And yet, in a 3 horse race, he's still stuck at the starting gate, maybe this is finally the table Earl can't beat, maybe is those HUGE corner pockets, who knowsAnother great Earl quote. I think Dr Dave needs to add this to his t shirt offerings

And yet, in a 3 horse race, he's still stuck at the starting gate, maybe this is finally the table Earl can't beat, maybe is those HUGE corner pockets, who knowsAnother great Earl quote. I think Dr Dave needs to add this to his t shirt offerings
Age for sure may be a factor.Then it could have been 25 years ago. Combine that time span with aging and his lack of playing straight pool and I think he is doing pretty well.
Will he beat the young guns probably not. I do not think there is anyone near his age that could do as well.. It might be fun to see an over 60 challenge for a high run separately.....
It's only a matter of time before everyone figures it out, great 9 ball players don't make for great 14.1 players. Send an invite to Thorsten Hohmann, Nick Van den Berg, Oliver Ortmann, Niels Feijen, just to mention a few that DO play 14.1 because they know how toThanks for the kind words. It is a lot of endless work but Me and my team are dedicated and will run this event for a VERY long time and other events also. I dont know about getting players that can run big numbers like you said. Earl has only played 2 days and his numbers are getting better and Ive kept him busy everyday before he starts playing 14.1. Earl and the other players I have scheduled and others Im waiting to schedule are all qualified as they all have won a sanctioned World Championship and we are very happy to have them participate and everyone is getting to watch live unedited video for FREE and it is gonna only get better as the event continues.
Its gonna be interesting when a few of the players are gonna stay for 2 weeks to a month at a time with unlimited attempts. We will certainly see some MONSTER runs as the World Champions dedicate themselves and wake up everyday to eat high runs for breakfast, lunch and dinner. So as with 14.1 you gotta have patience and realize its not a jog its a marathon. I have endless patience,time and money so nothing will stop this freight train from going on for a VERY long time.
Deflection isn't really the point of a 14mm shaft, the tip is bigger on the cue ball, more contact less chance of miscues, and much closer to center ball contact, then, less deflection because of the thicker shaft, yet at the same time, more spin on the cue ball because more tip is in contact with the cue ball to increase side spin.One thing I like about watching Earl is how he has mastered his new shaft so quickly.
Not many people today will use a solid maple 14mm shaft with a linen phenolic ferrule.
Earl ain’t afraid of deflection.
Deflection isn't really the point of a 14mm shaft, the tip is bigger on the cue ball, more contact less chance of miscues, and much closer to center ball contact, then, less deflection because of the thicker shaft, yet at the same time, more spin on the cue ball because more tip is in contact with the cue ball to increase side spin.
I am pretty sure I have seen this too...up in the middle of the table..above side pockets.
That’s absolutely true. Johnny Erv sure could play in his late years, I saw that personally.Speaking of Earl vs Ervolino, and high runs in older age, Johnny ran I believe 315 when he was either in his late 50's or early 60's. I vaguely recall it was on the front page of AZB's main site (not the forum). This was probably around 2004 when AZB was still new. I searched for the article but had no luck finding it.
Now Earl is about the same age. Earl came back and won that match from 1995. Will he beat Johnny's high run though, at a similar age?
Edit, I found this post from one pocket.org. It states Johnny ran 333 at age 65 in the year 2000. https://onepocket.org/forum/index.php?threads/johnny-ervolino.164/
I still remember the first time I saw Ervolino play at Chelsea Billiards. I asked Grady Mathews about him and Grady told me two things. The first was that Ervolino was a 300 ball runner, and the second I can't repeat.Speaking of Earl vs Ervolino, and high runs in older age, Johnny ran I believe 315 when he was either in his late 50's or early 60's. I vaguely recall it was on the front page of AZB's main site (not the forum). This was probably around 2004 when AZB was still new. I searched for the article but had no luck finding it.
Now Earl is about the same age. Earl came back and won that match from 1995. Will he beat Johnny's high run though, at a similar age?
Edit, I found this post from one pocket.org. It states Johnny ran 333 at age 65 in the year 2000. https://onepocket.org/forum/index.php?threads/johnny-ervolino.164/
Glad your respecting Grady’s confidence in you. Grady picked his spots well.I still remember the first time I saw Ervolino play at Chelsea Billiards. I asked Grady Mathews about him and Grady told me two things. The first was that Ervolino was a 300 ball runner, and the second I can't repeat.
And get Schmidt there too by whatever means or inducement!!! The table is ideal for him, and so is the process and the nature of the challenge.It's only a matter of time before everyone figures it out, great 9 ball players don't make for great 14.1 players. Send an invite to Thorsten Hohmann, Nick Van den Berg, Oliver Ortmann, Niels Feijen, just to mention a few that DO play 14.1 because they know how to
And get Schmidt there too by whatever means or inducement!!! The table is ideal for him, and so is the process and the nature of the challenge.
Who can rationally say otherwise?
Arnaldo
And this is precisely why today's players can't compete at 14.1 with what the top players of yesteryear could do.Earl needs to “tighten up” his end game.
He is shooting too many long shots, putting too many balls up table, and he is playing “area” position instead of “precise” position.
He is playing more of a rotation style than a 14.1 style.
And this is precisely why today's players can't compete at 14.1 with what the top players of yesteryear could do.
We aren't used to it.
well, aren't you a sassy little tart. lol
Umm… no.Deflection isn't really the point of a 14mm shaft, the tip is bigger on the cue ball, more contact less chance of miscues, and much closer to center ball contact, then, less deflection because of the thicker shaft, yet at the same time, more spin on the cue ball because more tip is in contact with the cue ball to increase side spin.