Jump sticks have changed the game

Not so. I have been playing this game for more than 50 years and it has never stopped evolving.
As have I. And while it’s changed a bit, it remains, as it always has been, primarily an offensive gunslinger game. If anything, adding more tools to defeat weak safety attempts has added to the need to play better safeties and has improved defensive play as a result.
 
There are hundreds if not thousands of options that can be experimented with.
Give me ONE of your hundreds that is as simple as the one I gave.

If the breaker can be hooked after making a ball and roll out, why is their opponent NOT allowed to roll out one time also.
 
Now THAT would be interesting although I doubt that many would take the push and try to shoot knowing that if they missed their opponent would have ball in hand. I like the push out option on evety shot. That sort of the way we used to play the game many years ago.
 
I don't think I know of another sport where people willingly handicap themselves by refusing to use legal equipment. Do you know where they don't have this discussion? In Taiwan, China, the Philippines, Europe, and well everywhere outside the United States. Why? Because those players use the world rules and are fully able to develop their skills without being shit on and told they are weak for using jump cues.

When is the last time an American junior player won a world championship? Or an American adult?

In this case it is my opinion that correlation is part of causation. The fact that STILL there are so many backwards opinions about jump cues in America which leads to rule variations that players have to contend with is part of why American players are generally behind the rest of the world for average skill levels.

It's truly nuts to me. I don't understand it. To me this is like the people who might have whined about chalk by telling those who used chalk that they weren't really skilled unless they could play without that Magical Twisting Powder.
Actually, Mahkeal Parris won the U17 World Championship in 2018. He's from the U.S. Virgin Islands.
 
I can draw and follow on jump shots - but not with consistent results. I quit practicing right about the time I learned to follow and draw so that explains why it's inconsistent - which I'm well aware of ;) I'm confident enough in my abilities to know that if I did practice enough I would also be very efficient with the jump cue - I simply like kicking more because I can control the CB much better.


And funny sidebar - I've watched that video a zillion times and I just now realized it was posted by Tanner Pruess. I don't know Tanner personally but I have met him and he's a good guy. He also recently started a training program and we are working on getting him to Boise.

@TannerPruess , looking forward to meeting you in August ;)
 
I think we are talking apples and oranges. I don't want players jumping. I definitely don't want them shooting masse' shots. Kicking at balls is a skill to hit the ball and largely luck after that. It is not a good bet.

I am interested in the 99.9% of the pool played out there which is every day casual play, not tournaments.

For years and years my room was flush with "play and pay by the game" Push-Out Nine-Ball and very few tournaments. Then I watched over a period of 5-7 years where it all changed to tournaments, races, and One-Foul. I would love to see the amount of action I once had in my room come back. I know Push-Out will never come back and at the same time, decades of races and One-Foul has shown me that players will only sporadically bet cheap on it. My action play has dwindled to almost nothing. Action play used to be the backbone of the game. Poolrooms thrived on it.
Must be your place because in OKC there is hundred to 5000$ action nightly and weekly.
 
John, just curious if you ever see that your opinions are usually the exact opposite of most people who post.
Just curious if you ever actually counted? In this thread for example I am seeing plenty of people whose opinions match mine.
 
Agreed, John. I think a lot of people enjoy the jump shot and I credit you for giving me a greater appreciation of the skill required to execute a good jump. It's no secret that I prefer disallowing use of the jump cue on anything but the first shot of an inning, It's my 46th year as a fan, and I can bear witness that very few runouts gone wrong were saved with a good kick or full cue jump back in the day while thirty times as many runouts gone wrong are saved with a jump these days. Once upon a time, it was lose the position, lose the runout, and I'll always feel that that's as it should be.
Why is not amazing that losing position and recovering is not appreciated. I mean think about it for a moment, bad roll, or hit just a bit too hard or too easy and now the shooter goes from an easy out to a hard one.

Given that the shot went from easy to difficult now the shooter has to come with extraordinary skill just to hit the ball and even more to control both balls. Doesn't matter where a masse', a kick or a jump is used, the shot is exponentially tougher.

You remember back when we were beginners and we made our first stop shot, then we learned to draw our ball.... Then we saw Mike Massey do an exhibition and realized that there was so much more that could be done with the cue ball. But just having a chalked cue only allowed us the possibility to draw two table lengths. To acquire Mike skills we would need to put in a massive amount of practice.

We were no longer impressed with two foot draw. So it is with jump cues. No player really wants to have to jump, or to have to masse' or kick. But they certainly have to learn how to do all that and draw their ball table length if they want all of the range that tools like modern cues, chalk, tips, diamonds, great cloth, and consistent rubber provides to them.

I was once in the fence about jumping, for a long time I didn't own a jump cue. But once I saw them selling and knew that I could provide one that worked as well or better I got busy learning how to use it so that I could demonstrate them properly.

And so it was through this skill-building and subsequent teaching that I learned that it is not nearly as easy as it looks and even a simple jump shot requires a decent amount of skill to complete consistently well.
 
I know that I’m the exception here, but I’d like to see the jump shot banned all together. And this comes from a person who owns a jump cue and has used it tournaments albeit a long time ago. Let‘s bring the game back to its purist form.
What is the purest form? Because 150 years ago or so they played with things called maces, basically long clubs.

Or maybe just play without chalk?

There is no purest form in pocket billiards because the sport contains a multitude of table sizes and configurations and many different games. 9 ball and one pocket are relatively recent games. I don't think that there is a game in the rule books now that is played the same way it was in 1900.

For me it goes like this, as long as the shooter controls the shot by his own physical actions and the equipment is not moving on its own and doesn't damage the other equipment then I think it should be allowed.

For example if jump cues had been introduced and accepted in 1920 then I believe that no player today would be against them in any fashion.
 
Scratch was BIH in kitchen UNLESS it was a players 2nd consec. foul, then it was BIH anywhere. 9b was played a LONG time before one-foul showed up. It was to speed up tournament play. That's it. Not to make the game better. 2-shot rollout is a far better game, especially if you're gambling. Less luck, more strategy.
And people forget or don't know that jump cues were created before the world went to one foul. Players used to push to jump shots in two-foul. Those who had cues with better jumpability were at an advantage in those days. Players with meuccis were screwed back then unless they had a jump cue, which meucci made one of as well.
 
I really can't argue against that... Players should be penalized for screwing up. Although the jump stick as saved my ass more than once. If the first shot of the inning rule became such then it's tough not to agree with the logic.
Umm having to come with a much more difficult shot or give up ball in hand is penalty enough.
 
Back
Top