Welcome to the discussion table mech, but we have been through this debate about 150 pages ago. The main reason is cause in Mosconi's day they did not have video capability - they have today. Plus Mosconi never claimed to have caught any of his large runs on camera - J.S.'s teem of conleeges are claiming to have an unedited video of 626 - without a miss. Not calling the three people that saw the run liars, just saying I find it odd that his sponsor desmon said "success was achieved - IF YOU WILL'. It's that last part that bothers me - since at the bogus 626 theater show (edited/chopped footage) - they do not offer any of their customers a signed unedited disc to take home and watch. J.S., C.W. desmon created a run - now let us see them run from the truth of providing evidence of their 626 new record claim. Don't get lost in the wax, wax is not just wax - in this case it is a clue, I think their idea is too release little bits of info about waxing every rack and what not - as a distraction from not providing solid evidence to the public that Mosconi's record has in fact been surpassed. After almost three years and many have offered good $ for an unedited signed copy. As for me - their claim is much like a business owner who is lookin to sell - but the seller does not want to show the potential buyer the revenue books. Without first seeing the numbers - I will not buy the 626 story. I prefer to ensure the slate is level before assembly - I guess some don't care. So again I think u meant backed up by "EDITED or CHOPPED VIDEO" rather than admissible video.