integrability' of a hyperplane distribution, i.e. that it be tangent to a codimension one foliation on the manifold, whose equivalence is the content of the Frobenius theorem.
The standard contact structure on R3. Each point in R3 has a plane associated to it by the contact structure, in this case as the kernel of the one-form dz − y dx. These planes appear to twist along the y-axis.
Contact geometry is in many ways an odd-dimensional counterpart of symplectic geometry, a structure on certain even-dimensional manifolds. Both contact and symplectic geometry are motivated by the mathematical formalism of classical mechanics, where one can consider either the even-dimensional phase space of a mechanical system or constant-energy hypersurface, which, being codimension one, has odd dimension"
And how would you know what's easier and more exact if you don't know how to do one of them.